Evaluating postoperative complications in standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones larger than 2 cm: a retrospective study utilizing the E-PASS scoring system.

IF 2 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urolithiasis Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1007/s00240-024-01689-7
Mucahit Gelmis, Berk Bulut, Mustafa Gokhan Kose, Serkan Gonultas, Ali Ayten, Burak Arslan
{"title":"Evaluating postoperative complications in standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones larger than 2 cm: a retrospective study utilizing the E-PASS scoring system.","authors":"Mucahit Gelmis, Berk Bulut, Mustafa Gokhan Kose, Serkan Gonultas, Ali Ayten, Burak Arslan","doi":"10.1007/s00240-024-01689-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a widely preferred method for treating complex kidney stones, particularly in patients with larger or more complicated stones. Despite its advantages, such as minimal invasiveness and a shorter recovery time, postoperative complications can occur, thereby necessitating effective risk assessment tools to identify at-risk patients. This study evaluated the Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) scoring system's utility in predicting postoperative complications following standard PCNL. This retrospective study included 218 patients who underwent standard PCNL from June 2020 to August 2024 at our institution. Data on demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative factors were collected and analyzed. Postoperative complications were classified using the modified Clavien-Dindo system. The E-PASS scoring system, which incorporates the Preoperative Risk Score (PRS), Surgical Stress Score (SSS), and Comprehensive Risk Score (CRS), was applied to stratify risk. Postoperative complications occurred in 38 patients (17.4%). Significant predictors included advanced age, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, and comorbidities like diabetes and coronary artery disease. Intraoperative factors, such as prolonged operative times, number of access and greater blood loss, were also associated with complications. Multivariate analysis identified higher CRS and greater stone burden as independent predictors (p = 0.012 and p = 0.037, respectively). The CRS demonstrated moderate discrimination, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.747. The E-PASS scoring system effectively predicts postoperative complications in PCNL, underscoring the importance of thorough preoperative and intraoperative evaluation. Future studies should explore its broader applicability across other urological procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01689-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a widely preferred method for treating complex kidney stones, particularly in patients with larger or more complicated stones. Despite its advantages, such as minimal invasiveness and a shorter recovery time, postoperative complications can occur, thereby necessitating effective risk assessment tools to identify at-risk patients. This study evaluated the Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) scoring system's utility in predicting postoperative complications following standard PCNL. This retrospective study included 218 patients who underwent standard PCNL from June 2020 to August 2024 at our institution. Data on demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative factors were collected and analyzed. Postoperative complications were classified using the modified Clavien-Dindo system. The E-PASS scoring system, which incorporates the Preoperative Risk Score (PRS), Surgical Stress Score (SSS), and Comprehensive Risk Score (CRS), was applied to stratify risk. Postoperative complications occurred in 38 patients (17.4%). Significant predictors included advanced age, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, and comorbidities like diabetes and coronary artery disease. Intraoperative factors, such as prolonged operative times, number of access and greater blood loss, were also associated with complications. Multivariate analysis identified higher CRS and greater stone burden as independent predictors (p = 0.012 and p = 0.037, respectively). The CRS demonstrated moderate discrimination, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.747. The E-PASS scoring system effectively predicts postoperative complications in PCNL, underscoring the importance of thorough preoperative and intraoperative evaluation. Future studies should explore its broader applicability across other urological procedures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗大于2cm肾结石的术后并发症:一项利用E-PASS评分系统的回顾性研究。
经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)是治疗复杂肾结石的广泛首选方法,特别是对于较大或更复杂的肾结石患者。尽管具有微创、恢复时间短等优点,但术后可能出现并发症,因此需要有效的风险评估工具来识别高危患者。本研究评估了生理能力和手术压力评估(E-PASS)评分系统在预测标准PCNL术后并发症中的应用。本回顾性研究纳入了2020年6月至2024年8月在我院接受标准PCNL的218例患者。收集和分析人口统计学、合并症和围手术期因素的数据。采用改良的Clavien-Dindo系统对术后并发症进行分类。采用纳入术前风险评分(PRS)、手术压力评分(SSS)和综合风险评分(CRS)的E-PASS评分系统进行风险分层。术后出现并发症38例(17.4%)。重要的预测因素包括高龄、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分较高、糖尿病和冠状动脉疾病等合并症。术中因素,如手术时间延长、入路次数和出血量增加,也与并发症有关。多因素分析发现,较高的CRS和较大的结石负担是独立预测因子(p = 0.012和p = 0.037)。CRS具有中等判别性,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.747。E-PASS评分系统可有效预测PCNL术后并发症,强调术前及术中全面评估的重要性。未来的研究应探索其在其他泌尿外科手术中的广泛适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urolithiasis
Urolithiasis UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field. Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.
期刊最新文献
Impact of double stent type on anxiety levels in patients undergoing ureteroscopy with double-J stent placement. Renal pelvis pressure and flowrate with a multi-channel ureteroscope: invoking the concept of outflow resistance. Constructive feedback on the use of FV-UAS with RIRS for treating 2-3 cm upper urinary tract stones. Evaluating postoperative complications in standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones larger than 2 cm: a retrospective study utilizing the E-PASS scoring system. Enhancing lithotripsy efficiency in retrograde intrarenal surgery via a flexible kidney-fixed position: findings from a prospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1