Study protocol for a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation trial of a team-based implementation strategy to support educators' use of a social engagement intervention.

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Implementation Science Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1186/s13012-024-01414-3
Jill Locke, Aksheya Sridhar, Wendy Shih, Stephanie Shire, Andria B Eisman, Emily Kim, Adora Du, Christine Espeland, Connie Kasari
{"title":"Study protocol for a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation trial of a team-based implementation strategy to support educators' use of a social engagement intervention.","authors":"Jill Locke, Aksheya Sridhar, Wendy Shih, Stephanie Shire, Andria B Eisman, Emily Kim, Adora Du, Christine Espeland, Connie Kasari","doi":"10.1186/s13012-024-01414-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remaking Recess (RR) is a school-based evidence-based peer social engagement intervention for autistic students. RR involves direct training and coaching with educators; however, educators face several barriers to implementation at both the individual- and organizational-levels. This protocol paper describes a multi-site study that will test whether an educator-level implementation strategy, coaching, with or without a school-level implementation strategy, school-based teams, will maximize educators' use (fidelity and sustainment) of RR for autistic students and their peers who are socially-isolated, rejected, or peripheral and may need additional support during recess.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study will employ a hybrid type-3 effectiveness-implementation trial. Fifty-five elementary schools will be recruited as well as 121 educators (e.g., classroom assistants, aides), 55 general and special educator teachers, and 83-138 other school personnel (e.g., administrators). Additionally, at least 118 autistic students and allistic or non-autistic classmates will be recruited as RR recipients. Participants will complete baseline assessments at the beginning of the year, and all schools will be provided RR training. Schools will be randomized to coaching with or without school-based teams. This study will measure RR fidelity (primary outcome), RR sustainment, as well as peer engagement, social network inclusion, and social skills (secondary outcomes). It is expected that coaching with school-based teams will improve both RR fidelity and social network inclusion, while coaching with and without school-based teams will result in improved peer engagement and social skills.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Previous research has documented barriers to RR implementation at both the individual- (provider) and organization-level (school). Using multi-level implementation strategies such as coaching with school-based teams may address these barriers and support RR implementation in schools. Findings from this study may guide future efforts to scale up tailored implementation strategies for use in public school districts, with the ultimate goal of increasing intervention access and improving student outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Name of the Registry: clinicaltrials.gov.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Trials ID: NCT06559267 . Date of Registration: August 15, 2024. Prospectively registered.</p>","PeriodicalId":54995,"journal":{"name":"Implementation Science","volume":"20 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721225/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-024-01414-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Remaking Recess (RR) is a school-based evidence-based peer social engagement intervention for autistic students. RR involves direct training and coaching with educators; however, educators face several barriers to implementation at both the individual- and organizational-levels. This protocol paper describes a multi-site study that will test whether an educator-level implementation strategy, coaching, with or without a school-level implementation strategy, school-based teams, will maximize educators' use (fidelity and sustainment) of RR for autistic students and their peers who are socially-isolated, rejected, or peripheral and may need additional support during recess.

Methods: This study will employ a hybrid type-3 effectiveness-implementation trial. Fifty-five elementary schools will be recruited as well as 121 educators (e.g., classroom assistants, aides), 55 general and special educator teachers, and 83-138 other school personnel (e.g., administrators). Additionally, at least 118 autistic students and allistic or non-autistic classmates will be recruited as RR recipients. Participants will complete baseline assessments at the beginning of the year, and all schools will be provided RR training. Schools will be randomized to coaching with or without school-based teams. This study will measure RR fidelity (primary outcome), RR sustainment, as well as peer engagement, social network inclusion, and social skills (secondary outcomes). It is expected that coaching with school-based teams will improve both RR fidelity and social network inclusion, while coaching with and without school-based teams will result in improved peer engagement and social skills.

Discussion: Previous research has documented barriers to RR implementation at both the individual- (provider) and organization-level (school). Using multi-level implementation strategies such as coaching with school-based teams may address these barriers and support RR implementation in schools. Findings from this study may guide future efforts to scale up tailored implementation strategies for use in public school districts, with the ultimate goal of increasing intervention access and improving student outcomes.

Trial registration: Name of the Registry: clinicaltrials.gov.

Trial registration: Clinical Trials ID: NCT06559267 . Date of Registration: August 15, 2024. Prospectively registered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持教育工作者使用社会参与干预的基于团队的实施策略的混合型3有效性实施试验的研究方案。
背景:重塑课间休息(RR)是一项以学校为基础的基于证据的自闭症学生同伴社会参与干预。RR包括教育工作者的直接培训和指导;然而,教育工作者在个人和组织层面上都面临着实施的一些障碍。本协议文件描述了一项多地点的研究,该研究将测试教育者层面的实施策略、指导、有或没有学校层面的实施策略、基于学校的团队,是否会最大限度地提高教育者对自闭症学生及其同伴的RR使用(忠诚和维持),这些自闭症学生和他们的同伴是社会孤立的、被拒绝的或边缘的,可能在休息期间需要额外的支持。方法:本研究将采用混合3型有效性-实施试验。将招聘55所小学、121名教育工作者(如课堂助理、助理)、55名普通和特殊教育教师、83-138名其他学校人员(如行政人员)。此外,至少118名自闭症学生和自闭症或非自闭症同学将被招募为RR接受者。参与者将在年初完成基线评估,所有学校都将接受RR培训。学校将被随机分配到有或没有校本团队的学校进行辅导。本研究将测量RR保真度(主要结果)、RR维持,以及同伴参与、社会网络包容和社交技能(次要结果)。预计校本团队的指导将提高RR保真度和社交网络包容性,而有校本团队和没有校本团队的指导将提高同伴参与度和社交技能。讨论:先前的研究已经记录了个体(提供者)和组织(学校)实施RR的障碍。使用多层次的实施策略,如与校本团队进行辅导,可以解决这些障碍,并支持在学校实施RR。本研究的结果可能会指导未来的努力,以扩大在公立学区使用的量身定制的实施策略,最终目标是增加干预机会和改善学生的成绩。试验注册:注册中心名称:clinicaltrials.gov.试验注册:临床试验ID: NCT06559267。注册日期:2024年8月15日。前瞻性登记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Implementation Science
Implementation Science 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Implementation Science is a leading journal committed to disseminating evidence on methods for integrating research findings into routine healthcare practice and policy. It offers a multidisciplinary platform for studying implementation strategies, encompassing their development, outcomes, economics, processes, and associated factors. The journal prioritizes rigorous studies and innovative, theory-based approaches, covering implementation science across various healthcare services and settings.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the comparative effectiveness of ECHO and coaching implementation strategies in a jail/provider MOUD implementation trial. Looking under the hood of a hybrid two-way texting intervention to improve early retention on antiretroviral therapy in Malawi: an implementation fidelity evaluation. Improving the adoption of a school-based nutrition program: findings from a collaborative network of randomised trials. Finding the right dose: a scoping review examining facilitation as an implementation strategy for evidence-based stroke care. Optimizing vaccine uptake in sub-Saharan Africa: a collaborative COVID-19 vaccination campaign in Madagascar using an adaptive approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1