Memory load influences our preparedness to act on visual representations in working memory without affecting their accessibility

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Progress in Neurobiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2025.102717
Rose Nasrawi, Mika Mautner-Rohde, Freek van Ede
{"title":"Memory load influences our preparedness to act on visual representations in working memory without affecting their accessibility","authors":"Rose Nasrawi,&nbsp;Mika Mautner-Rohde,&nbsp;Freek van Ede","doi":"10.1016/j.pneurobio.2025.102717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>It is well established that when we hold more content in working memory, we are slower to act upon part of that content when it becomes relevant for behavior. Here, we asked whether this load-related slowing is due to slower access to the sensory representations held in working memory (as predicted by serial working-memory search), or by a reduced preparedness to act upon those sensory representations once accessed. To address this, we designed a visual-motor working-memory task in which participants memorized the orientation of two or four colored bars, of which one was cued for reproduction. We independently tracked EEG markers associated with the selection of visual (cued item location) and motor (relevant manual action) information from the EEG time-frequency signal, and compared their latencies as a function of memory load. We confirm slower memory-guided behavior with higher working-memory load and show that this is associated with delayed motor selection. In contrast, we find no evidence for a concomitant delay in the latency of visual selection. Moreover, we show that variability in decision times within each memory-load condition is associated with corresponding changes in the latency of motor, but not visual selection. These results reveal how memory load affects our preparedness to act on sensory representations in working memory, while leaving sensory access itself unaffected. This posits action readiness as a key factor that shapes the speed of memory-guided behavior and that underlies delayed responding with higher working-memory load.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20851,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Neurobiology","volume":"245 ","pages":"Article 102717"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301008225000085","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is well established that when we hold more content in working memory, we are slower to act upon part of that content when it becomes relevant for behavior. Here, we asked whether this load-related slowing is due to slower access to the sensory representations held in working memory (as predicted by serial working-memory search), or by a reduced preparedness to act upon those sensory representations once accessed. To address this, we designed a visual-motor working-memory task in which participants memorized the orientation of two or four colored bars, of which one was cued for reproduction. We independently tracked EEG markers associated with the selection of visual (cued item location) and motor (relevant manual action) information from the EEG time-frequency signal, and compared their latencies as a function of memory load. We confirm slower memory-guided behavior with higher working-memory load and show that this is associated with delayed motor selection. In contrast, we find no evidence for a concomitant delay in the latency of visual selection. Moreover, we show that variability in decision times within each memory-load condition is associated with corresponding changes in the latency of motor, but not visual selection. These results reveal how memory load affects our preparedness to act on sensory representations in working memory, while leaving sensory access itself unaffected. This posits action readiness as a key factor that shapes the speed of memory-guided behavior and that underlies delayed responding with higher working-memory load.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
记忆负荷影响我们对工作记忆中的视觉表征采取行动的准备,而不影响其可及性。
众所周知,当我们在工作记忆中拥有更多的内容时,当这些内容与行为相关时,我们对其中一部分的行动就会变慢。在这里,我们询问这种与负荷相关的减速是由于对工作记忆中保存的感觉表征的访问速度较慢(正如串行工作记忆搜索所预测的那样),还是由于一旦访问了这些感觉表征,对这些感觉表征采取行动的准备程度降低。为了解决这个问题,我们设计了一个视觉运动工作记忆任务,在这个任务中,参与者记住两个或四个彩色条的方向,其中一个是提示复制的。我们独立追踪了与脑电时频信号中视觉(提示物品位置)和运动(相关手动动作)信息选择相关的脑电标记,并比较了它们的潜伏期与记忆负荷的关系。我们确认较慢的记忆引导行为具有较高的工作记忆负荷,并表明这与延迟的运动选择有关。相反,我们发现没有证据表明视觉选择的延迟会伴随延迟。此外,我们表明,在每个记忆负荷条件下,决策时间的变化与运动延迟的相应变化有关,而与视觉选择无关。这些结果揭示了记忆负荷如何影响我们在工作记忆中对感觉表征采取行动的准备,而感觉访问本身不受影响。这表明行动准备是决定记忆引导行为速度的关键因素,也是高工作记忆负荷下延迟反应的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Neurobiology
Progress in Neurobiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
1.50%
发文量
107
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Progress in Neurobiology is an international journal that publishes groundbreaking original research, comprehensive review articles and opinion pieces written by leading researchers. The journal welcomes contributions from the broad field of neuroscience that apply neurophysiological, biochemical, pharmacological, molecular biological, anatomical, computational and behavioral analyses to problems of molecular, cellular, developmental, systems, and clinical neuroscience.
期刊最新文献
The correct connectivity of the DG-CA3 circuits involved in declarative memory processes depends on Vangl2-dependent planar cell polarity signaling. Editorial Board Cyto-, gene, and multireceptor architecture of the early postnatal mouse hippocampal complex Social odors drive hippocampal CA2 place cell responses to social stimuli Face pareidolia minimally engages macaque face selective neurons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1