Factors behind poor cognitive outcome following a thalamic stroke.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neurology Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1007/s00415-024-12777-4
Julie P C Vidal, Lola Danet, Germain Arribarat, Jérémie Pariente, Patrice Péran, Jean-François Albucher, Emmanuel J Barbeau
{"title":"Factors behind poor cognitive outcome following a thalamic stroke.","authors":"Julie P C Vidal, Lola Danet, Germain Arribarat, Jérémie Pariente, Patrice Péran, Jean-François Albucher, Emmanuel J Barbeau","doi":"10.1007/s00415-024-12777-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thalamic strokes produce neurological, cognitive, and behavioral symptoms depending on the thalamic nuclei involved. While traditionally associated with severe cognitive deficits, recent studies suggest more modest impairments. This study aims to identify the factors that influence the severity of cognitive impairment following thalamic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 40 patients (mean age 51.1) with chronic isolated thalamic stroke and 45 healthy subjects (mean age 48.5) who underwent neuroimaging and neuropsychological assessment. Cluster and principal component analyses were used to discriminate patients from healthy subjects based on cognitive tasks. Disconnectome maps and cortical thickness were analyzed to understand the distant impact of thalamic strokes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two cognitive profiles emerged from the cluster analysis. Cluster 1 included mostly healthy subjects (n = 43) and patients with no or minor deficits (n = 20). Cluster 2 included patients (n = 19) and two healthy subjects with severe deficits in verbal memory, executive functions, and attention. Cluster 1 encompassed all patients with right thalamic stroke, while Cluster 2 included all patients with bilateral stroke or mammillothalamic tract interruption. Patients with left-sided stroke were equally divided between clusters. Significant differences between clusters included age, education, interthalamic adhesion disruption, lesion volume, and location. Patients with left-sided stroke in Cluster 2 had more lateral thalamic lesions and greater disruption of the anterior thalamic projection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contrary to common expectations, our findings suggest that many patients with thalamic stroke have relatively good cognitive outcomes. In contrast, we identified the factors behind poor outcomes that will help clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 1","pages":"98"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706879/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12777-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Thalamic strokes produce neurological, cognitive, and behavioral symptoms depending on the thalamic nuclei involved. While traditionally associated with severe cognitive deficits, recent studies suggest more modest impairments. This study aims to identify the factors that influence the severity of cognitive impairment following thalamic stroke.

Methods: We recruited 40 patients (mean age 51.1) with chronic isolated thalamic stroke and 45 healthy subjects (mean age 48.5) who underwent neuroimaging and neuropsychological assessment. Cluster and principal component analyses were used to discriminate patients from healthy subjects based on cognitive tasks. Disconnectome maps and cortical thickness were analyzed to understand the distant impact of thalamic strokes.

Results: Two cognitive profiles emerged from the cluster analysis. Cluster 1 included mostly healthy subjects (n = 43) and patients with no or minor deficits (n = 20). Cluster 2 included patients (n = 19) and two healthy subjects with severe deficits in verbal memory, executive functions, and attention. Cluster 1 encompassed all patients with right thalamic stroke, while Cluster 2 included all patients with bilateral stroke or mammillothalamic tract interruption. Patients with left-sided stroke were equally divided between clusters. Significant differences between clusters included age, education, interthalamic adhesion disruption, lesion volume, and location. Patients with left-sided stroke in Cluster 2 had more lateral thalamic lesions and greater disruption of the anterior thalamic projection.

Conclusions: Contrary to common expectations, our findings suggest that many patients with thalamic stroke have relatively good cognitive outcomes. In contrast, we identified the factors behind poor outcomes that will help clinicians.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丘脑中风后认知能力低下的原因。
背景:丘脑中风产生的神经、认知和行为症状取决于所涉及的丘脑核。虽然传统上与严重的认知缺陷有关,但最近的研究表明,这种损害更轻微。本研究旨在确定影响丘脑卒中后认知障碍严重程度的因素。方法:我们招募了40例慢性孤立性丘脑卒中患者(平均年龄51.1岁)和45例健康受试者(平均年龄48.5岁)进行神经影像学和神经心理学评估。基于认知任务,采用聚类分析和主成分分析来区分患者和健康受试者。通过分析断连图和皮质厚度来了解丘脑中风的远端影响。结果:聚类分析产生了两种认知特征。第1组包括大多数健康受试者(n = 43)和无或轻度缺陷患者(n = 20)。第2组包括19名患者和2名在言语记忆、执行功能和注意力方面存在严重缺陷的健康受试者。第1组包括所有右丘脑卒中患者,第2组包括所有双侧卒中或乳丘脑束中断患者。左脑卒中患者平均分为两组。不同簇间的显著差异包括年龄、教育程度、丘脑间粘连破坏、病变体积和位置。第2组左脑卒中患者有更多的外侧丘脑病变和更大的丘脑前投影破坏。结论:与普遍预期相反,我们的研究结果表明,许多丘脑卒中患者的认知预后相对较好。相反,我们确定了不良结果背后的因素,这将有助于临床医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Switching from inotersen to eplontersen in patients with hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis with polyneuropathy: analysis from NEURO-TTRansform. Sustained therapeutic effect of spinal cord stimulation on improving severe neurogenic orthostatic hypotension in a patient with pure autonomic failure converting to multiple system atrophy. Towards a biological view of multiple sclerosis from early subtle to clinical progression: an expert opinion. Albert Sidney Frankau Leyton, né Grünbaum (1869-1921). Chronic vertigo and central oculomotor dysfunction with evidence of anti-ITPR1 antibodies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1