Classification of mental disorder in primary care.

R Jenkins, N Smeeton, M Shepherd
{"title":"Classification of mental disorder in primary care.","authors":"R Jenkins,&nbsp;N Smeeton,&nbsp;M Shepherd","doi":"10.1017/s0264180100001995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This monograph describes a study designed to test how far the two major international systems of disease classification, International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and International Classification of Health Problems in Primary Care (ICHPPC), can be consistently applied by General Practitioners (GPs) to mental disorder presenting in primary care, and to identify sources of observer variation occurring at different stages of clinical judgement. A group of 27 senior GPs was exposed to a series of real life general practice consultations, either in the form of videotape or written case-vignette material, chosen to reflect a wide range of minor psychiatric problems, differing not only in respect of phenomenology but also of their associations with social stresses and supports, physical illness and personality features. The findings clearly indicate that neither ICD nor ICHPPC can be applied consistently by GPs. However, while the overall diagnostic concordance using ICD and ICHPPC proved to be disappointingly low, agreement on individual observations relating to psychological, physical, personality and social features was moderately good. It was also noted that participants, when given the opportunity, tended to incorporate several domains into their diagnostic conclusions, aiming for a multidimensional formulation, to which neither ICD nor ICHPPC lend themselves. It is, therefore, not surprising that if the principal diagnostic schemata are neither adequate in themselves nor readily applicable to primary care, then GPs are more likely to resort to symptomatic treatment and evade diagnosis when confronted with minor psychiatric morbidity. The consequence of this approach for National Morbidity Surveys and drug trials are discussed. The historical development of multiaxial schemata of classification is briefly traced, the problems associated with DSM-III are discussed, and a comprehensive model of classification is proposed which incorporates the notions of severity and duration as well as of category on the four dimensions of psychological illness, social stresses and supports, personality and physical illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":77338,"journal":{"name":"Psychological medicine. Monograph supplement","volume":"12 ","pages":"1-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/s0264180100001995","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological medicine. Monograph supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0264180100001995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

This monograph describes a study designed to test how far the two major international systems of disease classification, International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and International Classification of Health Problems in Primary Care (ICHPPC), can be consistently applied by General Practitioners (GPs) to mental disorder presenting in primary care, and to identify sources of observer variation occurring at different stages of clinical judgement. A group of 27 senior GPs was exposed to a series of real life general practice consultations, either in the form of videotape or written case-vignette material, chosen to reflect a wide range of minor psychiatric problems, differing not only in respect of phenomenology but also of their associations with social stresses and supports, physical illness and personality features. The findings clearly indicate that neither ICD nor ICHPPC can be applied consistently by GPs. However, while the overall diagnostic concordance using ICD and ICHPPC proved to be disappointingly low, agreement on individual observations relating to psychological, physical, personality and social features was moderately good. It was also noted that participants, when given the opportunity, tended to incorporate several domains into their diagnostic conclusions, aiming for a multidimensional formulation, to which neither ICD nor ICHPPC lend themselves. It is, therefore, not surprising that if the principal diagnostic schemata are neither adequate in themselves nor readily applicable to primary care, then GPs are more likely to resort to symptomatic treatment and evade diagnosis when confronted with minor psychiatric morbidity. The consequence of this approach for National Morbidity Surveys and drug trials are discussed. The historical development of multiaxial schemata of classification is briefly traced, the problems associated with DSM-III are discussed, and a comprehensive model of classification is proposed which incorporates the notions of severity and duration as well as of category on the four dimensions of psychological illness, social stresses and supports, personality and physical illness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级保健中的精神障碍分类。
本专著描述了一项研究,旨在测试两种主要的国际疾病分类系统,国际疾病分类(ICD)和国际初级保健健康问题分类(ICHPPC),在多大程度上可以被全科医生(gp)一致地应用于初级保健中出现的精神障碍,并确定在临床判断的不同阶段发生的观察者变异的来源。一组27名资深全科医生接触了一系列现实生活中的全科医生咨询,要么以录像带的形式,要么以书面案例小插图的形式,选择反映广泛的轻微精神问题,不仅在现象学上不同,而且与社会压力和支持、身体疾病和个性特征的联系也不同。研究结果清楚地表明,ICD和icppc都不能被全科医生一致地应用。然而,虽然使用ICD和icppc的总体诊断一致性被证明是令人失望的低,但与心理,身体,个性和社会特征相关的个人观察结果的一致性是中等好的。与会者还指出,一旦有机会,与会者倾向于将若干领域纳入其诊断结论,目的是形成一种多维的表述,而ICD和icppc都不适合这种表述。因此,不足为奇的是,如果主要的诊断图式本身不充分,也不容易适用于初级保健,那么全科医生更有可能在遇到轻微的精神疾病时求助于对症治疗,逃避诊断。讨论了这种方法对国家发病率调查和药物试验的影响。本文简要回顾了多轴分类模式的发展历史,讨论了DSM-III中存在的问题,并提出了一种综合的分类模型,该模型包括心理疾病、社会压力和支持、人格和身体疾病四个维度的严重程度和持续时间概念以及类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Community-based psychiatry: long-term patterns of care in South-Verona. Noise, noise sensitivity and psychiatric disorder: epidemiological and psychophysiological studies. Schizophrenia: manifestations, incidence and course in different cultures. A World Health Organization ten-country study. A diagnostic analysis of the Casebooks of Ticehurst House Asylum, 1845-1890. Community-based psychiatry: long-term patterns of care in South-Verona.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1