Alexandria N Albers, Sarah Y Michels, Matthew F Daley, Jason M Glanz, Sophia R Newcomer
{"title":"Invalid Vaccine Doses Among Children Aged 0 to 35 Months: 2011 to 2020.","authors":"Alexandria N Albers, Sarah Y Michels, Matthew F Daley, Jason M Glanz, Sophia R Newcomer","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-068341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p></p><p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Vaccine doses provided outside the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for minimum and maximum ages of vaccination and minimum intervals between doses are considered invalid. Our objective was to quantify the prevalence of and factors associated with invalid doses among US children aged 0 to 35 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed provider-verified vaccination records from the nationally representative 2011-2020 National Immunization Survey-Child. We quantified the number of children with at least 1 invalid vaccine dose overall, by survey year, and by vaccine type. Among children who received vaccine doses before the minimum age or minimum dose interval, we quantified the prevalence of receiving extra doses such that series were completed with the recommended number of valid doses. We used logistic regression models to identify factors associated with receipt of an invalid vaccination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 161 187 children, 22 209 (weighted percent: 15.4%, 95% CI, 15.0%-15.8%) had an invalid vaccine dose. Of children with a minimum age or minimum interval invalid dose, 44.9% (95% CI, 43.2%-46.6%) received extra doses and completed the series. The highest prevalence of invalid doses was for 3-dose rotavirus (n = 5733, 4.4%), with the first dose being administered after the maximum age (n = 3996, 3.1%). Overall, the percentage of children with an invalid dose decreased from 2011 (16.9%) to 2020 (12.5%). Children who moved across state lines vs not (adjusted odds ratio: 1.5 [95% CI, 1.4-1.6]) had higher odds of an invalid vaccine dose.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although invalid vaccine doses have decreased over time, many children with invalid doses lacked the doses necessary to complete a vaccine series.</p>","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-068341","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Vaccine doses provided outside the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for minimum and maximum ages of vaccination and minimum intervals between doses are considered invalid. Our objective was to quantify the prevalence of and factors associated with invalid doses among US children aged 0 to 35 months.
Methods: We analyzed provider-verified vaccination records from the nationally representative 2011-2020 National Immunization Survey-Child. We quantified the number of children with at least 1 invalid vaccine dose overall, by survey year, and by vaccine type. Among children who received vaccine doses before the minimum age or minimum dose interval, we quantified the prevalence of receiving extra doses such that series were completed with the recommended number of valid doses. We used logistic regression models to identify factors associated with receipt of an invalid vaccination.
Results: Of 161 187 children, 22 209 (weighted percent: 15.4%, 95% CI, 15.0%-15.8%) had an invalid vaccine dose. Of children with a minimum age or minimum interval invalid dose, 44.9% (95% CI, 43.2%-46.6%) received extra doses and completed the series. The highest prevalence of invalid doses was for 3-dose rotavirus (n = 5733, 4.4%), with the first dose being administered after the maximum age (n = 3996, 3.1%). Overall, the percentage of children with an invalid dose decreased from 2011 (16.9%) to 2020 (12.5%). Children who moved across state lines vs not (adjusted odds ratio: 1.5 [95% CI, 1.4-1.6]) had higher odds of an invalid vaccine dose.
Conclusions: Although invalid vaccine doses have decreased over time, many children with invalid doses lacked the doses necessary to complete a vaccine series.
期刊介绍:
The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field.
The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability.
Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights.
As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.