Caregiving Satisfaction, Psychological Distress and Caregiver Burden in Family Caregivers of Dependent Older People: A Longitudinal Study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Clinical Nursing Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1111/jocn.17626
Catalina López-Martínez, Vasiliki Orgeta, Belén Gutiérrez-Sánchez, Rafael Del-Pino-Casado
{"title":"Caregiving Satisfaction, Psychological Distress and Caregiver Burden in Family Caregivers of Dependent Older People: A Longitudinal Study.","authors":"Catalina López-Martínez, Vasiliki Orgeta, Belén Gutiérrez-Sánchez, Rafael Del-Pino-Casado","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Although a substantial amount of research has focused on negative aspects of caregiving, less research has been conducted investigating positive aspects of providing informal care. The aim of this study was to investigate the longitudinal association between caregiving satisfaction and psychological distress in informal carers of dependent older people, and whether this relationship is mediated by caregiver burden.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Prospective longitudinal study with a probabilistic sample of 332 caregivers of older relatives, with data collected at baseline and at 1-year follow-up. We measured caregiving satisfaction, psychological distress, subjective caregiver burden and several covariates (caregivers' sex, age and objective caregiver burden). Data were analysed using generalised estimation equations with multiple imputation. The STROBE checklist was used to support the writing of this document.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After controlling for covariates, caregiving satisfaction was significantly negatively associated with lower levels of subjective caregiver burden (B = -0.17, 95% CI: -0.23, -0.11) and emotional distress (B = -0.23, 95% CI: -0.36, -0.11). When subjective burden was included in the model, the relationship between caregiving satisfaction and psychological distress was no longer significant (B = -0.11, 95% CI: -0.23, 0.02), whereas the association between subjective burden and psychological distress remained (B = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.57, 0.92). The Sobel test confirmed these results (p < 0.001), indicating that subjective caregiver burden mediates the relationship between caregiving satisfaction and psychological distress (complete mediation) over time.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Caregiving satisfaction exerts a longitudinal protective effect on carers' psychological distress via subjective burden. Our findings indicate that interventions aimed at strengthening caregiving satisfaction may play a significant role in maintaining positive mental health outcomes for informal caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17626","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Although a substantial amount of research has focused on negative aspects of caregiving, less research has been conducted investigating positive aspects of providing informal care. The aim of this study was to investigate the longitudinal association between caregiving satisfaction and psychological distress in informal carers of dependent older people, and whether this relationship is mediated by caregiver burden.

Research design and methods: Prospective longitudinal study with a probabilistic sample of 332 caregivers of older relatives, with data collected at baseline and at 1-year follow-up. We measured caregiving satisfaction, psychological distress, subjective caregiver burden and several covariates (caregivers' sex, age and objective caregiver burden). Data were analysed using generalised estimation equations with multiple imputation. The STROBE checklist was used to support the writing of this document.

Results: After controlling for covariates, caregiving satisfaction was significantly negatively associated with lower levels of subjective caregiver burden (B = -0.17, 95% CI: -0.23, -0.11) and emotional distress (B = -0.23, 95% CI: -0.36, -0.11). When subjective burden was included in the model, the relationship between caregiving satisfaction and psychological distress was no longer significant (B = -0.11, 95% CI: -0.23, 0.02), whereas the association between subjective burden and psychological distress remained (B = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.57, 0.92). The Sobel test confirmed these results (p < 0.001), indicating that subjective caregiver burden mediates the relationship between caregiving satisfaction and psychological distress (complete mediation) over time.

Discussion and implications: Caregiving satisfaction exerts a longitudinal protective effect on carers' psychological distress via subjective burden. Our findings indicate that interventions aimed at strengthening caregiving satisfaction may play a significant role in maintaining positive mental health outcomes for informal caregivers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
赡养老年人家庭照顾者的照顾满意度、心理困扰与照顾者负担:一项纵向研究
背景和目的:虽然大量的研究集中在照顾的消极方面,但很少有研究调查提供非正式照顾的积极方面。摘要本研究旨在探讨受赡养老年人非正式照顾者的照顾满意度与心理困扰之间的纵向关系,以及这种关系是否受照顾者负担的调节。研究设计和方法:前瞻性纵向研究,随机抽样332名老年亲属的照顾者,在基线和1年随访时收集数据。我们测量了照顾满意度、心理困扰、主观照顾者负担和几个协变量(照顾者的性别、年龄和客观照顾者负担)。数据分析采用广义估计方程与多重输入。STROBE检查表用于支持本文档的编写。结果:控制协变量后,护理满意度与较低水平的主观照顾者负担(B = -0.17, 95% CI: -0.23, -0.11)和情绪困扰(B = -0.23, 95% CI: -0.36, -0.11)呈显著负相关。将主观负担纳入模型后,护理满意度与心理困扰之间的关系不再显著(B = -0.11, 95% CI: -0.23, 0.02),而主观负担与心理困扰之间的关系仍然存在(B = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.57, 0.92)。讨论与启示:照顾满意度通过主观负担对照顾者心理困扰产生纵向保护效应。我们的研究结果表明,旨在加强照顾满意度的干预措施可能在维持非正式照顾者的积极心理健康结果方面发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, attitudes and practices of nurses regarding airway clearance in neurocritical illness patients: A cross-sectional study. Capturing patient mobility levels in the hospital: An examination of nursing charting and behavioural mapping. Model of predicting fear of cancer recurrence in patients with digestive tract cancer: A cross-sectional study. Nurse judgements of hospitalized patients' safety concerns are affected by patient, nurse and event characteristics: A factorial survey experiment. Prevalence and characteristics of the 'bad feeling' among healthcare professionals in the context of emergency situations: A Bi-Hospital Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1