Stress shielding in reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a proximally coated stem for proximal humeral fractures: Does it have clinical relevance?

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Shoulder and Elbow Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1177/17585732241309899
Francesc Goñalons-Giol, Cristina Ventura-Parellada, Javier Alonso-Rodríguez-Piedra, Xavier Llorens-Martínez, Ferran Gàmez-Baños, José-María Mora-Guix
{"title":"Stress shielding in reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a proximally coated stem for proximal humeral fractures: Does it have clinical relevance?","authors":"Francesc Goñalons-Giol, Cristina Ventura-Parellada, Javier Alonso-Rodríguez-Piedra, Xavier Llorens-Martínez, Ferran Gàmez-Baños, José-María Mora-Guix","doi":"10.1177/17585732241309899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the clinical significance of stress shielding in patients who have undergone an uncemented reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with a proximally coated stem for complex proximal humeral fractures (PHF) comprising 3 or 4 parts, assessed at 2 years postoperatively. Additionally, this study aims to examine the correlation between tuberosity healing and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><b>Setting:</b> Single Centre.<b>Patient Selection Criteria:</b> 43 patients underwent surgery involving a cementless RSA with an anatomical stem (Mini Stem of Zimmer Biomet <sup>®</sup> Comprehensive System) following an acute 3- or 4-part or 4-part with luxation PHF within 4 weeks of injury. Patients who were excluded from the study included those who passed away, did not have a minimum 2-year follow-up, or had undergone cemented RSAs or alternative humeral components, as well as those who required RSA due to fracture sequelae.<b>Outcome Measures and Comparisons:</b> Stress shielding, tuberosity healing and its positioning were evaluated. Clinical-functional assessments were made using the Constant and ASES scores. Furthermore, quality of life assessments, including QuickDASH score, SF-12, satisfaction test (SANE) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total shoulders, 6 (13.9%) were excluded, leaving 37 PHFs that met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at the time of surgery was 72 years (range, 61-85). Stress shielding was observed in 31 shoulders (83.8%). There was no observed correlation between stress shielding and clinical-functional or quality of life assessments. The greater tuberosity in patients without stress shielding was found to be above the tray (66.7%) (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Tuberosity healing was observed in 94.6% (35/37) of the shoulders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No significant clinical difference was observed between patients with and without stress shielding in terms of short-term functional outcomes. Successful consolidation of the tuberosities can be attained even in cases with notable stress shielding.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV; Case Series; Treatment study.</p>","PeriodicalId":36705,"journal":{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow","volume":" ","pages":"17585732241309899"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705294/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732241309899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the clinical significance of stress shielding in patients who have undergone an uncemented reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with a proximally coated stem for complex proximal humeral fractures (PHF) comprising 3 or 4 parts, assessed at 2 years postoperatively. Additionally, this study aims to examine the correlation between tuberosity healing and clinical outcomes.

Methods: Setting: Single Centre.Patient Selection Criteria: 43 patients underwent surgery involving a cementless RSA with an anatomical stem (Mini Stem of Zimmer Biomet ® Comprehensive System) following an acute 3- or 4-part or 4-part with luxation PHF within 4 weeks of injury. Patients who were excluded from the study included those who passed away, did not have a minimum 2-year follow-up, or had undergone cemented RSAs or alternative humeral components, as well as those who required RSA due to fracture sequelae.Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Stress shielding, tuberosity healing and its positioning were evaluated. Clinical-functional assessments were made using the Constant and ASES scores. Furthermore, quality of life assessments, including QuickDASH score, SF-12, satisfaction test (SANE) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were performed.

Results: Of the total shoulders, 6 (13.9%) were excluded, leaving 37 PHFs that met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at the time of surgery was 72 years (range, 61-85). Stress shielding was observed in 31 shoulders (83.8%). There was no observed correlation between stress shielding and clinical-functional or quality of life assessments. The greater tuberosity in patients without stress shielding was found to be above the tray (66.7%) (P < 0.05). Tuberosity healing was observed in 94.6% (35/37) of the shoulders.

Conclusions: No significant clinical difference was observed between patients with and without stress shielding in terms of short-term functional outcomes. Successful consolidation of the tuberosities can be attained even in cases with notable stress shielding.

Level of evidence: Level IV; Case Series; Treatment study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应力屏蔽在肱骨近端骨折用近端包覆柄反向肩关节置换术中的应用:是否具有临床意义?
目的:评估应力保护在接受非骨水泥反向肩关节置换术(RSA)的患者中的临床意义,近端包覆柄治疗复杂肱骨近端骨折(PHF),包括3或4个部分,在术后2年评估。此外,本研究旨在探讨结节愈合与临床结果之间的关系。方法:设置:单中心。患者选择标准:43例患者在受伤后4周内接受急性3、4部分或4部分脱位PHF手术,包括无骨水泥RSA和解剖干(Zimmer Biomet®综合系统的Mini stem)。被排除在研究之外的患者包括那些去世的、没有至少2年随访的、或接受过骨水泥RSA或肱骨替代假体的患者,以及那些因骨折后遗症而需要RSA的患者。结果测量和比较:评估应力屏蔽、结节愈合及其定位。使用Constant和ASES评分进行临床功能评估。并进行生活质量评估,包括QuickDASH评分、SF-12、满意度测试(SANE)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)。结果:6例(13.9%)肩胛骨被排除,37例phf符合纳入标准。手术时的平均年龄为72岁(范围61-85岁)。应力屏蔽31例(83.8%)。没有观察到应激屏蔽与临床功能或生活质量评估之间的相关性。无应激屏蔽患者的大结节位于托盘上方(66.7%)(P)。结论:在短期功能结局方面,有无应激屏蔽患者无显著临床差异。即使在有明显应力屏蔽的情况下,也可以成功地巩固结节。证据等级:四级;系列;治疗研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Shoulder and Elbow
Shoulder and Elbow Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊最新文献
Epidemiology of acromioclavicular joint separations presenting to emergency departments in the United States between 2004 and 2023. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with bioinductive patch achieves equivalent patient-reported outcomes and retear rate at 1 year. Patterns of management for post-traumatic elbow stiffness: A comparative study of open and arthroscopic approaches. Stress shielding influences shoulder function after reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a short stem at minimum 2 years follow-up and can be predicted using a preoperative planning software: A retrospective cohort study. Response to the Letter-to-the-Editor by Dr H Duansuperwong and Prof. V Wiwanitkit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1