Long-term risk of adverse limb outcomes in older patients after endovascular femoral artery revascularization: The Boston femoral artery endovascular revascularization outcomes (Boston FAROUT) study.

IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-29 DOI:10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.017
Jay Khambhati, Piotr Sobieszczyk, Andrew C Eisenhauer, Thomas M Todoran, Scott Kinlay
{"title":"Long-term risk of adverse limb outcomes in older patients after endovascular femoral artery revascularization: The Boston femoral artery endovascular revascularization outcomes (Boston FAROUT) study.","authors":"Jay Khambhati, Piotr Sobieszczyk, Andrew C Eisenhauer, Thomas M Todoran, Scott Kinlay","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Older patients may be denied endovascular revascularization of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) for peripheral artery disease (PAD) due to concerns of worse limb outcomes than younger patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed adverse outcomes in patients after an index revascularization stratified by age (age < 65, 65-75 years, and > 75 years) from two centers between 2003 and 2011 and followed a median 9 (25 %-75 %: 7, 11) years. Outcomes included major adverse limb events (MALE) or minor repeat revascularization, death, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). We used cause-specific and competing-risks analyses with clustering by patient to determine the hazard ratios (HR), sub-hazard ratios (SHR), 95 % confidence intervals (95%CI) for outcomes according to older age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 253 limbs revascularized in 202 patients with a high use of lipid lowering therapy (91 %) and aspirin anti-platelet therapy (96 %). In oldest age group (>75 years), 71 limbs were revascularized and patients were less likely to be active smokers and had poorer tibial runoff than younger patients. In competing risks multivariable models, patients >75 years old had similar risks over 10 years of MALE or minor revascularization (SHR = 0.92, 95%CI = 0.53, 1.62) and MACCE (SHR = 1.12, 95%CI = 0.58, 2.18) to younger patients. All-cause death was more common in older patients (HR = 1.99, 95%CI = 1.25, 3.17).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After adjusting for the competing risk of death, patients >75 years had similar incidence of adverse limb outcomes and MACCE to younger patients after endovascular revascularization of the femoral artery. Consequently, older patients should be considered for endovascular revascularization when indicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Older patients may be denied endovascular revascularization of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) for peripheral artery disease (PAD) due to concerns of worse limb outcomes than younger patients.

Methods: We assessed adverse outcomes in patients after an index revascularization stratified by age (age < 65, 65-75 years, and > 75 years) from two centers between 2003 and 2011 and followed a median 9 (25 %-75 %: 7, 11) years. Outcomes included major adverse limb events (MALE) or minor repeat revascularization, death, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). We used cause-specific and competing-risks analyses with clustering by patient to determine the hazard ratios (HR), sub-hazard ratios (SHR), 95 % confidence intervals (95%CI) for outcomes according to older age.

Results: There were 253 limbs revascularized in 202 patients with a high use of lipid lowering therapy (91 %) and aspirin anti-platelet therapy (96 %). In oldest age group (>75 years), 71 limbs were revascularized and patients were less likely to be active smokers and had poorer tibial runoff than younger patients. In competing risks multivariable models, patients >75 years old had similar risks over 10 years of MALE or minor revascularization (SHR = 0.92, 95%CI = 0.53, 1.62) and MACCE (SHR = 1.12, 95%CI = 0.58, 2.18) to younger patients. All-cause death was more common in older patients (HR = 1.99, 95%CI = 1.25, 3.17).

Conclusions: After adjusting for the competing risk of death, patients >75 years had similar incidence of adverse limb outcomes and MACCE to younger patients after endovascular revascularization of the femoral artery. Consequently, older patients should be considered for endovascular revascularization when indicated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年患者行股动脉血管内重建术后肢体不良结局的长期风险:波士顿股动脉血管内重建术结局(Boston FAROUT)研究
老年外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者可能会被拒绝行股浅动脉(SFA)血管内重建术,因为担心其肢体预后比年轻患者更差。方法:我们评估了2003年至2011年间两个中心按年龄(75岁)分层进行指数血运重建术的患者的不良后果,随访时间中位数为9年(25% - 75%:7,11)年。结果包括严重肢体不良事件(MALE)或轻微重复血运重建术、死亡和严重心脑血管不良事件(MACCE)。我们采用病因特异性和竞争风险分析,并按患者进行聚类,以确定不同年龄结局的风险比(HR)、亚风险比(SHR)和95%置信区间(95%CI)。结果:202例患者中有253条肢体血运重建,其中高剂量降脂治疗(91%)和阿司匹林抗血小板治疗(96%)。在年龄最大的年龄组(50 ~ 75岁)中,71条肢体进行了血运重建,患者不太可能是活跃的吸烟者,胫骨径流较年轻患者差。在竞争风险多变量模型中,bb0 - 75岁的患者与年轻患者相比,10年内男性或轻度血运重建(SHR = 0.92, 95%CI = 0.53, 1.62)和MACCE (SHR = 1.12, 95%CI = 0.58, 2.18)的风险相似。全因死亡在老年患者中更为常见(HR = 1.99, 95%CI = 1.25, 3.17)。结论:在调整了竞争死亡风险后,年龄在0 - 75岁之间的患者在股动脉血管内重建术后的不良肢体结局和MACCE发生率与年轻患者相似。因此,老年患者应考虑在指征时进行血管内血管重建术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
687
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine (CRM) is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to revascularization therapies in cardiovascular medicine. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine publishes articles related to preclinical work and molecular interventions, including angiogenesis, cell therapy, pharmacological interventions, restenosis management, and prevention, including experiments conducted in human subjects, in laboratory animals, and in vitro. Specific areas of interest include percutaneous angioplasty in coronary and peripheral arteries, intervention in structural heart disease, cardiovascular surgery, etc.
期刊最新文献
Safety and efficacy of the unilateral, suture-based, dry-closure technique in percutaneous trans-axillary aortic valve implantation. Outcomes of aortic stenosis in patients with cardiac amyloidosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The role of Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index to assess the outcomes following catheter directed therapy in patients with intermediate-to-high and high-risk pulmonary embolism. Sex-related differences in hospital outcomes after balloon aortic valvuloplasty. Clinical safety and performance of the third-generation Fantom Encore sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold: Insights from a single-center study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1