Exploring the stigma against people with mental illness in Bangladesh.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Global Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-11-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1017/gmh.2024.107
Prodyut Roy, Kamal Uddin Ahmed Chowdhury
{"title":"Exploring the stigma against people with mental illness in Bangladesh.","authors":"Prodyut Roy, Kamal Uddin Ahmed Chowdhury","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2024.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates the stigma against people with mental illness in Bangladesh through in-depth interviews with 14 patients and 9 healthcare professionals, and 33 focus group discussions with people without mental illness. The research has delved into the understanding of different types of stigma against mental illness in the context of Bangladesh. The findings revealed four types of stigma which were categorized into four themes namely self-stigma, public stigma, professional, and institutional stigma. Patients had internalized negative attitudes, thereby discriminated toward themselves. The public discriminated against patients because of believing in prejudices against them. Other health professionals had negative conceptions toward patients, and they devalued mental health professionals (MHPs). A culture of negative attitude and belief had emerged in institutional settings which encouraged discrimination. Policymakers and healthcare professionals can use the findings to develop a mental health service by addressing the stigma. Mental health practitioners can assess the impact of stigma to improve the mental well-being of their patients. Students and workplace staff will benefit from intentional or unintentional discrimination in educational institutions and workplace settings by addressing the effects of stigma. Importantly, other health care providers will be aware of their thoughts against patients and MHPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48579,"journal":{"name":"Global Mental Health","volume":"11 ","pages":"e108"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2024.107","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the stigma against people with mental illness in Bangladesh through in-depth interviews with 14 patients and 9 healthcare professionals, and 33 focus group discussions with people without mental illness. The research has delved into the understanding of different types of stigma against mental illness in the context of Bangladesh. The findings revealed four types of stigma which were categorized into four themes namely self-stigma, public stigma, professional, and institutional stigma. Patients had internalized negative attitudes, thereby discriminated toward themselves. The public discriminated against patients because of believing in prejudices against them. Other health professionals had negative conceptions toward patients, and they devalued mental health professionals (MHPs). A culture of negative attitude and belief had emerged in institutional settings which encouraged discrimination. Policymakers and healthcare professionals can use the findings to develop a mental health service by addressing the stigma. Mental health practitioners can assess the impact of stigma to improve the mental well-being of their patients. Students and workplace staff will benefit from intentional or unintentional discrimination in educational institutions and workplace settings by addressing the effects of stigma. Importantly, other health care providers will be aware of their thoughts against patients and MHPs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索孟加拉国对精神疾病患者的污名。
本研究通过对14名患者和9名医疗保健专业人员的深入访谈,以及33次与无精神疾病患者的焦点小组讨论,调查了孟加拉国对精神疾病患者的污名化。这项研究深入研究了在孟加拉国背景下对不同类型的精神疾病耻辱的理解。研究结果揭示了四种类型的耻辱感,分为四个主题,即自我耻辱感、公共耻辱感、专业耻辱感和机构耻辱感。患者内化了消极态度,从而歧视自己。公众歧视病人是因为相信对他们的偏见。其他卫生专业人员对患者有负面观念,他们贬低心理卫生专业人员(MHPs)。在鼓励歧视的体制环境中出现了一种消极态度和信念的文化。政策制定者和卫生保健专业人员可以利用这些发现,通过解决耻辱感来发展精神卫生服务。心理健康从业者可以评估耻辱感的影响,以改善患者的心理健康。通过解决污名化的影响,学生和工作场所工作人员将从教育机构和工作场所环境中有意或无意的歧视中受益。重要的是,其他医疗保健提供者将意识到他们对患者和MHPs的想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Mental Health
Global Mental Health PSYCHIATRY-
自引率
5.10%
发文量
58
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: lobal Mental Health (GMH) is an Open Access journal that publishes papers that have a broad application of ‘the global point of view’ of mental health issues. The field of ‘global mental health’ is still emerging, reflecting a movement of advocacy and associated research driven by an agenda to remedy longstanding treatment gaps and disparities in care, access, and capacity. But these efforts and goals are also driving a potential reframing of knowledge in powerful ways, and positioning a new disciplinary approach to mental health. GMH seeks to cultivate and grow this emerging distinct discipline of ‘global mental health’, and the new knowledge and paradigms that should come from it.
期刊最新文献
A response to criticism of the global mental health movement. How polarization can be overcome in theory and in west African social psychiatric practice. The impact of task-sharing scalable mental health interventions on non-specialist providers: a scoping review. Living with psychosis in West and Southeast Africa: SUCCEED Africa's four-country situation analysis. Early intervention in psychosis programs in Africa, Asia and Latin America; challenges and recommendations. Differences in severity of depression symptoms in overweight, obese and normal weight Palestinian children and adolescents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1