False-Negative Review from the Mammography Audit: Refining Breast Imaging Practice.
Heather V Garrett, Jennie E Brodsky, Tabassum Ahmad, Christina M Doherty, Michelle V Lee, Elizabeth McFarland, Debbie L Bennett
求助PDF
{"title":"False-Negative Review from the Mammography Audit: Refining Breast Imaging Practice.","authors":"Heather V Garrett, Jennie E Brodsky, Tabassum Ahmad, Christina M Doherty, Michelle V Lee, Elizabeth McFarland, Debbie L Bennett","doi":"10.1148/rg.240128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Annual review of false-negative (FN) mammograms is a mandatory and critical component of the Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) annual mammography audit. FN review can help hone reading skills and improve the ability to detect cancers at mammography. Subtle architectural distortion, asymmetries (seen only on one view), small lesions, lesions with probably benign appearance (circumscribed regular borders), isolated microcalcifications, and skin thickening are the most common mammographic findings when the malignancy is visible at retrospective review of FN mammograms. Most FN mammograms are not due to radiologist error. There are common and predictable settings in which FN mammograms occur. Patient factors associated with elevated FN mammograms include dense breasts, elevated lifetime risk of breast cancer, and personal history of breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and radiation therapy. About half of FN cancers are detected by supplemental screening examinations and half manifest clinically. The most common manifesting symptoms for interval cancers are a palpable abnormality, nipple discharge, and skin changes. Interval cancers can have more aggressive pathologic features and higher rates of node positivity. The FN review includes Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 3 cases that develop a cancer diagnosis during surveillance. Nonbreast malignancies diagnosed as interval cancers (most commonly lymphoma and metastatic disease) do not need to be counted as FNs for audit purposes. The FN review and annual audit are confidential processes that protect patient and radiologist information while allowing meaningful quality control and improvement. Although FN mammograms are rare, review of these cases is a valuable educational tool. The slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting is available for this article. <sup>©</sup>RSNA, 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":54512,"journal":{"name":"Radiographics","volume":"45 2","pages":"e240128"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiographics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.240128","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
Annual review of false-negative (FN) mammograms is a mandatory and critical component of the Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) annual mammography audit. FN review can help hone reading skills and improve the ability to detect cancers at mammography. Subtle architectural distortion, asymmetries (seen only on one view), small lesions, lesions with probably benign appearance (circumscribed regular borders), isolated microcalcifications, and skin thickening are the most common mammographic findings when the malignancy is visible at retrospective review of FN mammograms. Most FN mammograms are not due to radiologist error. There are common and predictable settings in which FN mammograms occur. Patient factors associated with elevated FN mammograms include dense breasts, elevated lifetime risk of breast cancer, and personal history of breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and radiation therapy. About half of FN cancers are detected by supplemental screening examinations and half manifest clinically. The most common manifesting symptoms for interval cancers are a palpable abnormality, nipple discharge, and skin changes. Interval cancers can have more aggressive pathologic features and higher rates of node positivity. The FN review includes Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 3 cases that develop a cancer diagnosis during surveillance. Nonbreast malignancies diagnosed as interval cancers (most commonly lymphoma and metastatic disease) do not need to be counted as FNs for audit purposes. The FN review and annual audit are confidential processes that protect patient and radiologist information while allowing meaningful quality control and improvement. Although FN mammograms are rare, review of these cases is a valuable educational tool. The slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting is available for this article. © RSNA, 2025.
乳房x线摄影审核的假阴性评论:改进乳房成像实践。
假阴性(FN)乳房x光检查的年度审查是乳房x光检查质量标准法案(MQSA)年度乳房x光检查审计的强制性和关键组成部分。FN回顾有助于磨练阅读技能,提高乳房x光检查发现癌症的能力。当回顾性检查FN乳房x光检查发现恶性肿瘤时,最常见的表现是轻微的结构扭曲、不对称(仅在一个视图上可见)、小病变、可能呈良性外观的病变(边界有边界规则)、孤立的微钙化和皮肤增厚。大多数FN乳房x光检查不是由于放射科医生的错误。FN乳房x光检查有常见和可预测的情况。与FN x光检查升高相关的患者因素包括乳房致密、乳腺癌终生风险升高以及接受过乳房肿瘤切除术和放疗的个人乳腺癌病史。大约一半的FN癌是通过补充筛查检查发现的,一半是临床表现。间隔期癌最常见的症状是可触及的异常、乳头溢液和皮肤变化。间隔期癌具有更强侵袭性的病理特征和更高的淋巴结阳性率。FN审查包括乳房成像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS) 3例在监测期间诊断为癌症的病例。诊断为间期癌的非乳腺恶性肿瘤(最常见的是淋巴瘤和转移性疾病)在审计时不需要计算为fn。FN审查和年度审计是保密过程,保护患者和放射科医生的信息,同时允许有意义的质量控制和改进。虽然FN乳房x光检查是罕见的,回顾这些病例是一个有价值的教育工具。本文提供了RSNA年会的幻灯片演示。©RSNA, 2025年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。