Contemporary uses of "lethal" or "life limiting" terminology in perinatal research.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1097/GCO.0000000000001010
Luke A Gatta, Allison M McCarthy, Sarah S Osmundson
{"title":"Contemporary uses of \"lethal\" or \"life limiting\" terminology in perinatal research.","authors":"Luke A Gatta, Allison M McCarthy, Sarah S Osmundson","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000001010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>A life-limiting fetal diagnosis (LLD) refers to a medical condition identified during pregnancy that is expected to lead to stillbirth, preclude ex utero survival, or significantly reduce neonatal life expectancy. The terms 'lethal' or 'life-limiting' are used to prognosticate early death for various anatomic or physiologic causes, although the expected timeframe is nonspecific. The purpose of this manuscript is to review how the terms 'lethal' or 'life limiting' are used in contemporary perinatal research.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Depending on the study design, 'life-limiting' is defined either prior to data analysis (such as prospective cohort studies), or after outcomes are assessed (such as case series). When 'life-limiting' is defined prior to data analysis, study-specific specific definitions may include timeframes from birth to death, probability of neonatal mortality, or a list of diagnoses based off billing codes.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Professional societies have guidelines to standardize the reporting of vital statistics, including early death. While these fall short of defining LLDs comprehensively, they present an opportunity for more specific prognostication following prenatal diagnosis, which may improve research standardization to facilitate a clearer understanding of LLDs in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"49-54"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000001010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: A life-limiting fetal diagnosis (LLD) refers to a medical condition identified during pregnancy that is expected to lead to stillbirth, preclude ex utero survival, or significantly reduce neonatal life expectancy. The terms 'lethal' or 'life-limiting' are used to prognosticate early death for various anatomic or physiologic causes, although the expected timeframe is nonspecific. The purpose of this manuscript is to review how the terms 'lethal' or 'life limiting' are used in contemporary perinatal research.

Recent findings: Depending on the study design, 'life-limiting' is defined either prior to data analysis (such as prospective cohort studies), or after outcomes are assessed (such as case series). When 'life-limiting' is defined prior to data analysis, study-specific specific definitions may include timeframes from birth to death, probability of neonatal mortality, or a list of diagnoses based off billing codes.

Summary: Professional societies have guidelines to standardize the reporting of vital statistics, including early death. While these fall short of defining LLDs comprehensively, they present an opportunity for more specific prognostication following prenatal diagnosis, which may improve research standardization to facilitate a clearer understanding of LLDs in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围产期研究中“致命”或“生命限制”术语的当代使用。
综述目的:限制生命的胎儿诊断(LLD)是指在怀孕期间发现的一种医学状况,预计会导致死产,排除体外存活,或显著降低新生儿的预期寿命。术语“致命”或“生命限制”用于预测各种解剖或生理原因导致的早期死亡,尽管预期的时间框架是非特异性的。本手稿的目的是审查如何术语“致命”或“生命限制”是在当代围产期研究中使用。最近的发现:根据不同的研究设计,“限制生命”的定义要么是在数据分析之前(如前瞻性队列研究),要么是在评估结果之后(如病例系列)。当在数据分析之前定义“生命限制”时,研究特定的特定定义可能包括从出生到死亡的时间范围、新生儿死亡率或基于计费代码的诊断列表。摘要:专业协会有规范生命统计报告的指导方针,包括早期死亡。虽然这些不能全面地定义LLDs,但它们为产前诊断后更具体的预测提供了机会,这可能会提高研究标准化,以促进临床实践中对LLDs的更清晰理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With eleven disciplines published across the year – including reproductive endocrinology, gynecologic cancer and fertility– every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
期刊最新文献
Access to maternity care: challenges and solutions for improving equity across US communities. Contemporary uses of "lethal" or "life limiting" terminology in perinatal research. Rho(D) immune globulin shortage and fetal Rh(D) screening with cell-free DNA. State of the art endocrine treatments for patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer in 2025. Sleep disturbance and menopause.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1