Reducing Postoperative Opioid Use: A Comparison of Open Versus Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia for Patients Undergoing Open Pancreatoduodenectomy.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1002/jso.28074
Parit T Mavani, Caitlin Sok, Pranay S Ajay, Tarrant McPherson, Jeffrey Switchenko, David A Kooby, Mihir M Shah
{"title":"Reducing Postoperative Opioid Use: A Comparison of Open Versus Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia for Patients Undergoing Open Pancreatoduodenectomy.","authors":"Parit T Mavani, Caitlin Sok, Pranay S Ajay, Tarrant McPherson, Jeffrey Switchenko, David A Kooby, Mihir M Shah","doi":"10.1002/jso.28074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid crisis is a national issue with significant economic burden and marked increase in opioid-related deaths, particularly following surgical procedures. Reducing opioid requirements while maintaining effective analgesia is critically challenging, perioperatively. Multimodal drug regimens and guided regional anesthesia (RA) have been adopted to address this issue. We aimed to assess postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing open pancreatoduodenectomy based on the routes of RA administration: open versus ultra-sound guided.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Emory University Saint Joseph's Hospital, encompassing patients who underwent open pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) from 2020 to 2022 who received ultrasound-guided RA (U-RA) or open RA (O-RA). Patient demographics, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes, including opioid consumption measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) at 24, 48, and 72 h, were analyzed. Multivariable linear regression identified predictors of postoperative opioid use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 95 patients, 47 met inclusion criteria: 27 received U-RA and 20 O-RA. Preoperative and intraoperative characteristics were similar between patients receiving O-RA and U-RA. A lower opioid requirement was noted in the O-RA group compared to the U-RA group at all time points. (24 h: 6.5 vs. 18, p = 0.004; 48 h: 18 vs. 37, p = 0.001; 72 h: 30.5 vs. 57, p = 0.002). On multivariable analysis, only route of regional anesthesia was independently associated with reduced opioid use across all time points (24 h: mean difference = -5.75, 95% CI: -11.3, -0.18; 48 h: mean difference = -16.95, 95% CI: -27.5, -6.4; 72 h: mean difference = -20.39, 95% CI: -35.4, -5.3) Patient age, gender, race, obesity, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, small pancreatic duct, and pancreatic fistula were not independently associated with opioid use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>O-RA may offer a better approach than U-RA in minimizing opioid consumption after open PD. These findings suggest the incorporation of O-RA for upper abdominal surgeries to decrease the necessity of postoperative opioids.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Opioid crisis is a national issue with significant economic burden and marked increase in opioid-related deaths, particularly following surgical procedures. Reducing opioid requirements while maintaining effective analgesia is critically challenging, perioperatively. Multimodal drug regimens and guided regional anesthesia (RA) have been adopted to address this issue. We aimed to assess postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing open pancreatoduodenectomy based on the routes of RA administration: open versus ultra-sound guided.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Emory University Saint Joseph's Hospital, encompassing patients who underwent open pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) from 2020 to 2022 who received ultrasound-guided RA (U-RA) or open RA (O-RA). Patient demographics, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes, including opioid consumption measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) at 24, 48, and 72 h, were analyzed. Multivariable linear regression identified predictors of postoperative opioid use.

Results: Of 95 patients, 47 met inclusion criteria: 27 received U-RA and 20 O-RA. Preoperative and intraoperative characteristics were similar between patients receiving O-RA and U-RA. A lower opioid requirement was noted in the O-RA group compared to the U-RA group at all time points. (24 h: 6.5 vs. 18, p = 0.004; 48 h: 18 vs. 37, p = 0.001; 72 h: 30.5 vs. 57, p = 0.002). On multivariable analysis, only route of regional anesthesia was independently associated with reduced opioid use across all time points (24 h: mean difference = -5.75, 95% CI: -11.3, -0.18; 48 h: mean difference = -16.95, 95% CI: -27.5, -6.4; 72 h: mean difference = -20.39, 95% CI: -35.4, -5.3) Patient age, gender, race, obesity, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, small pancreatic duct, and pancreatic fistula were not independently associated with opioid use.

Conclusions: O-RA may offer a better approach than U-RA in minimizing opioid consumption after open PD. These findings suggest the incorporation of O-RA for upper abdominal surgeries to decrease the necessity of postoperative opioids.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少术后阿片类药物的使用:开放式与超声引导下区域麻醉对胰十二指肠切除术患者的比较。
背景:阿片类药物危机是一个具有重大经济负担和阿片类药物相关死亡显著增加的全国性问题,特别是在外科手术后。减少阿片类药物的需求,同时保持有效的镇痛是非常具有挑战性的,围手术期。多模式药物方案和引导区域麻醉(RA)已被采用来解决这个问题。我们的目的是评估开放式胰十二指肠切除术患者术后阿片类药物的消耗,基于RA给药途径:开放与超声引导。方法:本回顾性队列研究在埃默里大学圣约瑟夫医院进行,纳入了2020年至2022年接受超声引导RA (U-RA)或开放式RA (O-RA)的开放式胰十二指肠切除术(PD)患者。分析患者人口统计、手术细节和术后结果,包括在24、48和72小时以吗啡毫克当量(MME)测量的阿片类药物消耗。多变量线性回归确定了术后阿片类药物使用的预测因素。结果:95例患者中,47例符合纳入标准,其中U-RA 27例,O-RA 20例。接受O-RA和U-RA的患者术前和术中特征相似。在所有时间点,与U-RA组相比,O-RA组的阿片类药物需求较低。(24 h: 6.5 vs. 18, p = 0.004;48小时:18 vs. 37, p = 0.001;72小时:30.5比57,p = 0.002)。在多变量分析中,在所有时间点上,只有区域麻醉途径与阿片类药物使用减少独立相关(24小时:平均差异= -5.75,95% CI: -11.3, -0.18;48 h:平均差值= -16.95,95% CI: -27.5, -6.4;72小时:平均差值= -20.39,95% CI: -35.4, -5.3)患者年龄、性别、种族、肥胖、新辅助化疗、小胰管和胰瘘与阿片类药物使用无关。结论:与U-RA相比,O-RA可能是减少开放PD后阿片类药物消耗的更好方法。这些结果表明,在上腹部手术中加入O-RA可以减少术后阿片类药物的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Implications of Artificial Intelligence for Colorectal Cancer: Correspondence. ChatGPT 35 Better Improves Comprehensibility of English, Than Spanish, Generated Responses to Osteosarcoma Questions. Dedication of Five Pioneers of Peritoneal Surface Malignancy. Prehabilitation of Patients With Oesophageal Malignancy Undergoing Peri-Operative Treatment (Pre-EMPT): Outcomes From a Prospective Controlled Trial. CTCs Detection Methods In Vivo and In Vitro and Their Application in Tumor Immunotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1