Jannie Dressler , Morten Rasmussen , Lars N. Jørgensen , Liza Sopina
{"title":"Reduced healthcare costs for patients with screen-detected colorectal cancer: A Danish nationwide cohort study","authors":"Jannie Dressler , Morten Rasmussen , Lars N. Jørgensen , Liza Sopina","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2024.12.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This Danish nationwide retrospective register-based cohort study investigated healthcare costs for patients with screen-detected colorectal cancer (SD-CRC) compared to non-screen-detected CRC (NSD-CRC).</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Nationwide cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Quarterly healthcare costs including costs of hospital care, out-of-hospital medication, and primary sector contacts were compared between the two groups from two years before diagnosis of CRC until two years after. A quasi-experimental difference-in-differences analysis was performed to estimate the differences per patient in total quarterly healthcare costs between the groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 13,852 patients were included, 4703 with SD-CRC, 7420 with NSD-CRC, and 1,729 with interval- or post-colonoscopy CRC (I-PC-CRC). The total quarterly healthcare costs per patient were significantly higher in the NSD-CRC group than in SD-CRC. This was consistent across the total period and in 6-month analyses, accruing additional €16,600 of costs for patients with NSD-CRC over two years after diagnosis. Total healthcare costs were significantly higher for patients with NSD-CRC as compared to patients with SD-CRC across all Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stages, except for UICC stage I. Correspondingly, total costs associated with I-PC-CRC were significantly higher than for SD-CRC.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Apart from improving post-treatment outcomes, higher participation rates in the CRC screening programmes present an opportunity for reducing healthcare costs related to patients diagnosed with CRC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"239 ","pages":"Pages 62-69"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350624005341","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
This Danish nationwide retrospective register-based cohort study investigated healthcare costs for patients with screen-detected colorectal cancer (SD-CRC) compared to non-screen-detected CRC (NSD-CRC).
Study design
Nationwide cohort study.
Methods
Quarterly healthcare costs including costs of hospital care, out-of-hospital medication, and primary sector contacts were compared between the two groups from two years before diagnosis of CRC until two years after. A quasi-experimental difference-in-differences analysis was performed to estimate the differences per patient in total quarterly healthcare costs between the groups.
Results
A total of 13,852 patients were included, 4703 with SD-CRC, 7420 with NSD-CRC, and 1,729 with interval- or post-colonoscopy CRC (I-PC-CRC). The total quarterly healthcare costs per patient were significantly higher in the NSD-CRC group than in SD-CRC. This was consistent across the total period and in 6-month analyses, accruing additional €16,600 of costs for patients with NSD-CRC over two years after diagnosis. Total healthcare costs were significantly higher for patients with NSD-CRC as compared to patients with SD-CRC across all Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stages, except for UICC stage I. Correspondingly, total costs associated with I-PC-CRC were significantly higher than for SD-CRC.
Conclusions
Apart from improving post-treatment outcomes, higher participation rates in the CRC screening programmes present an opportunity for reducing healthcare costs related to patients diagnosed with CRC.
期刊介绍:
Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.