{"title":"A GLOBAL VIEW OF HEPATOLOGY COLLABORATION: INSIGHTS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS FROM 30 YEARS OF NETWORK ANALYSIS (1994-2023).","authors":"Naruaki Ogasawara","doi":"10.1590/S0004-2803.24612024-103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to analyze the structural dynamics of research collaboration in hepatology over a 30-year period (1994-2023), focusing on co-authorship networks. By examining data from the Web of Science Core Collection, the study explores key metrics such as network density, clustering coefficient, and centrality measures, providing insights into how collaborative efforts have shaped the field of hepatology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Python (Version 3.10.5) in the PyCharm environment, I conducted a network analysis of 9,278 hepatology-related publications. Macro-level indicators, including network density, clustering coefficient, number of components, and average path length, were used to evaluate overall network structure. Micro-level metrics, such as degree centrality, closeness centrality, and betweenness centrality, were employed to assess the influence of individual researchers within the network.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis showed an increase in network fragmentation, with components rising from 338 in 1994-2003 to 1,302 by 2014-2023. Despite the growing number of publications, network density remained consistently low, indicating limited direct collaboration. However, high clustering coefficients across all periods suggest that collaborations form in tightly connected groups. This study identified key researchers such as LAMBERTINI A. (1994-2003), Manns, Michael P. (2004-2013), and Berg, Thomas (2014-2023), who played central roles, linking different research clusters and facilitating collaboration across groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hepatology research has experienced significant growth in publications over the past 30 years, yet collaborative efforts remain localized, with increasing network fragmentation. Identifying central researchers who bridge gaps between otherwise disconnected groups is essential to fostering broader collaboration. This analysis underscores the importance of strengthening international cooperation and collaborative research to address the increasingly complex and region-specific liver diseases worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":35671,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos de Gastroenterologia","volume":"61 ","pages":"e24103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos de Gastroenterologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-2803.24612024-103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study aims to analyze the structural dynamics of research collaboration in hepatology over a 30-year period (1994-2023), focusing on co-authorship networks. By examining data from the Web of Science Core Collection, the study explores key metrics such as network density, clustering coefficient, and centrality measures, providing insights into how collaborative efforts have shaped the field of hepatology.
Methods: Using Python (Version 3.10.5) in the PyCharm environment, I conducted a network analysis of 9,278 hepatology-related publications. Macro-level indicators, including network density, clustering coefficient, number of components, and average path length, were used to evaluate overall network structure. Micro-level metrics, such as degree centrality, closeness centrality, and betweenness centrality, were employed to assess the influence of individual researchers within the network.
Results: The analysis showed an increase in network fragmentation, with components rising from 338 in 1994-2003 to 1,302 by 2014-2023. Despite the growing number of publications, network density remained consistently low, indicating limited direct collaboration. However, high clustering coefficients across all periods suggest that collaborations form in tightly connected groups. This study identified key researchers such as LAMBERTINI A. (1994-2003), Manns, Michael P. (2004-2013), and Berg, Thomas (2014-2023), who played central roles, linking different research clusters and facilitating collaboration across groups.
Conclusion: Hepatology research has experienced significant growth in publications over the past 30 years, yet collaborative efforts remain localized, with increasing network fragmentation. Identifying central researchers who bridge gaps between otherwise disconnected groups is essential to fostering broader collaboration. This analysis underscores the importance of strengthening international cooperation and collaborative research to address the increasingly complex and region-specific liver diseases worldwide.
背景:本研究旨在分析30年间(1994-2023年)肝病学研究合作的结构动态,重点关注合著者网络。通过检查Web of Science核心收集的数据,该研究探索了关键指标,如网络密度、聚类系数和中心性度量,为合作努力如何塑造肝病学领域提供了见解。方法:在PyCharm环境中使用Python (Version 3.10.5),对9278篇肝病学相关出版物进行了网络分析。宏观层面的指标,包括网络密度、聚类系数、组件数、平均路径长度等,用来评价整体网络结构。微观层面的指标,如度中心性、接近中心性和中间中心性,被用来评估个别研究人员在网络中的影响。结果:分析显示网络碎片化程度增加,组件从1994-2003年的338个增加到2014-2023年的1302个。尽管出版物数量不断增加,但网络密度一直很低,表明直接合作有限。然而,所有时期的高聚类系数表明协作是在紧密联系的群体中形成的。本研究确定了LAMBERTINI A.(1994-2003)、Manns, Michael P.(2004-2013)和Berg, Thomas(2014-2023)等关键研究人员,他们在连接不同的研究集群和促进跨小组合作方面发挥了核心作用。结论:在过去的30年里,肝病学研究在出版物上经历了显著的增长,但合作努力仍然局限于局部,网络碎片化程度越来越高。确定能够在互不联系的小组之间架起桥梁的核心研究人员,对于促进更广泛的合作至关重要。这一分析强调了加强国际合作和合作研究的重要性,以解决世界范围内日益复杂和区域特异性的肝脏疾病。
期刊介绍:
The journal Arquivos de Gastroenterologia (Archives of Gastroenterology), a quarterly journal, is the Official Publication of the Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia IBEPEGE (Brazilian Institute for Studies and Research in Gastroenterology), Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva - CBCD (Brazilian College of Digestive Surgery) and of the Sociedade Brasileira de Motilidade Digestiva - SBMD (Brazilian Digestive Motility Society). It is dedicated to the publishing of scientific papers by national and foreign researchers who are in agreement with the aim of the journal as well as with its editorial policies.