Income and Insurance-Based Disparities in Primary Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremities.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1002/jso.28077
Charlotte F Wahle, Sara Sakowitz, Nicole J Newman-Hung, Nicholas M Bernthal, Peyman Benharash, Lauren E Wessel
{"title":"Income and Insurance-Based Disparities in Primary Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremities.","authors":"Charlotte F Wahle, Sara Sakowitz, Nicole J Newman-Hung, Nicholas M Bernthal, Peyman Benharash, Lauren E Wessel","doi":"10.1002/jso.28077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are rare but can be devastating. Paradigm shifts in adjuvant treatment have expanded the availability of limb salvage; however, a subset of patients still require amputation. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of patient, disease, and practice-related factors on rates of amputation in STS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All adults undergoing resection for STS of the extremities were tabulated from the 2004-2021 National Cancer Database (NCDB). Multivariable models were utilized to evaluate risk factors for undergoing amputation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 31 805 patients, 1880 (6%) underwent amputation. Those who underwent amputation were younger (57 vs. 60, p < 0.001), more commonly Black (12% vs. 9%, p < 0.00), and more frequently Medicaid insured (11% vs. 6%, p < 0.001). Amputation patients experienced a longer time from diagnosis to surgery, compared to limb salvage patients (46 [23-91] vs. 37 days [9-93], p < 0.001). Amputation was associated with a significantly greater hazard of overall mortality over 10 years following resection (HR 1.66, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We report significant race-, income-, and insurance-based disparities in amputation risk and overall survival for patients with STS of the extremities. We also report a significantly increased risk of amputation for patients with delayed clinical presentation. Multidisciplinary sarcoma care teams should be aware of these disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28077","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are rare but can be devastating. Paradigm shifts in adjuvant treatment have expanded the availability of limb salvage; however, a subset of patients still require amputation. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of patient, disease, and practice-related factors on rates of amputation in STS.

Methods: All adults undergoing resection for STS of the extremities were tabulated from the 2004-2021 National Cancer Database (NCDB). Multivariable models were utilized to evaluate risk factors for undergoing amputation.

Results: Of 31 805 patients, 1880 (6%) underwent amputation. Those who underwent amputation were younger (57 vs. 60, p < 0.001), more commonly Black (12% vs. 9%, p < 0.00), and more frequently Medicaid insured (11% vs. 6%, p < 0.001). Amputation patients experienced a longer time from diagnosis to surgery, compared to limb salvage patients (46 [23-91] vs. 37 days [9-93], p < 0.001). Amputation was associated with a significantly greater hazard of overall mortality over 10 years following resection (HR 1.66, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: We report significant race-, income-, and insurance-based disparities in amputation risk and overall survival for patients with STS of the extremities. We also report a significantly increased risk of amputation for patients with delayed clinical presentation. Multidisciplinary sarcoma care teams should be aware of these disparities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
四肢原发性软组织肉瘤的收入和保险差异。
背景和目的:软组织肉瘤(STSs)是罕见的,但可能是毁灭性的。辅助治疗的范式转变扩大了肢体保留的可用性;然而,仍有一部分患者需要截肢。本研究的目的是探讨患者、疾病和实践相关因素对STS截肢率的影响。方法:从2004-2021年国家癌症数据库(NCDB)中列出所有接受四肢STS切除术的成年人。采用多变量模型评价截肢手术的危险因素。结果:31 805例患者中,行截肢1880例(6%)。结论:我们报告了四肢STS患者在截肢风险和总体生存方面存在显著的种族、收入和保险差异。我们还报道了延迟临床表现的患者截肢的风险显著增加。多学科肉瘤治疗团队应该意识到这些差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Implications of Artificial Intelligence for Colorectal Cancer: Correspondence. ChatGPT 35 Better Improves Comprehensibility of English, Than Spanish, Generated Responses to Osteosarcoma Questions. Dedication of Five Pioneers of Peritoneal Surface Malignancy. Prehabilitation of Patients With Oesophageal Malignancy Undergoing Peri-Operative Treatment (Pre-EMPT): Outcomes From a Prospective Controlled Trial. CTCs Detection Methods In Vivo and In Vitro and Their Application in Tumor Immunotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1