Effectiveness and safety of talimogene laherparepvec and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for metastatic melanoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety of talimogene laherparepvec and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for metastatic melanoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Yu-Chun Shen, Ya-Li Huang, Yi-No Kang, Wen-Kuan Chiu, Khanh Dinh Hoang, Hsian-Jenn Wang, Chiehfeng Chen","doi":"10.1097/CMR.0000000000001010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Melanoma is an aggressive tumor that is challenging to treat. Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), the first oncolytic virus treatment approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat unresectable melanoma, was recently used in recurrent tumors after initial surgery. Our network meta-analysis aimed to compare T-VEC treatment of metastatic melanoma with treatment of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and control group. The protocol for this network meta-analysis was retrospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022363321). Three databases, namely Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library, were searched until 10 June 2024. The search terms used were a combination of 'metastatic melanoma', 'melanoma', 'T-VEC', 'talimogene laherparepvec', and 'GM-CSF'. Seven studies, with 978 participants receiving T-VEC treatment, 649 participants receiving GM-CSF treatment, and 938 participants constituting the control group, were included in our meta-analysis. For 1-year overall survival (OS), the league table revealed significant differences between the control and T-VEC groups [0.90 (0.83, 0.99)]. The disease-free survival (DFS) over 2 years was also analyzed showing no difference between the groups in DFS in the league table. T-VEC may be a favorable treatment for metastatic melanoma owing to the notable increase in OS. Nevertheless, due to the side effects and limitations, the clinical benefits of T-VEC therapy in metastatic melanoma should be interpreted cautiously. This network meta-analysis demonstrates that T-VEC may be a favorable choice of treatment for metastatic melanoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":18550,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Research","volume":"35 1","pages":"60-66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melanoma Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CMR.0000000000001010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Melanoma is an aggressive tumor that is challenging to treat. Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), the first oncolytic virus treatment approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat unresectable melanoma, was recently used in recurrent tumors after initial surgery. Our network meta-analysis aimed to compare T-VEC treatment of metastatic melanoma with treatment of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and control group. The protocol for this network meta-analysis was retrospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022363321). Three databases, namely Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library, were searched until 10 June 2024. The search terms used were a combination of 'metastatic melanoma', 'melanoma', 'T-VEC', 'talimogene laherparepvec', and 'GM-CSF'. Seven studies, with 978 participants receiving T-VEC treatment, 649 participants receiving GM-CSF treatment, and 938 participants constituting the control group, were included in our meta-analysis. For 1-year overall survival (OS), the league table revealed significant differences between the control and T-VEC groups [0.90 (0.83, 0.99)]. The disease-free survival (DFS) over 2 years was also analyzed showing no difference between the groups in DFS in the league table. T-VEC may be a favorable treatment for metastatic melanoma owing to the notable increase in OS. Nevertheless, due to the side effects and limitations, the clinical benefits of T-VEC therapy in metastatic melanoma should be interpreted cautiously. This network meta-analysis demonstrates that T-VEC may be a favorable choice of treatment for metastatic melanoma.
期刊介绍:
Melanoma Research is a well established international forum for the dissemination of new findings relating to melanoma. The aim of the Journal is to promote the level of informational exchange between those engaged in the field. Melanoma Research aims to encourage an informed and balanced view of experimental and clinical research and extend and stimulate communication and exchange of knowledge between investigators with differing areas of expertise. This will foster the development of translational research. The reporting of new clinical results and the effect and toxicity of new therapeutic agents and immunotherapy will be given emphasis by rapid publication of Short Communications. Thus, Melanoma Research seeks to present a coherent and up-to-date account of all aspects of investigations pertinent to melanoma. Consequently the scope of the Journal is broad, embracing the entire range of studies from fundamental and applied research in such subject areas as genetics, molecular biology, biochemistry, cell biology, photobiology, pathology, immunology, and advances in clinical oncology influencing the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of melanoma.