Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT in Medical Education: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire on students' Competence.

Journal of CME Pub Date : 2024-12-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/28338073.2024.2437293
L Maaß, C Grab-Kroll, J Koerner, W Öchsner, M Schön, Dac Messerer, T M Böckers, Anja Böckers
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT in Medical Education: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire on students' Competence.","authors":"L Maaß, C Grab-Kroll, J Koerner, W Öchsner, M Schön, Dac Messerer, T M Böckers, Anja Böckers","doi":"10.1080/28338073.2024.2437293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming the field of health science and medical education, but less is known about the students´ competencies related to knowledge, skills and attitudes towards the application of AI tools like ChatGPT. Therefore, a unicentric questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was applied to students in the medical field (<i>n</i> = 207). The data revealed that while most students were familiar with ChatGPT (66.7%), other AI tools were significantly less known or utilised for study purposes. Students approached AI tools rather informally, often preferring to use them as a simple search engine. More than half of the students admitted that they were not sufficiently informed about the underlying technology of AI. They applied ChatGPT in a self-directed manner but expressed considerable uncertainty regarding effective prompt engineering and ChatGPT's legal implications. Overall, the majority of respondents showed interest in and positivity towards the introduction of AI. However, they did not feel adequately prepared to handle AI confidently, leading many to express interest in further training. This training should be directly related to students' professional roles, e.g. as a physician. The three most favoured AI-topics for voluntary learning formats were AI in their studies (62.5%), AI in general (58.0%), and the use of AI in scientific writing (57.0%). Notable subgroup differences related to the students\" gender or self-assessed study performance were observed and should be considered in future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":73675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of CME","volume":"14 1","pages":"2437293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11703531/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of CME","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/28338073.2024.2437293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming the field of health science and medical education, but less is known about the students´ competencies related to knowledge, skills and attitudes towards the application of AI tools like ChatGPT. Therefore, a unicentric questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was applied to students in the medical field (n = 207). The data revealed that while most students were familiar with ChatGPT (66.7%), other AI tools were significantly less known or utilised for study purposes. Students approached AI tools rather informally, often preferring to use them as a simple search engine. More than half of the students admitted that they were not sufficiently informed about the underlying technology of AI. They applied ChatGPT in a self-directed manner but expressed considerable uncertainty regarding effective prompt engineering and ChatGPT's legal implications. Overall, the majority of respondents showed interest in and positivity towards the introduction of AI. However, they did not feel adequately prepared to handle AI confidently, leading many to express interest in further training. This training should be directly related to students' professional roles, e.g. as a physician. The three most favoured AI-topics for voluntary learning formats were AI in their studies (62.5%), AI in general (58.0%), and the use of AI in scientific writing (57.0%). Notable subgroup differences related to the students" gender or self-assessed study performance were observed and should be considered in future research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学教育中的人工智能与ChatGPT:学生能力的横断面调查问卷。
人工智能正在迅速改变健康科学和医学教育领域,但人们对学生对ChatGPT等人工智能工具应用的知识、技能和态度的能力知之甚少。因此,我们对医学领域的学生(n = 207)进行了单中心问卷横断面研究。数据显示,虽然大多数学生(66.7%)熟悉ChatGPT,但其他人工智能工具的知名度或用于学习目的的程度明显较低。学生们接触人工智能工具的方式并不正式,他们通常更喜欢把它们当作简单的搜索引擎。超过一半的学生承认,他们对人工智能的底层技术了解不够。他们以自我导向的方式应用ChatGPT,但在有效的提示工程和ChatGPT的法律含义方面表达了相当大的不确定性。总体而言,大多数受访者对引入人工智能表现出兴趣和积极态度。然而,他们并没有自信地做好充分的准备来处理人工智能,这导致许多人表示有兴趣接受进一步的培训。这种培训应该与学生的职业角色直接相关,例如作为一名医生。自愿学习格式中最受欢迎的三个人工智能主题是研究中的人工智能(62.5%)、一般的人工智能(58.0%)和在科学写作中使用人工智能(57.0%)。观察到与学生性别或自我评估学习成绩相关的显著亚组差异,应在未来的研究中予以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction. Revolutionizing Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: Integrating AI-Based Retinal Imaging in Primary Care. Developing an Annual Review of the Literature. Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT in Medical Education: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire on students' Competence. The Future of Generative AI in Continuing Professional Development (CPD): Crowdsourcing the Alliance Community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1