Flexed-Neck Flexible Nasolaryngoscopy for Evaluation of the Subglottis and Trachea in Children.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1002/ohn.1132
Jennifer M Siu, Nikolaus E Wolter, Meghan E Tepsich, Alexander M Treble, Samantha Goh, Alex J Osborn, Evan J Propst
{"title":"Flexed-Neck Flexible Nasolaryngoscopy for Evaluation of the Subglottis and Trachea in Children.","authors":"Jennifer M Siu, Nikolaus E Wolter, Meghan E Tepsich, Alexander M Treble, Samantha Goh, Alex J Osborn, Evan J Propst","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Determine if a flexed-neck posture during flexible nasolaryngoscopy (FNL) improves visualization of the subglottis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review of children undergoing FNL in the neutral (FNL) and flexed-neck (FN-FNL) positions.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary children's hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FNL was performed with each child's head in neutral and flexed-neck positions. Videos in each posture were captured and randomized. The most distal view of the subglottis in each position was evaluated with 4 rating scales: (1) subjective view (SV); of the subglottis and trachea, (2) airway grade (AG); most distal anatomical structure visualized, (3) airway area (AA); percentage of the subglottis visualized; and (4) modified Cormack-Lehane grade.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty children had 80 FNL views blindly evaluated by 5 pediatric otolaryngologists. The SV, AG, and AA were all significantly better with the neck flexed compared to a neutral position (7.3 vs 3.0, interquartile range [IQR]: 2.0-6.8, P < .001; 2.3 vs 1.5, IQR: 1.0-2.0, P < .001; 3.4 vs 1.7, IQR: 2.3-3.8, P = .001). There was no difference in the modified Cormack-Lehane grade between positions. Interrater reliability was excellent or strong (0.93-0.94, confidence interval: 0.91-0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FN-FNL is a simple maneuver performed in children undergoing FNL that partially improves the subjective visualization of the subglottis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1132","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Determine if a flexed-neck posture during flexible nasolaryngoscopy (FNL) improves visualization of the subglottis.

Study design: Retrospective review of children undergoing FNL in the neutral (FNL) and flexed-neck (FN-FNL) positions.

Setting: Tertiary children's hospital.

Methods: FNL was performed with each child's head in neutral and flexed-neck positions. Videos in each posture were captured and randomized. The most distal view of the subglottis in each position was evaluated with 4 rating scales: (1) subjective view (SV); of the subglottis and trachea, (2) airway grade (AG); most distal anatomical structure visualized, (3) airway area (AA); percentage of the subglottis visualized; and (4) modified Cormack-Lehane grade.

Results: Twenty children had 80 FNL views blindly evaluated by 5 pediatric otolaryngologists. The SV, AG, and AA were all significantly better with the neck flexed compared to a neutral position (7.3 vs 3.0, interquartile range [IQR]: 2.0-6.8, P < .001; 2.3 vs 1.5, IQR: 1.0-2.0, P < .001; 3.4 vs 1.7, IQR: 2.3-3.8, P = .001). There was no difference in the modified Cormack-Lehane grade between positions. Interrater reliability was excellent or strong (0.93-0.94, confidence interval: 0.91-0.93).

Conclusion: FN-FNL is a simple maneuver performed in children undergoing FNL that partially improves the subjective visualization of the subglottis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
软颈鼻喉镜对儿童声门下及气管的评估。
目的:确定柔性鼻咽喉镜检查(FNL)时颈部弯曲的姿势是否能改善声门下的可视化。研究设计:回顾性分析在中性体位(FNL)和屈颈体位(FN-FNL)下进行FNL的儿童。单位:三级儿童医院。方法:患儿头部均取中性位和屈颈位进行FNL。每种姿势的视频都被捕获并随机化。采用4种评定量表对声门下各体位的远端视点进行评定:(1)主观视点(SV);声门下和气管,(2)气道分级(AG);最远端解剖结构可见,(3)气道区域(AA);声门下可见的百分率;(4)改性Cormack-Lehane级。结果:20例患儿经5名儿科耳鼻喉科医师盲目评价FNL影像80张。与中立位相比,颈部屈曲时SV、AG和AA均显著改善(7.3 vs 3.0,四分位数间差[IQR]: 2.0-6.8, P)。结论:FNL -FNL是一种简单的手法,可部分改善声门下的主观视觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
期刊最新文献
Health-State Utility Values in Patients Affected by Flaccid and Non-Flaccid Facial Paralysis. Class III Congenital Middle Ear Anomalies: Refining the Teunissen-Cremers Classification Based on Stapes Suprastructure Viability. Nasal Corticosteroid Delivery Methods in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Polyps: A Systematic Review. Congenital Pyriform Aperture Stenosis: Not All Patients Require Open Repair. Time-Driven Activity Based Costing of an Annual Canadian Cochlear Implant Program.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1