Self-efficacy Through Digital Care Plan Participation.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1097/CIN.0000000000001220
Justin M Smith, Laura A Christopherson, Sarah B Harper, William S Harmsen
{"title":"Self-efficacy Through Digital Care Plan Participation.","authors":"Justin M Smith, Laura A Christopherson, Sarah B Harper, William S Harmsen","doi":"10.1097/CIN.0000000000001220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concept of self-care is a foundational construct of individual health and wellness. Facilitated self-care is the next logical step in society's uptake of technology for previously high-touch clinical activities, such as patient education and frequent biometric data tracking. This retrospective study aimed to assess whether participation in a digital interactive care plan correlated with an increase in participants' perceived self-efficacy as measured by a change in the Shortened Perceived Medical Condition Self-management Scale score from baseline to end-of-care plan. We included adult patients who were enrolled in at least one of 15 different interactive care plans at our institution between October 21, 2021, and December 30, 2022. Among 3196 patients included, 48.7% of participants did not complete the Shortened Perceived Medical Condition Self-management Scale assessment at baseline, and 73.5% did not complete it at end-of-care plan. For those who completed both assessments (n = 848), 52.2% had no change in their reported self-efficacy on completion of care plan. Similar percentages of patients had increased and decreased scores (25.6% vs 21.9%). The low completion rates were not sufficient to answer the research questions and generalize results. They also underscore the importance of patient engagement for understanding health outcomes associated with implementation of digital health solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50694,"journal":{"name":"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000001220","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of self-care is a foundational construct of individual health and wellness. Facilitated self-care is the next logical step in society's uptake of technology for previously high-touch clinical activities, such as patient education and frequent biometric data tracking. This retrospective study aimed to assess whether participation in a digital interactive care plan correlated with an increase in participants' perceived self-efficacy as measured by a change in the Shortened Perceived Medical Condition Self-management Scale score from baseline to end-of-care plan. We included adult patients who were enrolled in at least one of 15 different interactive care plans at our institution between October 21, 2021, and December 30, 2022. Among 3196 patients included, 48.7% of participants did not complete the Shortened Perceived Medical Condition Self-management Scale assessment at baseline, and 73.5% did not complete it at end-of-care plan. For those who completed both assessments (n = 848), 52.2% had no change in their reported self-efficacy on completion of care plan. Similar percentages of patients had increased and decreased scores (25.6% vs 21.9%). The low completion rates were not sufficient to answer the research questions and generalize results. They also underscore the importance of patient engagement for understanding health outcomes associated with implementation of digital health solutions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过数字护理计划参与的自我效能。
自我照顾的概念是个人健康的基本概念。便利的自我护理是社会对先前高接触临床活动(如患者教育和频繁的生物特征数据跟踪)采用技术的下一个合乎逻辑的步骤。本回顾性研究旨在评估参与数字交互式护理计划是否与参与者感知自我效能感的增加相关,通过缩短感知医疗状况自我管理量表从基线到临终关怀计划的变化来衡量。我们纳入了在2021年10月21日至2022年12月30日期间参加我们机构15种不同互动护理计划中至少一种的成年患者。在纳入的3196名患者中,48.7%的参与者在基线时没有完成缩短感知医疗状况自我管理量表评估,73.5%的参与者在临终关怀计划时没有完成。对于完成两项评估的患者(n = 848), 52.2%的患者在完成护理计划后报告的自我效能感没有变化。相似比例的患者评分升高或降低(25.6% vs 21.9%)。较低的完成率不足以回答研究问题和概括结果。它们还强调了患者参与对了解与实施数字卫生解决方案相关的健康结果的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing
Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing 工程技术-护理
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 30 years, CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing has been at the interface of the science of information and the art of nursing, publishing articles on the latest developments in nursing informatics, research, education and administrative of health information technology. CIN connects you with colleagues as they share knowledge on implementation of electronic health records systems, design decision-support systems, incorporate evidence-based healthcare in practice, explore point-of-care computing in practice and education, and conceptually integrate nursing languages and standard data sets. Continuing education contact hours are available in every issue.
期刊最新文献
Using a Mobile Application Disease Self-management Program to Promote Blood Pressure Control and Quality of Life in Patients With Hypertension. Perspectives of Therapeutic Alliance Using Telemental Health for Adolescents: A Scoping Review. Usability Test for a Smart Glass-Based Application to Support Nurses' Hospital Admission Tasks. The Effect of a Mobile-Supported Venous Thromboembolism Training Program on Surgical Nurses' Knowledge and Practices. Developing and Evaluating a Mobile Application Self-management Program for Patients with Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: An Experimental Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1