Emerging Trends in Research on Assisted Outpatient Treatment in the United States: A Narrative Review.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Psychiatric services Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.20240190
Chad J Valasek, Kris L Nelson, Danielle L Fettes, David H Sommerfeld
{"title":"Emerging Trends in Research on Assisted Outpatient Treatment in the United States: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Chad J Valasek, Kris L Nelson, Danielle L Fettes, David H Sommerfeld","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20240190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The use of court-ordered mental health treatment through programs such as assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) carries substantial ramifications for the welfare of individuals with serious mental health conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this review, the authors used a narrative methodology and performed an interpretive synthesis of existing U.S.-based literature (2008-2023) on AOT implementation and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 21 peer-reviewed articles published between 2009 and 2022 that assessed various aspects and outcomes of AOT. Although many of these studies generally supported the use of AOT, most used a limited data set (i.e., AOT program data from New York or Ohio between 1999 and 2007). Much of the latest research on AOT did not include attention to possible mechanisms to explain observed outcomes. The emerging literature suggests that increased outreach and less coercive tactics may lead to better outpatient treatment outcomes. However, more research, especially from the point of view of individuals enrolled in AOT programs, is needed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The authors strongly recommend that research into these interventions be broadened and include more geographic locations. A greater emphasis should be placed on identifying potential disparities, developing a better understanding of AOT-specific mechanisms of change, and continuing efforts to identify and use high-quality comparison groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":" ","pages":"appips20240190"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric services","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20240190","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The use of court-ordered mental health treatment through programs such as assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) carries substantial ramifications for the welfare of individuals with serious mental health conditions.

Methods: In this review, the authors used a narrative methodology and performed an interpretive synthesis of existing U.S.-based literature (2008-2023) on AOT implementation and outcomes.

Results: The search yielded 21 peer-reviewed articles published between 2009 and 2022 that assessed various aspects and outcomes of AOT. Although many of these studies generally supported the use of AOT, most used a limited data set (i.e., AOT program data from New York or Ohio between 1999 and 2007). Much of the latest research on AOT did not include attention to possible mechanisms to explain observed outcomes. The emerging literature suggests that increased outreach and less coercive tactics may lead to better outpatient treatment outcomes. However, more research, especially from the point of view of individuals enrolled in AOT programs, is needed.

Conclusions: The authors strongly recommend that research into these interventions be broadened and include more geographic locations. A greater emphasis should be placed on identifying potential disparities, developing a better understanding of AOT-specific mechanisms of change, and continuing efforts to identify and use high-quality comparison groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国辅助门诊治疗研究的新趋势:叙述性回顾。
目的:通过辅助门诊治疗(AOT)等项目使用法院命令的精神健康治疗,对患有严重精神健康状况的个体的福利产生了实质性的影响。方法:在本综述中,作者采用叙事方法,并对现有的美国文献(2008-2023)进行了解释性综合。结果:搜索产生了2009年至2022年间发表的21篇同行评议文章,评估了辅助门诊治疗的各个方面和结果。虽然这些研究大多支持辅助门诊的使用,但大多数使用的是有限的数据集(即1999年至2007年期间纽约或俄亥俄州的辅助门诊项目数据)。许多关于辅助治疗的最新研究都没有关注解释观察到的结果的可能机制。新出现的文献表明,增加外展和较少的强制策略可能导致更好的门诊治疗结果。然而,需要更多的研究,特别是从参加辅助门诊治疗项目的个人的角度来看。结论:作者强烈建议扩大对这些干预措施的研究,包括更多的地理位置。应该更加强调确定潜在的差异,更好地了解aot特有的变化机制,并继续努力确定和使用高质量的比较组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatric services
Psychiatric services 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
295
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatric Services, established in 1950, is published monthly by the American Psychiatric Association. The peer-reviewed journal features research reports on issues related to the delivery of mental health services, especially for people with serious mental illness in community-based treatment programs. Long known as an interdisciplinary journal, Psychiatric Services recognizes that provision of high-quality care involves collaboration among a variety of professionals, frequently working as a team. Authors of research reports published in the journal include psychiatrists, psychologists, pharmacists, nurses, social workers, drug and alcohol treatment counselors, economists, policy analysts, and professionals in related systems such as criminal justice and welfare systems. In the mental health field, the current focus on patient-centered, recovery-oriented care and on dissemination of evidence-based practices is transforming service delivery systems at all levels. Research published in Psychiatric Services contributes to this transformation.
期刊最新文献
Quality of Psychiatric Care for Immigrants and People With a Non-English Language Preference: A Systematic Scoping Review. The Call to Increase Adoption of Family-Based Interventions in Global Mental Health Programming. Changes in Recovery Assessment Scale Scores During a Treatment Episode Among Patients in a Large Behavioral Health Care System. Lessons From Implementing Research-Supported Practices to Address Psychiatric Illnesses in Two Countries. Medical Mistrust and Willingness to Use Mental Health Services Among a Cohort of Black Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1