Anterior Knee Pain and Knee Functional Scores Following Common Approaches to Tibial Shaft Fractures: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS JBJS Open Access Pub Date : 2025-01-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00119
Sarthak Parikh, Laurel Marsh, Mateao Anderson, Jeremy Scott, Amar Patel, Christopher Hendrix, Keivan Abtahi
{"title":"Anterior Knee Pain and Knee Functional Scores Following Common Approaches to Tibial Shaft Fractures: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Sarthak Parikh, Laurel Marsh, Mateao Anderson, Jeremy Scott, Amar Patel, Christopher Hendrix, Keivan Abtahi","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tibial shaft fractures are common, causing substantial morbidity. Intramedullary nailing offers advantages but often leads to anterior knee pain and functional issues.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a systematic review on outcomes for different surgical approaches-suprapatellar (SP), infrapatellar (IP), medial parapatellar (MPP), and lateral parapatellar (LPP). Searches across Ovid, Embase, and PubMed identified studies from 2000 to 2023, including retrospective and prospective studies, randomized controlled trials, and case series on anterior knee pain and functional outcomes postsurgery. Bias was assessed using Cochrane's RoB2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 27 studies, 8 were noncomparative (3 SP, 3 IP, 1 MPP, 1 LPP), showing varied anterior knee pain and function outcomes. Comparative studies (12 SP vs. IP, 5 MPP vs. IP) indicated better patient-reported outcomes for SP over IP in anterior knee pain and knee function. Comparative data for MPP and LPP remain limited. Overall RoB was low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SP has better patient-reported outcomes and lower anterior knee pain than IP. MPP and LPP approaches are promising but lack robust comparative data. Further large, prospective trials are needed to clarify optimal approaches for tibial shaft fractures.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11692956/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tibial shaft fractures are common, causing substantial morbidity. Intramedullary nailing offers advantages but often leads to anterior knee pain and functional issues.

Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a systematic review on outcomes for different surgical approaches-suprapatellar (SP), infrapatellar (IP), medial parapatellar (MPP), and lateral parapatellar (LPP). Searches across Ovid, Embase, and PubMed identified studies from 2000 to 2023, including retrospective and prospective studies, randomized controlled trials, and case series on anterior knee pain and functional outcomes postsurgery. Bias was assessed using Cochrane's RoB2.

Results: Of 27 studies, 8 were noncomparative (3 SP, 3 IP, 1 MPP, 1 LPP), showing varied anterior knee pain and function outcomes. Comparative studies (12 SP vs. IP, 5 MPP vs. IP) indicated better patient-reported outcomes for SP over IP in anterior knee pain and knee function. Comparative data for MPP and LPP remain limited. Overall RoB was low.

Conclusion: SP has better patient-reported outcomes and lower anterior knee pain than IP. MPP and LPP approaches are promising but lack robust comparative data. Further large, prospective trials are needed to clarify optimal approaches for tibial shaft fractures.

Level of evidence: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胫骨干骨折常用入路后的膝关节前侧疼痛和膝关节功能评分:一项系统综述。
背景:胫骨干骨折很常见,发病率很高。髓内钉提供了优势,但往往会导致膝关节前侧疼痛和功能问题。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目,我们对不同手术入路——髌上(SP)、髌下(IP)、髌旁内侧(MPP)和髌旁外侧(LPP)的结果进行了系统回顾。通过Ovid、Embase和PubMed检索,确定了2000年至2023年的研究,包括回顾性和前瞻性研究、随机对照试验和前膝关节疼痛和术后功能结局的病例系列。采用Cochrane’s RoB2评价偏倚。结果:27项研究中,8项是非比较研究(3项SP, 3项IP, 1项MPP, 1项LPP),显示不同的膝关节前疼痛和功能结果。比较研究(12项SP与IP, 5项MPP与IP)表明,SP优于IP治疗膝关节前疼痛和膝关节功能。MPP和LPP的比较数据仍然有限。总的来说,RoB很低。结论:SP比IP有更好的患者报告的预后和膝关节前下部疼痛。MPP和LPP方法很有前景,但缺乏可靠的比较数据。需要进一步的大型前瞻性试验来明确胫骨干骨折的最佳入路。证据等级:三级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JBJS Open Access
JBJS Open Access Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Updated Demographic Profile of Orthopaedic Surgery Using a New ABOS Data Set. ASA Class Is a Stronger Predictor of Early Revision Risk Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty than BMI. Erratum: Expanding the Pipeline: Exposure and Female Mentorship Increase Interest in Orthopaedic Surgery Among Female Premedical Undergraduate Students: Erratum. Fetal Cartilage Progenitor Cells in the Repair of Osteochondral Defects. Source Characteristics Influence AI-Enabled Orthopaedic Text Simplification: Recommendations for the Future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1