Mechanical Failure of the Stryker T2 Alpha Retrograde Femoral Nail.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1097/BOT.0000000000002955
Luke A Lopas, Chirag Soni, Roman M Natoli, Yohan Jang, Mason Milburn, Todd O McKinley, Brian Mullis, Jan P Szatkowski
{"title":"Mechanical Failure of the Stryker T2 Alpha Retrograde Femoral Nail.","authors":"Luke A Lopas, Chirag Soni, Roman M Natoli, Yohan Jang, Mason Milburn, Todd O McKinley, Brian Mullis, Jan P Szatkowski","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate mechanical failure rates of retrograde femoral nails in the treatment of distal femur fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Urban Academic Level 1 Trauma Center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Included were adult patients who sustained a distal femur fracture (AO/OTA 33) who were treated with a retrograde intramedullary nail from August 2021 through September 2022.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>The primary outcome was the rate of mechanical failure of the intramedullary nail defined as deformation and/or breakage of the intramedullary nail. The rate of mechanical failure was compared amongst retrograde femoral nails used at the same institution during the same time period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and twenty distal femur fractures were identified (77 native distal femur, 43 periprosthetic) that were treated with a retrograde intramedullary nail. Average patient age was 67 years (SD 15.1, range 18-96 years). Eighty-three (69.2%) of patients were female. Four mechanical nail failures (deformation and/or breakage of the intramedullary nail) were observed within six months of surgery, two in patients with native distal femur fractures, and two in patients with periprosthetic distal femur fractures. All failures occurred among forty-nine fractures treated with a newly released retrograde femoral nail, the T2 Alpha Retrograde Femoral Nail (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ). This represents an 8.2% mechanical failure rate of distal femur fractures treated with this new nail compared to no failures observed with any other nail (p=0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mechanical nail failures, within six months of surgery for distal femur fracture, of a new retrograde femoral nail were observed to be higher than seen with other nails. Further evaluation is needed to determine if this experience represents factors related to patient, injury, or surgical characteristics, an anomaly, or a safety signal.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III. See instructions for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002955","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate mechanical failure rates of retrograde femoral nails in the treatment of distal femur fractures.

Methods: Design: Retrospective chart review.

Setting: Urban Academic Level 1 Trauma Center.

Patient selection criteria: Included were adult patients who sustained a distal femur fracture (AO/OTA 33) who were treated with a retrograde intramedullary nail from August 2021 through September 2022.

Outcome measures and comparisons: The primary outcome was the rate of mechanical failure of the intramedullary nail defined as deformation and/or breakage of the intramedullary nail. The rate of mechanical failure was compared amongst retrograde femoral nails used at the same institution during the same time period.

Results: One hundred and twenty distal femur fractures were identified (77 native distal femur, 43 periprosthetic) that were treated with a retrograde intramedullary nail. Average patient age was 67 years (SD 15.1, range 18-96 years). Eighty-three (69.2%) of patients were female. Four mechanical nail failures (deformation and/or breakage of the intramedullary nail) were observed within six months of surgery, two in patients with native distal femur fractures, and two in patients with periprosthetic distal femur fractures. All failures occurred among forty-nine fractures treated with a newly released retrograde femoral nail, the T2 Alpha Retrograde Femoral Nail (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ). This represents an 8.2% mechanical failure rate of distal femur fractures treated with this new nail compared to no failures observed with any other nail (p=0.03).

Conclusions: Mechanical nail failures, within six months of surgery for distal femur fracture, of a new retrograde femoral nail were observed to be higher than seen with other nails. Further evaluation is needed to determine if this experience represents factors related to patient, injury, or surgical characteristics, an anomaly, or a safety signal.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See instructions for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stryker T2 α逆行股内钉的机械故障。
目的:评价逆行股内钉治疗股骨远端骨折的机械失败率。方法:设计:回顾性图表回顾。地点:城市学术一级创伤中心。患者选择标准:纳入了2021年8月至2022年9月期间接受逆行髓内钉治疗的成年股骨远端骨折(AO/OTA 33)患者。结果测量和比较:主要结果是髓内钉的机械失败率,定义为髓内钉的变形和/或断裂。我们比较了同一机构在同一时间段内使用逆行股骨钉的机械失败率。结果:鉴定出120例股骨远端骨折(77例为天然股骨远端骨折,43例为假体周围骨折),均采用逆行髓内钉治疗。患者平均年龄67岁(SD 15.1,范围18-96岁)。女性83例(69.2%)。在手术后6个月内观察到4例机械钉失效(髓内钉变形和/或断裂),其中2例发生在股骨远端骨折患者中,2例发生在股骨远端假体周围骨折患者中。49例骨折均采用新释放的逆行股钉,即T2 α逆行股钉(Stryker, Mahwah, NJ)治疗。这表明使用这种新钉治疗股骨远端骨折的机械失败率为8.2%,而使用其他任何钉均未观察到失败率(p=0.03)。结论:股骨远端骨折术后6个月内,新逆行股骨干内钉的机械钉失败率高于其他内钉。需要进一步评估以确定这种经历是否代表与患者、损伤或手术特征相关的因素、异常或安全信号。证据等级:治疗性III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
The Rapid Escalation of Fractures and Hospital Admissions from Electric Bicycle Injuries in the United States: An Analysis of National Injury Data from 2019 to 2023. Inability to Remove Locking Screws From the Femoral Neck System Due to Stripping of the Screwdriver Within the Locking Screw Head. Hardware Removal After Lisfranc Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Results in Improved Physical Function. Cast-OFF 2: One Week Versus 3-5 Weeks of Plaster Cast Immobilization for Non- or Minimally Displaced Distal Radius Fractures-A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. The Use of External Beam Radiation Therapy for Heterotopic Ossification Prophylaxis After Surgical Fixation of Acetabular Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1