Disparities in infertility workup costs across the United States

Naveena R. Daram M.D. , Malika L. Day M.S. , Rose A. Maxwell Ph.D. , Meghan C. Ozcan M.D.
{"title":"Disparities in infertility workup costs across the United States","authors":"Naveena R. Daram M.D. ,&nbsp;Malika L. Day M.S. ,&nbsp;Rose A. Maxwell Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Meghan C. Ozcan M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfre.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate cost disparities of infertility diagnostic tests across the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Cross-sectional study analyzing costs for recommended infertility diagnostic tests, including hormone tests (follicle stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, estradiol, and progesterone), semen analysis, transvaginal ultrasound, and hysterosalpingogram. Data were sourced from consumer cost claims repositories for five most populous cities per state, categorized into four regions (Midwest, South, West, and Northeast) as per US Census Bureau classifications. Descriptive statistics and analysis of variance with Tukey’s post hoc tests evaluated cost variations across states and regions.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Patient(s)</h3><div>No individual subject data.</div></div><div><h3>Exposure</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measure(s)</h3><div>Average costs for infertility diagnostic tests by states/regions, correlated with median household income, race, poverty, uninsured rate, and insurance mandates.</div></div><div><h3>Result(s)</h3><div>Alaska had highest total cost at $2,986, with Oregon the lowest at $835. Costs for all tests, except follicle stimulating hormone, varied significantly across states. Regional variations were noted, with luteinizing hormone, estradiol, transvaginal ultrasound, and hysterosalpingogram showing significant differences. Total workup costs varied by region, with Midwest having the highest average at $1,651, positively correlated with median household income, followed by Northeast, West, and South. States with insurance mandates for fertility coverage had lower uninsured rates. No correlation was found between state insurance mandates and costs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion(s)</h3><div>The study highlights significant regional cost disparities in infertility care, emphasizing complexities of access and affordability in the United States. Further research is needed to assess the out-of-pocket financial burden on patients and identify strategies to reduce these costs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34409,"journal":{"name":"FS Reports","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 422-429"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705584/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FS Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334124001132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate cost disparities of infertility diagnostic tests across the United States.

Design

Cross-sectional study analyzing costs for recommended infertility diagnostic tests, including hormone tests (follicle stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, estradiol, and progesterone), semen analysis, transvaginal ultrasound, and hysterosalpingogram. Data were sourced from consumer cost claims repositories for five most populous cities per state, categorized into four regions (Midwest, South, West, and Northeast) as per US Census Bureau classifications. Descriptive statistics and analysis of variance with Tukey’s post hoc tests evaluated cost variations across states and regions.

Setting

Not applicable.

Patient(s)

No individual subject data.

Exposure

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Average costs for infertility diagnostic tests by states/regions, correlated with median household income, race, poverty, uninsured rate, and insurance mandates.

Result(s)

Alaska had highest total cost at $2,986, with Oregon the lowest at $835. Costs for all tests, except follicle stimulating hormone, varied significantly across states. Regional variations were noted, with luteinizing hormone, estradiol, transvaginal ultrasound, and hysterosalpingogram showing significant differences. Total workup costs varied by region, with Midwest having the highest average at $1,651, positively correlated with median household income, followed by Northeast, West, and South. States with insurance mandates for fertility coverage had lower uninsured rates. No correlation was found between state insurance mandates and costs.

Conclusion(s)

The study highlights significant regional cost disparities in infertility care, emphasizing complexities of access and affordability in the United States. Further research is needed to assess the out-of-pocket financial burden on patients and identify strategies to reduce these costs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国不孕症检查费用的差异。
目的:调查美国不孕症诊断检测的费用差异。设计:横断面研究分析推荐的不孕症诊断检查的成本,包括激素检查(促卵泡激素、黄体生成素、雌二醇和黄体酮)、精液分析、经阴道超声和子宫输卵管造影。数据来源于每个州人口最多的五个城市的消费者成本索赔库,根据美国人口普查局的分类,这些城市被分为四个地区(中西部、南部、西部和东北部)。描述性统计和方差分析与Tukey的事后测试评估了各州和地区之间的成本变化。设置:不适用。患者:无个体受试者数据。暴露:不适用。主要结果测量:各州/地区不孕症诊断测试的平均费用,与家庭收入中位数、种族、贫困、未参保率和保险任务相关。结果:阿拉斯加的总成本最高,为2986美元,俄勒冈最低,为835美元。除促卵泡激素外,所有测试的费用在各州之间差异很大。区域差异是值得注意的,黄体生成素、雌二醇、经阴道超声和子宫输卵管造影显示显著差异。总检查费用因地区而异,中西部地区的平均费用最高,为1,651美元,与家庭收入中位数呈正相关,其次是东北部,西部和南部。实行生育保险的州的未参保率较低。没有发现州保险授权和成本之间的相关性。结论:该研究突出了不孕不育护理的显著区域成本差异,强调了美国获得和负担能力的复杂性。需要进一步的研究来评估患者自付的经济负担,并确定减少这些费用的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
FS Reports
FS Reports Medicine-Embryology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
60 days
期刊最新文献
The role of elagolix in ovulation suppression during controlled ovarian stimulation: a retrospective cohort study In vitro gametogenesis in the ongoing quest to vanquish infertility: the role of epigenetics Is endometriosis typology a potentially better classification system for assessing risk of female infertility? No need to freeze everything: Are we striking the right balance in fertility treatments? Office of Public Affairs update: a quarterly update from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Office of Public Affairs on key developments in reproductive health policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1