Enhancing shared street accessibility in heritage sites for individuals with visual disabilities: a Canadian perspective.

IF 1.3 Q3 REHABILITATION Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fresc.2024.1419446
M Lakoud, E Morales, A Ruiz-Rodrigo, I Feillou, S Mathieu, F Routhier
{"title":"Enhancing shared street accessibility in heritage sites for individuals with visual disabilities: a Canadian perspective.","authors":"M Lakoud, E Morales, A Ruiz-Rodrigo, I Feillou, S Mathieu, F Routhier","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2024.1419446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Heritage sites often pose significant accessibility challenges for individuals with visual disabilities due to their preserved architectural features and strict regulations against modifications. In shared streets, designed to encourage pedestrian use and reduce vehicle dominance, these challenges are exacerbated by the lack of tactile and directional cues for visually impaired users. This study, set in the context of Canadian heritage sites, explores how shared streets can be adapted to be more inclusive while respecting the integrity of historical environments.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to explore and propose practical solutions to enhance the accessibility of shared streets for individuals with visual disabilities within heritage sites, with a particular focus on preservation requirements.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The study adopts a three-phase methodology. First, co-design sessions were conducted with three groups of stakeholders: people with disabilities, caregivers, and experts in accessibility and heritage preservation. Second, a narrative literature review was undertaken to identify practices from existing research and urban planning cases. Finally, solutions were developed in collaboration with a design firm to create practical, adaptable prototypes that address the specific needs identified in earlier phases.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The co-design sessions revealed several key challenges, including the lack of tactile references, difficulties with snow removal, and the need for clearer delineation between pedestrian and vehicular zones. Solutions such as tactile paving, modular bollards, and the use of contrasting materials were developed to address these issues. The narrative review reinforced the importance of universal design in heritage contexts and provided insights into successful implementations in other urban settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study concludes that shared streets can be made more accessible for individuals with visual disabilities by adopting a modular design approach that integrates tactile cues and adaptable urban furniture. These solutions ensure that accessibility and safety can coexist with heritage preservation, promoting inclusivity in public spaces. The research highlights the importance of stakeholder engagement in the design process and offers a replicable framework for improving accessibility in heritage sites globally. However, further field testing is needed to assess the feasibility and acceptance of these solutions within the regulatory constraints of heritage environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":"5 ","pages":"1419446"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11703866/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2024.1419446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Heritage sites often pose significant accessibility challenges for individuals with visual disabilities due to their preserved architectural features and strict regulations against modifications. In shared streets, designed to encourage pedestrian use and reduce vehicle dominance, these challenges are exacerbated by the lack of tactile and directional cues for visually impaired users. This study, set in the context of Canadian heritage sites, explores how shared streets can be adapted to be more inclusive while respecting the integrity of historical environments.

Objective: The objective of this study is to explore and propose practical solutions to enhance the accessibility of shared streets for individuals with visual disabilities within heritage sites, with a particular focus on preservation requirements.

Methodology: The study adopts a three-phase methodology. First, co-design sessions were conducted with three groups of stakeholders: people with disabilities, caregivers, and experts in accessibility and heritage preservation. Second, a narrative literature review was undertaken to identify practices from existing research and urban planning cases. Finally, solutions were developed in collaboration with a design firm to create practical, adaptable prototypes that address the specific needs identified in earlier phases.

Findings: The co-design sessions revealed several key challenges, including the lack of tactile references, difficulties with snow removal, and the need for clearer delineation between pedestrian and vehicular zones. Solutions such as tactile paving, modular bollards, and the use of contrasting materials were developed to address these issues. The narrative review reinforced the importance of universal design in heritage contexts and provided insights into successful implementations in other urban settings.

Conclusion: The study concludes that shared streets can be made more accessible for individuals with visual disabilities by adopting a modular design approach that integrates tactile cues and adaptable urban furniture. These solutions ensure that accessibility and safety can coexist with heritage preservation, promoting inclusivity in public spaces. The research highlights the importance of stakeholder engagement in the design process and offers a replicable framework for improving accessibility in heritage sites globally. However, further field testing is needed to assess the feasibility and acceptance of these solutions within the regulatory constraints of heritage environments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为视障人士在遗产地加强共享街道的可达性:加拿大的视角。
导读:遗产地由于其保留的建筑特征和严格的禁止修改规定,往往对视力障碍人士构成重大的无障碍挑战。在旨在鼓励行人使用和减少车辆主导的共享街道中,由于缺乏视觉障碍用户的触觉和方向提示,这些挑战变得更加严重。本研究以加拿大遗产遗址为背景,探讨如何在尊重历史环境完整性的同时,使共享街道更具包容性。目的:本研究的目的是探索并提出切实可行的解决方案,以提高文物遗址内视觉障碍者共享街道的可达性,并特别关注保护要求。方法学:本研究采用三阶段方法学。首先,与三组利益相关者进行了共同设计会议:残疾人、护理人员、无障碍和遗产保护专家。其次,对现有研究和城市规划案例进行了叙述性文献综述,以确定实践。最后,解决方案是与设计公司合作开发的,以创建实用的、适应性强的原型,以满足早期阶段确定的特定需求。研究结果:共同设计会议揭示了几个关键挑战,包括缺乏触觉参考,除雪困难,需要更清晰地划定行人和车辆区域。解决方案如触觉铺装、模块化护柱和使用对比材料来解决这些问题。叙述性回顾强调了遗产环境中通用设计的重要性,并为其他城市环境中的成功实施提供了见解。结论:该研究得出结论,通过采用模块化设计方法,将触觉线索和适应性强的城市家具相结合,可以使共享街道更容易为视力障碍人士提供便利。这些解决方案确保了可达性和安全性与遗产保护共存,促进了公共空间的包容性。该研究强调了利益相关者参与设计过程的重要性,并为改善全球遗产地的可达性提供了一个可复制的框架。然而,需要进一步的现场测试来评估这些解决方案在遗产环境的监管约束下的可行性和接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Case Report: Rehabilitation of a giant meniscus cyst with a mixed tear. Preliminary development and evaluation of a mechanical handwriting assistive device to support individuals with movement disorders. Caregiver perceptions of usual care home programs for persons with acquired brain injury: a qualitative descriptive study. Underutilization of coper/non-coper screening in anterior cruciate ligament injuries management in Italy: an online survey. Validation of a tri-axial accelerometer for measuring physical activity in patients with subacute stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1