Karen Racicot Ph.D. , Denny Sakkas Ph.D. , Brent C. Barrett Ph.D. , Kenneth Chiang Ph.D. , Charles Jenkins B.S.
{"title":"Validation of a mail-in delayed semen analysis protocol developed for home collection","authors":"Karen Racicot Ph.D. , Denny Sakkas Ph.D. , Brent C. Barrett Ph.D. , Kenneth Chiang Ph.D. , Charles Jenkins B.S.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfre.2024.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To validate a mail-in delayed semen analysis service using deidentified remnant samples from a US fertility clinic.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Double-blinded prospective validation of screening/diagnostic test.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Fertility clinic and clinical reference laboratory.</div></div><div><h3>Patient(s)</h3><div>Deidentified remnant samples from patients attending fertility clinic for fertility assessment (study A, n = 68; study B, n = 232).</div></div><div><h3>Intervention(s)</h3><div>None.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measure(s)</h3><div>Total motility, concentration, and morphology (Kruger, strict) measures were compared between split semen specimens that underwent comprehensive semen analysis at <1 hour (referent) and 26 hours (experimental). The concordance between the paired measures was described using coefficient of variance and percent bias. Clinical concordance (CC) between 1- and 26-hour results for total motility, concentration, and morphology measures was also reported, using the fifth centile clinical reference ranges described in the World Health Organization manual (fifth edition).</div></div><div><h3>Result(s)</h3><div>In a controlled laboratory setting (study A), total motility, concentration, and morphology measures were highly consistent between the 1- and 26-hour analyses, with mean coefficients of variation (%CVs) of 9.0% for total motility, 4.0% for concentration, and 3.0% for morphology. There were also high CC rates: 94.2% for total motility; 100% for concentration; and 98.5% for morphology. In a real-world setting (study B), which included commercial shipment of specimens, the mean %CVs for total motility and concentration were 15% and 27%, respectively, which were more variable than those in study A yet still considerably less variable than that measured between laboratories using College of Anatomical Pathologist proficiency testing during the study period (motility %CV, 31%; concentration %CV, 37%). These comparisons also had high CC rates for total motility (86%) and concentration (93.1%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion(s)</h3><div>These results demonstrate the validation of a laboratory service that provides accurate, comprehensive semen analysis on specimens collected remotely and shipped overnight to a clinical diagnostic laboratory.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34409,"journal":{"name":"FS Reports","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 378-384"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705597/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FS Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334124001181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To validate a mail-in delayed semen analysis service using deidentified remnant samples from a US fertility clinic.
Design
Double-blinded prospective validation of screening/diagnostic test.
Setting
Fertility clinic and clinical reference laboratory.
Patient(s)
Deidentified remnant samples from patients attending fertility clinic for fertility assessment (study A, n = 68; study B, n = 232).
Intervention(s)
None.
Main Outcome Measure(s)
Total motility, concentration, and morphology (Kruger, strict) measures were compared between split semen specimens that underwent comprehensive semen analysis at <1 hour (referent) and 26 hours (experimental). The concordance between the paired measures was described using coefficient of variance and percent bias. Clinical concordance (CC) between 1- and 26-hour results for total motility, concentration, and morphology measures was also reported, using the fifth centile clinical reference ranges described in the World Health Organization manual (fifth edition).
Result(s)
In a controlled laboratory setting (study A), total motility, concentration, and morphology measures were highly consistent between the 1- and 26-hour analyses, with mean coefficients of variation (%CVs) of 9.0% for total motility, 4.0% for concentration, and 3.0% for morphology. There were also high CC rates: 94.2% for total motility; 100% for concentration; and 98.5% for morphology. In a real-world setting (study B), which included commercial shipment of specimens, the mean %CVs for total motility and concentration were 15% and 27%, respectively, which were more variable than those in study A yet still considerably less variable than that measured between laboratories using College of Anatomical Pathologist proficiency testing during the study period (motility %CV, 31%; concentration %CV, 37%). These comparisons also had high CC rates for total motility (86%) and concentration (93.1%).
Conclusion(s)
These results demonstrate the validation of a laboratory service that provides accurate, comprehensive semen analysis on specimens collected remotely and shipped overnight to a clinical diagnostic laboratory.