Invalid Vaccine Doses Among Children Aged 0 to 35 Months: 2011 to 2020.

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1542/peds.2024-068341
Alexandria N Albers, Sarah Y Michels, Matthew F Daley, Jason M Glanz, Sophia R Newcomer
{"title":"Invalid Vaccine Doses Among Children Aged 0 to 35 Months: 2011 to 2020.","authors":"Alexandria N Albers, Sarah Y Michels, Matthew F Daley, Jason M Glanz, Sophia R Newcomer","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-068341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p></p><p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Vaccine doses provided outside the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for minimum and maximum ages of vaccination and minimum intervals between doses are considered invalid. Our objective was to quantify the prevalence of and factors associated with invalid doses among US children aged 0 to 35 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed provider-verified vaccination records from the nationally representative 2011-2020 National Immunization Survey-Child. We quantified the number of children with at least 1 invalid vaccine dose overall, by survey year, and by vaccine type. Among children who received vaccine doses before the minimum age or minimum dose interval, we quantified the prevalence of receiving extra doses such that series were completed with the recommended number of valid doses. We used logistic regression models to identify factors associated with receipt of an invalid vaccination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 161 187 children, 22 209 (weighted percent: 15.4%, 95% CI, 15.0%-15.8%) had an invalid vaccine dose. Of children with a minimum age or minimum interval invalid dose, 44.9% (95% CI, 43.2%-46.6%) received extra doses and completed the series. The highest prevalence of invalid doses was for 3-dose rotavirus (n = 5733, 4.4%), with the first dose being administered after the maximum age (n = 3996, 3.1%). Overall, the percentage of children with an invalid dose decreased from 2011 (16.9%) to 2020 (12.5%). Children who moved across state lines vs not (adjusted odds ratio: 1.5 [95% CI, 1.4-1.6]) had higher odds of an invalid vaccine dose.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although invalid vaccine doses have decreased over time, many children with invalid doses lacked the doses necessary to complete a vaccine series.</p>","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-068341","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Vaccine doses provided outside the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for minimum and maximum ages of vaccination and minimum intervals between doses are considered invalid. Our objective was to quantify the prevalence of and factors associated with invalid doses among US children aged 0 to 35 months.

Methods: We analyzed provider-verified vaccination records from the nationally representative 2011-2020 National Immunization Survey-Child. We quantified the number of children with at least 1 invalid vaccine dose overall, by survey year, and by vaccine type. Among children who received vaccine doses before the minimum age or minimum dose interval, we quantified the prevalence of receiving extra doses such that series were completed with the recommended number of valid doses. We used logistic regression models to identify factors associated with receipt of an invalid vaccination.

Results: Of 161 187 children, 22 209 (weighted percent: 15.4%, 95% CI, 15.0%-15.8%) had an invalid vaccine dose. Of children with a minimum age or minimum interval invalid dose, 44.9% (95% CI, 43.2%-46.6%) received extra doses and completed the series. The highest prevalence of invalid doses was for 3-dose rotavirus (n = 5733, 4.4%), with the first dose being administered after the maximum age (n = 3996, 3.1%). Overall, the percentage of children with an invalid dose decreased from 2011 (16.9%) to 2020 (12.5%). Children who moved across state lines vs not (adjusted odds ratio: 1.5 [95% CI, 1.4-1.6]) had higher odds of an invalid vaccine dose.

Conclusions: Although invalid vaccine doses have decreased over time, many children with invalid doses lacked the doses necessary to complete a vaccine series.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2011年至2020年0至35个月儿童的无效疫苗剂量。
背景和目的:在免疫实践咨询委员会以外提供的疫苗剂量,对于最低和最高接种年龄以及剂量之间的最短间隔,被认为是无效的。我们的目的是量化美国0至35个月儿童中无效剂量的患病率和相关因素。方法:我们分析了2011-2020年全国代表性全国免疫调查儿童中经提供者验证的疫苗接种记录。我们按调查年份和疫苗类型量化了至少接种1剂无效疫苗的儿童总数。在最小年龄或最小剂量间隔之前接受疫苗剂量的儿童中,我们量化了接受额外剂量的流行程度,以便在推荐的有效剂量数量下完成一系列接种。我们使用逻辑回归模型来确定与接种无效疫苗相关的因素。结果:在161 187名儿童中,22 209名(加权百分比:15.4%,95% CI: 15.0%-15.8%)接种了无效疫苗剂量。在最小年龄或最小间隔无效剂量的儿童中,44.9% (95% CI, 43.2%-46.6%)接受了额外剂量并完成了该系列。无效剂量患病率最高的是3剂轮状病毒(n = 5733, 4.4%),第一剂是在最大年龄之后接种的(n = 3996, 3.1%)。总体而言,接种无效剂量的儿童百分比从2011年(16.9%)下降到2020年(12.5%)。跨州儿童与非跨州儿童(校正优势比:1.5 [95% CI, 1.4-1.6])接种无效疫苗的几率更高。结论:尽管无效疫苗的剂量随着时间的推移而减少,但许多接种无效疫苗的儿童缺乏完成一系列疫苗接种所需的剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatrics
Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
791
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field. The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability. Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights. As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.
期刊最新文献
ADHD Prescription Patterns: Paying Attention to Trends. Prescription Stimulant Dispensing to US Children: 2017-2023. Academic Achievement of Children With Neurofibromatosis Type 1. October 2024 ACIP Meeting Update: Influenza, COVID-19, RSV and Other Vaccines. Late-Onset Sepsis Among Extremely Preterm Infants During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1