Improving readability in AI-generated medical information on fragility fractures: the role of prompt wording on ChatGPT's responses.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Osteoporosis International Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1007/s00198-024-07358-0
Hakan Akkan, Gulce Kallem Seyyar
{"title":"Improving readability in AI-generated medical information on fragility fractures: the role of prompt wording on ChatGPT's responses.","authors":"Hakan Akkan, Gulce Kallem Seyyar","doi":"10.1007/s00198-024-07358-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding how the questions used when interacting with chatbots impact the readability of the generated text is essential for effective health communication. Using descriptive queries instead of just keywords during interaction with ChatGPT results in more readable and understandable answers about fragility fractures.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Large language models like ChatGPT can enhance patients' understanding of medical information, making health decisions more accessible. Complex terms, such as \"fragility fracture,\" can confuse patients, so presenting its medical content in plain language is crucial. This study explored whether conversational prompts improve readability and understanding compared to keyword-based prompts when generating patient-centered health information on fragility fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 32 most frequently searched keywords related to \"fragility fracture\" and \"osteoporotic fracture\" were identified using Google Trends. From this set, 24 keywords were selected based on relevance and entered sequentially into ChatGPT. Each keyword was tested with two prompt types: (1) plain language with keywords embedded and (2) keywords alone. The readability and comprehensibility of the AI-generated responses were assessed using the Flesch-Kincaid reading ease (FKRE) and Flesch-Kincaid grade level (FKGL), respectively. The scores of the responses were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FKRE scores indicated significantly higher readability with plain language prompts (median 34.35) compared to keyword-only prompts (median 23.60). Similarly, the FKGL indicated a lower grade level for plain language prompts (median 12.05) versus keyword-only (median 14.50), with both differences achieving statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that using conversational prompts can enhance the readability of AI-generated medical information on fragility fractures. Clinicians and content creators should consider this approach when using AI for patient education to optimize comprehension.</p>","PeriodicalId":19638,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoporosis International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-024-07358-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding how the questions used when interacting with chatbots impact the readability of the generated text is essential for effective health communication. Using descriptive queries instead of just keywords during interaction with ChatGPT results in more readable and understandable answers about fragility fractures.

Purpose: Large language models like ChatGPT can enhance patients' understanding of medical information, making health decisions more accessible. Complex terms, such as "fragility fracture," can confuse patients, so presenting its medical content in plain language is crucial. This study explored whether conversational prompts improve readability and understanding compared to keyword-based prompts when generating patient-centered health information on fragility fractures.

Methods: The 32 most frequently searched keywords related to "fragility fracture" and "osteoporotic fracture" were identified using Google Trends. From this set, 24 keywords were selected based on relevance and entered sequentially into ChatGPT. Each keyword was tested with two prompt types: (1) plain language with keywords embedded and (2) keywords alone. The readability and comprehensibility of the AI-generated responses were assessed using the Flesch-Kincaid reading ease (FKRE) and Flesch-Kincaid grade level (FKGL), respectively. The scores of the responses were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test.

Results: The FKRE scores indicated significantly higher readability with plain language prompts (median 34.35) compared to keyword-only prompts (median 23.60). Similarly, the FKGL indicated a lower grade level for plain language prompts (median 12.05) versus keyword-only (median 14.50), with both differences achieving statistical significance.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that using conversational prompts can enhance the readability of AI-generated medical information on fragility fractures. Clinicians and content creators should consider this approach when using AI for patient education to optimize comprehension.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高人工智能生成的脆性骨折医疗信息的可读性:即时措辞在ChatGPT回复中的作用
了解与聊天机器人交互时使用的问题如何影响生成文本的可读性,对于有效的健康沟通至关重要。在与ChatGPT交互期间,使用描述性查询而不仅仅是关键字,可以得到关于脆弱性断裂的更可读和可理解的答案。目的:ChatGPT等大型语言模型可以增强患者对医疗信息的理解,使健康决策更容易获得。复杂的术语,如“脆性骨折”,可能会使患者感到困惑,因此用通俗易懂的语言呈现其医学内容至关重要。本研究探讨了当生成以患者为中心的脆性骨折健康信息时,会话提示是否比基于关键字的提示能提高可读性和理解力。方法:利用谷歌Trends对“脆性骨折”和“骨质疏松性骨折”相关的32个搜索频率最高的关键词进行识别。从这个集合中,根据相关度选择24个关键词,依次输入ChatGPT。每个关键词用两种提示类型进行测试:(1)嵌入关键词的普通语言和(2)单独的关键词。采用Flesch-Kincaid阅读难度(FKRE)和Flesch-Kincaid等级水平(FKGL)分别评估人工智能生成的回答的可读性和可理解性。使用曼-惠特尼U测试比较回答的得分。结果:FKRE评分显示,与仅使用关键字的提示相比,使用普通语言提示的可读性显著提高(中位数34.35)。同样,FKGL显示,普通语言提示(中位数12.05)比仅关键字提示(中位数14.50)的等级水平较低,两种差异均具有统计学意义。结论:我们的研究结果表明,使用会话提示可以提高人工智能生成的脆性骨折医疗信息的可读性。临床医生和内容创作者在使用人工智能进行患者教育以优化理解时应该考虑这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Osteoporosis International
Osteoporosis International 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: An international multi-disciplinary journal which is a joint initiative between the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, Osteoporosis International provides a forum for the communication and exchange of current ideas concerning the diagnosis, prevention, treatment and management of osteoporosis and other metabolic bone diseases. It publishes: original papers - reporting progress and results in all areas of osteoporosis and its related fields; review articles - reflecting the present state of knowledge in special areas of summarizing limited themes in which discussion has led to clearly defined conclusions; educational articles - giving information on the progress of a topic of particular interest; case reports - of uncommon or interesting presentations of the condition. While focusing on clinical research, the Journal will also accept submissions on more basic aspects of research, where they are considered by the editors to be relevant to the human disease spectrum.
期刊最新文献
Bridging the gap: enhancing osteoporosis management through AI-driven predictive models. Metaphyseal comminution in distal radius fractures: a predictor of secondary fragility fractures and the role of osteoporosis treatment. Time trend analysis of osteoporosis prevalence among adults 50 years of age and older in the USA, 2005-2018. Ultra-processed food intake and prevalence of osteoporosis in US adults aged 50 years and older: a cross-sectional analysis. Focal dermal hypoplasia: a probable underrecognized low bone mass disorder secondary to aberrant Wnt signaling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1