The structure of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support: a meta-analytic confirmatory factor analysis.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Global Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-12-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1017/gmh.2024.118
Hakan Koğar, Esin Yılmaz Koğar
{"title":"The structure of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support: a meta-analytic confirmatory factor analysis.","authors":"Hakan Koğar, Esin Yılmaz Koğar","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2024.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One of the most popular instruments used to assess perceived social support is the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). Although the original structure of the MSPSS was defined to include three specific factors (significant others, friends and family), studies in the literature propose different factor solutions. In this study, we addressed the controversial factor structure of the MSPSS using a meta-analytic confirmatory factor analysis approach. For this purpose, we utilized studies in the literature that examined and reported the internal structure of the MSPSS. However, we used summary data from 59 samples of 54 studies (total <i>N</i> = 27,905) after excluding studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria. We tested five different models discussed in the literature and found that the fit indices of the correlated 3-factor model and the bifactor model were quite good. Therefore, we also examined both models' factor loadings and omega coefficients. Since there was no sharp difference between the two models and the theoretical structure of the scale was represented by the correlated three factors, we decided that the correlated three-factor model was more appropriate for the internal structure of the MSPSS. We then examined the measurement invariance for this model according to language and sample type (clinical and nonclinical) and found that metric invariance was achieved. As a result, we found that the three-factor structure of the MSPSS was supported in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":48579,"journal":{"name":"Global Mental Health","volume":"11 ","pages":"e126"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704376/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2024.118","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the most popular instruments used to assess perceived social support is the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). Although the original structure of the MSPSS was defined to include three specific factors (significant others, friends and family), studies in the literature propose different factor solutions. In this study, we addressed the controversial factor structure of the MSPSS using a meta-analytic confirmatory factor analysis approach. For this purpose, we utilized studies in the literature that examined and reported the internal structure of the MSPSS. However, we used summary data from 59 samples of 54 studies (total N = 27,905) after excluding studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria. We tested five different models discussed in the literature and found that the fit indices of the correlated 3-factor model and the bifactor model were quite good. Therefore, we also examined both models' factor loadings and omega coefficients. Since there was no sharp difference between the two models and the theoretical structure of the scale was represented by the correlated three factors, we decided that the correlated three-factor model was more appropriate for the internal structure of the MSPSS. We then examined the measurement invariance for this model according to language and sample type (clinical and nonclinical) and found that metric invariance was achieved. As a result, we found that the three-factor structure of the MSPSS was supported in this study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感知社会支持多维度量表的结构:一个元分析验证性因子分析。
一个最流行的工具用来评估感知社会支持是感知社会支持的多维尺度(MSPSS)。虽然MSPSS的原始结构被定义为包括三个特定因素(重要他人、朋友和家庭),但文献中的研究提出了不同的因素解决方案。在本研究中,我们使用元分析验证性因素分析方法解决了MSPSS中有争议的因素结构。为此,我们利用了文献中的研究,检查并报告了MSPSS的内部结构。然而,在排除了不符合纳入标准的研究后,我们使用了来自54项研究的59个样本(总N = 27,905)的汇总数据。我们对文献中讨论的五种不同的模型进行了检验,发现相关的三因素模型和双因素模型的拟合指标都很好。因此,我们还检查了两个模型的因子负荷和ω系数。由于两种模型之间没有明显的差异,而且量表的理论结构是由相关的三因素来表示的,因此我们认为相关的三因素模型更适合于MSPSS的内部结构。然后,我们根据语言和样本类型(临床和非临床)检查了该模型的测量不变性,并发现实现了度量不变性。因此,我们发现MSPSS的三因素结构在本研究中得到支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Mental Health
Global Mental Health PSYCHIATRY-
自引率
5.10%
发文量
58
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: lobal Mental Health (GMH) is an Open Access journal that publishes papers that have a broad application of ‘the global point of view’ of mental health issues. The field of ‘global mental health’ is still emerging, reflecting a movement of advocacy and associated research driven by an agenda to remedy longstanding treatment gaps and disparities in care, access, and capacity. But these efforts and goals are also driving a potential reframing of knowledge in powerful ways, and positioning a new disciplinary approach to mental health. GMH seeks to cultivate and grow this emerging distinct discipline of ‘global mental health’, and the new knowledge and paradigms that should come from it.
期刊最新文献
A response to criticism of the global mental health movement. How polarization can be overcome in theory and in west African social psychiatric practice. The impact of task-sharing scalable mental health interventions on non-specialist providers: a scoping review. Living with psychosis in West and Southeast Africa: SUCCEED Africa's four-country situation analysis. Early intervention in psychosis programs in Africa, Asia and Latin America; challenges and recommendations. Differences in severity of depression symptoms in overweight, obese and normal weight Palestinian children and adolescents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1