Outcomes of Age-Friendly Health Systems: Return to Clinic After 4Ms Care Delivery.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/00469580241309194
Grace Q Armstrong, Heba M Aldossary, Jessica Bingham, Lilia Pino, Anne Pohnert, Mary A Dolansky, Nicholas K Schiltz
{"title":"Outcomes of Age-Friendly Health Systems: Return to Clinic After 4Ms Care Delivery.","authors":"Grace Q Armstrong, Heba M Aldossary, Jessica Bingham, Lilia Pino, Anne Pohnert, Mary A Dolansky, Nicholas K Schiltz","doi":"10.1177/00469580241309194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Age-Friendly Health System (AFHS) movement continues to grow in the United States as more health systems implement the 4Ms framework. Despite this growth, there are relatively few studies that evaluate outcomes related to AFHS implementation. This study assessed patient satisfaction with AFHS by analyzing the rate at which patients returned to the clinic for future health care, serving as a measure of quality. A retrospective cohort design using electronic health record (EHR) data obtained from patients 65 years of age and older who received care at a large national network of convenient care clinics in the U.S. (<i>N</i> = 987,197) between January 2021 and March 2024. We assessed the level of AFHS 4Ms care received by these individuals in relation to their subsequent visit back to the clinic through descriptive statistics, a time-to-event analysis using the Kaplan-Meier cumulative incidence approach, and a Cox proportional Hazards model, adjusted for age, race, sex, prior appointments, and number of ICD-10 code diagnoses. Throughout the study period, patients who received complete AFHS 4Ms care exhibited greater rates of returning to the convenient care clinic compared to those who received partial or no 4Ms 4Ms care. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that the cumulative probability of returning to the clinic was higher in patients that received 4Ms over time, compared to patients that did not receive 4Ms. Results from the Cox Proportional Hazards model demonstrated a risk ratio of 3.91 (<i>p</i> < .001) of returning to the clinic, after adjustment. The results indicate that patients are more likely to seek additional care in the future at the same health system when they receive complete 4Ms care, possibly due to increased satisfaction with care. As patient satisfaction is an indicator of quality care, this finding can further inform and spread the AFHS movement.</p>","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":"62 ","pages":"469580241309194"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11707770/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580241309194","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Age-Friendly Health System (AFHS) movement continues to grow in the United States as more health systems implement the 4Ms framework. Despite this growth, there are relatively few studies that evaluate outcomes related to AFHS implementation. This study assessed patient satisfaction with AFHS by analyzing the rate at which patients returned to the clinic for future health care, serving as a measure of quality. A retrospective cohort design using electronic health record (EHR) data obtained from patients 65 years of age and older who received care at a large national network of convenient care clinics in the U.S. (N = 987,197) between January 2021 and March 2024. We assessed the level of AFHS 4Ms care received by these individuals in relation to their subsequent visit back to the clinic through descriptive statistics, a time-to-event analysis using the Kaplan-Meier cumulative incidence approach, and a Cox proportional Hazards model, adjusted for age, race, sex, prior appointments, and number of ICD-10 code diagnoses. Throughout the study period, patients who received complete AFHS 4Ms care exhibited greater rates of returning to the convenient care clinic compared to those who received partial or no 4Ms 4Ms care. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that the cumulative probability of returning to the clinic was higher in patients that received 4Ms over time, compared to patients that did not receive 4Ms. Results from the Cox Proportional Hazards model demonstrated a risk ratio of 3.91 (p < .001) of returning to the clinic, after adjustment. The results indicate that patients are more likely to seek additional care in the future at the same health system when they receive complete 4Ms care, possibly due to increased satisfaction with care. As patient satisfaction is an indicator of quality care, this finding can further inform and spread the AFHS movement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: INQUIRY is a peer-reviewed open access journal whose msision is to to improve health by sharing research spanning health care, including public health, health services, and health policy.
期刊最新文献
Examples from US Policies to Reduce Oversupply and Overutilization: Lessons for the Japanese Health Care System. Outcomes of Age-Friendly Health Systems: Return to Clinic After 4Ms Care Delivery. Patient Autonomy in Medical Education: Navigating Ethical Challenges in the Age of Artificial Intelligence Developing the First Digital Occupational Therapy Dictionary Worldwide: A Promising Mobile Application Model for Occupational Therapy Service Providers and Recipients Highlighting the Neuropsychological Consequences of COVID-19: Evidence From a Narrative Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1