Effect of Ropivacaine Combined with Nalbuphine in Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Trauma Surgery: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-01-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S493518
Jin Zhang, Fan Zhang, Hao Zhang, Lei Yu, Jun Chen, Shaolin Wang
{"title":"Effect of Ropivacaine Combined with Nalbuphine in Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Trauma Surgery: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Jin Zhang, Fan Zhang, Hao Zhang, Lei Yu, Jun Chen, Shaolin Wang","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S493518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been increasingly utilized for postoperative analgesia in thoracic, abdominal, and spinal surgeries. This study evaluated the postoperative analgesic outcomes of ESPB with nalbuphine as a ropivacaine adjuvant for lumbar trauma surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized double-blind clinical trial included 57 participants who underwent lumbar trauma surgery. Ultrasound-guided ESPB was performed with 0.375% ropivacaine (Group R) and 0.375% ropivacaine combined with 10 mg nalbuphine (Group N); 20 mL was used per side. The primary outcome measure was the time to first postoperative remedial analgesia. The secondary outcome measures included the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores at rest and during movement, cumulative sufentanil consumption after surgery, intraoperative dosage of remifentanil and sufentanil, time to first off-bed, time to first flatus, and length of hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean difference in the time to first postoperative remedial analgesia (Group N vs Group R, 489±52 min vs 391±23 min) was 98 min (95% CI, 76 to 119). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed an increasing pain-free population in Group N and an increasing pain-free duration. The log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test showed that the hazard ratio (HR, Group N/Group R) was 0.225 (95% CI, 0.114 to 0.443). Group N showed decreased sufentanil consumption compared with Group R at 4-8 h, 8-12 h and 0-24 h after surgery (<i>P</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ESPB with nalbuphine in combination with ropivacaine significantly prolonged the duration of analgesia and reduced postoperative analgesic demands compared to ropivacaine alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"11-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706020/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S493518","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been increasingly utilized for postoperative analgesia in thoracic, abdominal, and spinal surgeries. This study evaluated the postoperative analgesic outcomes of ESPB with nalbuphine as a ropivacaine adjuvant for lumbar trauma surgery.

Methods: This randomized double-blind clinical trial included 57 participants who underwent lumbar trauma surgery. Ultrasound-guided ESPB was performed with 0.375% ropivacaine (Group R) and 0.375% ropivacaine combined with 10 mg nalbuphine (Group N); 20 mL was used per side. The primary outcome measure was the time to first postoperative remedial analgesia. The secondary outcome measures included the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores at rest and during movement, cumulative sufentanil consumption after surgery, intraoperative dosage of remifentanil and sufentanil, time to first off-bed, time to first flatus, and length of hospital stay.

Results: The mean difference in the time to first postoperative remedial analgesia (Group N vs Group R, 489±52 min vs 391±23 min) was 98 min (95% CI, 76 to 119). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed an increasing pain-free population in Group N and an increasing pain-free duration. The log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test showed that the hazard ratio (HR, Group N/Group R) was 0.225 (95% CI, 0.114 to 0.443). Group N showed decreased sufentanil consumption compared with Group R at 4-8 h, 8-12 h and 0-24 h after surgery (P<0.001).

Conclusion: ESPB with nalbuphine in combination with ropivacaine significantly prolonged the duration of analgesia and reduced postoperative analgesic demands compared to ropivacaine alone.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗哌卡因联合纳布啡用于竖脊肌平面阻滞对腰椎外伤术后镇痛的影响:一项单中心随机对照试验。
背景:竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)越来越多地用于胸、腹、脊柱手术的术后镇痛。本研究评估了纳布啡作为罗哌卡因辅助治疗腰椎创伤手术的ESPB术后镇痛效果。方法:这项随机双盲临床试验包括57名接受腰椎创伤手术的参与者。超声引导下,0.375%罗哌卡因(R组)和0.375%罗哌卡因联合10mg纳布啡(N组)行ESPB;每侧20ml。主要观察指标为术后首次镇痛时间。次要结局指标包括休息和运动时的数值评定量表(NRS)评分、术后舒芬太尼累计用量、术中瑞芬太尼和舒芬太尼剂量、首次下床时间、首次放屁时间和住院时间。结果:术后首次镇痛时间(N组vs R组,489±52 min vs 391±23 min)的平均差异为98 min (95% CI, 76 ~ 119)。Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示N组无痛人数增加,无痛持续时间增加。log-rank (Mantel-Cox)检验显示,N/ R组的风险比(HR)为0.225 (95% CI, 0.114 ~ 0.443)。N组术后4-8 h、8-12 h、0-24 h舒芬太尼用量较R组减少(p结论:ESPB联合纳布啡联合罗哌卡因与单独罗哌卡因相比,明显延长了镇痛时间,降低了术后镇痛需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Adding Local Anesthesia to General Anesthesia on Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study. A Cross-Sectional Survey on Musculoskeletal Pain Among Professional and Non-Professional Gamers in Saudi Arabia: Associations with Gaming Genre, Duration, and Ergonomic Factors [Response To Letter]. Analgesic and Sedative Effects of Virtual Reality on Children with Acute Pulpitis: A Study Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial. Effects of Oxycodone versus Sufentanil-Based Intravenous Patient-Controlled Multimodal Analgesia on Early Gastrointestinal Recovery and Pain After Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial. Modulation of Brain Activity in Patients with Acute Non-Specific Low Back Pain by Wentong Guan Therapy: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1