A Sponsor's Best Practice and Operating Principles to Manage Data Monitoring Committees.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1007/s43441-025-00742-w
Malene Muusfeldt Birck, Josephine Skovgaard Rasmussen, Ida Carøe Helmark, Karsten Lollike
{"title":"A Sponsor's Best Practice and Operating Principles to Manage Data Monitoring Committees.","authors":"Malene Muusfeldt Birck, Josephine Skovgaard Rasmussen, Ida Carøe Helmark, Karsten Lollike","doi":"10.1007/s43441-025-00742-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of data monitoring committees (DMC) to safeguard patients' safety in clinical trials has evolved over the last decades and has become increasingly common. To ensure well-operating and high-performing DMCs, pharmaceutical companies need to establish clearly defined operational processes while continuously seeking to optimize these and adapt to the needs of drug development. Although there are health authority guidelines on establishing and managing a DMC, the perspectives and experiences of sponsors are often underrepresented. This publication shares insights on a sponsor, Novo Nordisk (NN), regarding principles and practices for DMC establishment and management across varying trial types and therapeutic areas, including challenges and solutions. Highlighting NN's structured and successful approach to DMCs, it details clearly defined roles and responsibilities that ensure productive DMC meetings and high-quality data for the DMC. Additionally, NN's practices for clear, transparent, and trustful communication between the sponsor, the DMC, and the independent external statistical vendor are described. Processes for quality control, internal audits, and learnings from inspections and how these are incorporated for continuous improvement of the DMC process are discussed. While the processes and practices described are primarily designed for medium and large pharmaceutical companies, certain aspects may also be relevant and beneficial for smaller companies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00742-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of data monitoring committees (DMC) to safeguard patients' safety in clinical trials has evolved over the last decades and has become increasingly common. To ensure well-operating and high-performing DMCs, pharmaceutical companies need to establish clearly defined operational processes while continuously seeking to optimize these and adapt to the needs of drug development. Although there are health authority guidelines on establishing and managing a DMC, the perspectives and experiences of sponsors are often underrepresented. This publication shares insights on a sponsor, Novo Nordisk (NN), regarding principles and practices for DMC establishment and management across varying trial types and therapeutic areas, including challenges and solutions. Highlighting NN's structured and successful approach to DMCs, it details clearly defined roles and responsibilities that ensure productive DMC meetings and high-quality data for the DMC. Additionally, NN's practices for clear, transparent, and trustful communication between the sponsor, the DMC, and the independent external statistical vendor are described. Processes for quality control, internal audits, and learnings from inspections and how these are incorporated for continuous improvement of the DMC process are discussed. While the processes and practices described are primarily designed for medium and large pharmaceutical companies, certain aspects may also be relevant and beneficial for smaller companies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
赞助商管理数据监控委员会的最佳实践和操作原则。
使用数据监测委员会(DMC)来保护临床试验中患者的安全已经发展了几十年,并且变得越来越普遍。为了确保dmc的良好运行和高绩效,制药公司需要建立明确定义的操作流程,同时不断寻求优化这些流程并适应药物开发的需求。尽管卫生当局有关于建立和管理DMC的指导方针,但赞助者的观点和经验往往代表性不足。本出版物分享了赞助商诺和诺德(NN)关于不同试验类型和治疗领域DMC建立和管理的原则和实践,包括挑战和解决方案的见解。它强调了NN对DMC的结构化和成功的方法,详细说明了明确定义的角色和职责,以确保DMC会议的生产性和DMC的高质量数据。此外,还描述了NN在发起人、DMC和独立的外部统计供应商之间进行清晰、透明和信任的沟通的实践。讨论了质量控制、内部审计和从检查中学习的过程,以及如何将这些过程纳入DMC过程的持续改进。虽然所描述的过程和做法主要是为中型和大型制药公司设计的,但某些方面也可能与小型公司相关并有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
期刊最新文献
Impact of Rule 11 on the European Medical Software Landscape: Analysis of EUDAMED and Further Databases Three Years After MDR Implementation. Basic Considerations for Data Pooling Strategy in Multi-Regional Clinical Trials (MRCTs). Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development by Overcoming Existing Differences in Regional Regulatory Requirements - Outcomes of a Descriptive Review. A Consistent Lack of Consistency: Definitions, Evidentiary Expectations and Potential Use of Meaningful Change Data in Clinical Outcome Assessments Across Stakeholders. Results from a DIA Working Group Literature Review and Survey. A Five-Year Analysis of Market Share and Sales Growth for Original Drugs after Patent Expiration in Korea.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1