Exploring the readiness to practice of underrepresented healthcare workers: A scoping review.

IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL SAGE Open Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20503121241312532
Sara Hussein, Liam Ishaky, Behdin Nowrouzi-Kia, Sarah Laughton, Basem Gohar
{"title":"Exploring the readiness to practice of underrepresented healthcare workers: A scoping review.","authors":"Sara Hussein, Liam Ishaky, Behdin Nowrouzi-Kia, Sarah Laughton, Basem Gohar","doi":"10.1177/20503121241312532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies across the extant literature suggest that less-experienced healthcare workers are more likely to experience adverse outcomes such as burnout, sick leaves, or intend to leave the profession. Thus, one's readiness to practice is an important element that requires more attention. While extensive research exists on the readiness of certain professions like nurses, a notable gap remains concerning other healthcare workers.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study sought to explore studies examining readiness to practice among various underrepresented healthcare workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review to determine the available research related to clinical and nonclinical areas related to the readiness to practice of healthcare workers, excluding physicians and nurses. We examined three databases, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO, from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2023. Our search focused on readiness to practice among various healthcare professions, whether clinically focused or broadly related to professionalism.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search identified 41 articles meeting the inclusion criteria from several professions, including but not limited to physiotherapists and occupational therapists, pharmacists, osteopaths/chiropractors, and social workers. Overall, studies differed in assessing readiness to practice with a broad range of identified clinical competencies that varied between professions and regions. Nonclinical skills, such as communication, conflict management, and cultural competence, were common barriers across professions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the heterogeneity in job roles, work settings, and geographical reasons, there is evidence to suggest that new healthcare professionals may be clinically adept but may be lacking in other nonclinical skills that could affect their work and well-being. With early-career healthcare workers particularly vulnerable to adverse outcomes in the workplace, future research should standardize core competencies, including nonclinical skills and well-being-related activities, as a prevention method across various health groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":21398,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Medicine","volume":"13 ","pages":"20503121241312532"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11713961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121241312532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Studies across the extant literature suggest that less-experienced healthcare workers are more likely to experience adverse outcomes such as burnout, sick leaves, or intend to leave the profession. Thus, one's readiness to practice is an important element that requires more attention. While extensive research exists on the readiness of certain professions like nurses, a notable gap remains concerning other healthcare workers.

Purpose: This study sought to explore studies examining readiness to practice among various underrepresented healthcare workers.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review to determine the available research related to clinical and nonclinical areas related to the readiness to practice of healthcare workers, excluding physicians and nurses. We examined three databases, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO, from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2023. Our search focused on readiness to practice among various healthcare professions, whether clinically focused or broadly related to professionalism.

Results: Our search identified 41 articles meeting the inclusion criteria from several professions, including but not limited to physiotherapists and occupational therapists, pharmacists, osteopaths/chiropractors, and social workers. Overall, studies differed in assessing readiness to practice with a broad range of identified clinical competencies that varied between professions and regions. Nonclinical skills, such as communication, conflict management, and cultural competence, were common barriers across professions.

Conclusion: Despite the heterogeneity in job roles, work settings, and geographical reasons, there is evidence to suggest that new healthcare professionals may be clinically adept but may be lacking in other nonclinical skills that could affect their work and well-being. With early-career healthcare workers particularly vulnerable to adverse outcomes in the workplace, future research should standardize core competencies, including nonclinical skills and well-being-related activities, as a prevention method across various health groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索代表性不足的卫生保健工作者的实践准备:范围审查。
背景:现有文献的研究表明,经验不足的卫生保健工作者更有可能经历不良后果,如倦怠、病假或打算离开这个行业。因此,一个人对练习的准备是一个需要更多关注的重要因素。虽然对某些职业(如护士)的准备情况进行了广泛的研究,但其他卫生保健工作者仍然存在显着差距。目的:本研究旨在探讨各种代表性不足的卫生保健工作者的实践准备情况。方法:我们进行了一项范围审查,以确定与医疗工作者(不包括医生和护士)准备实践相关的临床和非临床领域的现有研究。我们检索了2000年1月1日至2023年12月31日的MEDLINE、CINAHL和PsycINFO三个数据库。我们的研究集中在各种医疗保健专业的实践准备情况,无论是临床重点还是与专业精神广泛相关。结果:我们的检索确定了41篇符合纳入标准的文章,这些文章来自多个专业,包括但不限于物理治疗师和职业治疗师、药剂师、整骨治疗师/脊医和社会工作者。总体而言,研究在评估实践准备程度方面存在差异,这些实践准备程度在不同专业和地区之间存在广泛的临床能力差异。非临床技能,如沟通、冲突管理和文化能力,是跨职业的常见障碍。结论:尽管工作角色、工作环境和地理原因存在异质性,但有证据表明,新的医疗保健专业人员可能在临床上熟练,但可能缺乏其他可能影响其工作和福祉的非临床技能。由于早期职业保健工作者特别容易受到工作场所不良后果的影响,未来的研究应使核心能力标准化,包括非临床技能和与福祉相关的活动,作为不同健康群体的预防方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SAGE Open Medicine
SAGE Open Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
289
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Epidemiology, clinical manifestation, diagnosis,and treatment of bursitis iliopectinea: A systematic review. Experiences and overall impact reported by people living with obesity: results from a multinational study. Long-term sublingual bacterial immunotherapy prevents ear, nose and throat infections: A real-life study. 1990-2041 Global burden of Burkitt lymphoma with 20 years forecast: A systematic analysis using the global burden disease of study of 2021. Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms after recovery from COVID-19: A questionnaire-based study in the Aseer region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1