Disability-Related Disparities in Screening for Intimate Partner Violence During the Perinatal Period: A Population-Based Study

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Womens Health Issues Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2024.12.001
Kathryn Laughon PhD, RN, FAAN , Rosemary B. Hughes PhD , Genevieve Lyons MSPH , Kana Roarty BSN, RN , Jeanne Alhusen PhD, CRNP, RN, FAAN
{"title":"Disability-Related Disparities in Screening for Intimate Partner Violence During the Perinatal Period: A Population-Based Study","authors":"Kathryn Laughon PhD, RN, FAAN ,&nbsp;Rosemary B. Hughes PhD ,&nbsp;Genevieve Lyons MSPH ,&nbsp;Kana Roarty BSN, RN ,&nbsp;Jeanne Alhusen PhD, CRNP, RN, FAAN","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Persons with disabilities are at higher risk of experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV) during the perinatal period than persons without disabilities. Although screening for IPV during the perinatal period is recommended by many organizations, little is known about screening rates for IPV by disability status.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Our objective was to compare rates of IPV screening during the perinatal period among persons with and without disabilities in the United States. A cross-sectional sample of 43,837 respondents provided data on disability, including difficulty in vision, hearing, ambulation, cognition, communication, and self-care. We conducted a secondary analysis of nationally representative data from the 2018–2020 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During pregnancy, respondents with disabilities had a lower odds of IPV screening as compared with respondents without disabilities (adjusted odds ratio .83, 95% confidence interval [.70, .99]). Despite similar screening rates in the 12 months before conception and postpartum among respondents with and without disabilities who attended health care visits, those with disabilities were less likely to receive pregnancy-related care during pregnancy (<em>p</em> &lt; .0001) and in the postpartum period (<em>p</em> &lt; .0001) and thus missed opportunities to be screened.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our findings demonstrate a need for health care providers to collaborate with policy makers, disability advocates, and researchers to reduce the disparities people with disabilities face in accessing health care, including screening for IPV during the perinatal period. Such efforts are essential for maximizing the health and safety of pregnant persons and new parents with disabilities and their children during the perinatal period.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":"35 2","pages":"Pages 97-104"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Health Issues","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386724001257","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Persons with disabilities are at higher risk of experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV) during the perinatal period than persons without disabilities. Although screening for IPV during the perinatal period is recommended by many organizations, little is known about screening rates for IPV by disability status.

Methods

Our objective was to compare rates of IPV screening during the perinatal period among persons with and without disabilities in the United States. A cross-sectional sample of 43,837 respondents provided data on disability, including difficulty in vision, hearing, ambulation, cognition, communication, and self-care. We conducted a secondary analysis of nationally representative data from the 2018–2020 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.

Results

During pregnancy, respondents with disabilities had a lower odds of IPV screening as compared with respondents without disabilities (adjusted odds ratio .83, 95% confidence interval [.70, .99]). Despite similar screening rates in the 12 months before conception and postpartum among respondents with and without disabilities who attended health care visits, those with disabilities were less likely to receive pregnancy-related care during pregnancy (p < .0001) and in the postpartum period (p < .0001) and thus missed opportunities to be screened.

Conclusion

Our findings demonstrate a need for health care providers to collaborate with policy makers, disability advocates, and researchers to reduce the disparities people with disabilities face in accessing health care, including screening for IPV during the perinatal period. Such efforts are essential for maximizing the health and safety of pregnant persons and new parents with disabilities and their children during the perinatal period.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围产期亲密伴侣暴力筛查中的残疾相关差异:一项基于人群的研究。
背景:与非残疾人相比,残疾人在围产期遭受亲密伴侣暴力的风险更高。虽然许多组织建议在围产期进行IPV筛查,但对残疾状况的IPV筛查率知之甚少。方法:我们的目的是比较美国残疾人和非残疾人围产期IPV筛查率。43,837名受访者的横断面样本提供了有关残疾的数据,包括视力、听力、行走、认知、沟通和自我保健方面的困难。我们对2018-2020年妊娠风险评估监测系统中具有全国代表性的数据进行了二次分析。结果:在怀孕期间,残疾的调查对象接受IPV筛查的几率低于没有残疾的调查对象(调整优势比为0.83,95%可信区间[。70年,获得])。尽管在怀孕前12个月和产后参加医疗保健访问的残疾和非残疾受访者中,筛查率相似,但残疾人士在怀孕期间接受与妊娠有关的护理的可能性较小(p结论:我们的研究结果表明,卫生保健提供者需要与政策制定者、残疾人倡导者和研究人员合作,以减少残疾人在获得卫生保健方面面临的差距,包括围产期IPV筛查。这些努力对于最大限度地保障孕妇和残疾新生儿及其子女在围产期的健康和安全至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Health Issues (WHI) is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly, multidisciplinary journal that publishes research and review manuscripts related to women"s health care and policy. As the official journal of the Jacobs Institute of Women"s Health, it is dedicated to improving the health and health care of all women throughout the lifespan and in diverse communities. The journal seeks to inform health services researchers, health care and public health professionals, social scientists, policymakers, and others concerned with women"s health.
期刊最新文献
Flourishing Women, Flourishing Institutions: Academic Medical Center Leaders' Perspectives on Recruitment and Retention of Women in Leadership. Predictors of Intention to Use At-Home HPV Testing: Health Belief Factors and Potential Moderation by Decision-Making Style. Can Social Work Interventions Improve Perinatal Mental Health Outcomes? A Systematic Review. eHealth Literacy, Physical Activity Engagement, and Depressive Symptoms in Women With Blindness and Low Vision. Effects of High-Intensity Focused Electromagnetic Therapy (HIFEM) With Pelvic Floor Muscle Training in Mothers Living With Incontinence: A Pilot for a Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1