Surgical management of atrioesophageal fistula after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A French nationwide study

Ludovic Dupautet MD , Guillaume Lebreton MD, PhD , Gabriel Saiydoun MD , Thierry Bourguignon MD, PhD , Sébastien Frey MD , Christophe Beaufreton MD, PhD , Géraud Galvaing MD, MSc , Sébastien Cambier MD, MSc , Marc Filaire MD, PhD , Laura Filaire MD, MSc
{"title":"Surgical management of atrioesophageal fistula after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A French nationwide study","authors":"Ludovic Dupautet MD ,&nbsp;Guillaume Lebreton MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Gabriel Saiydoun MD ,&nbsp;Thierry Bourguignon MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Sébastien Frey MD ,&nbsp;Christophe Beaufreton MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Géraud Galvaing MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Sébastien Cambier MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Marc Filaire MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Laura Filaire MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2024.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The study objective was to assess the efficacity of different surgical strategies for atrioesophageal fistula after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between January 2010 and April 2023, all patients with a diagnosis of atrioesophageal fistula or pericardo-esophageal fistula after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation were analyzed retrospectively from the French database EPITHOR. Patients without surgical management were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighteen patients were included, 15 with atrioesophageal fistula and 3 with pericardo-esophageal fistula. Median follow-up was 89.5 days with an overall survival of 50%. Five patients underwent esophageal stenting, 2 as a bridge-to-esophagectomy with 50% of survival and 3 in association with esophagus and left atrial direct repair with 66% survival. Primary esophageal repair with flap coverage was performed in 8 patients with 25% survival, most of them with sepsis and neurological failure. Seven patients had an esophagectomy with 71% survival, only 2 of them having a neurological failure. Among them, 5 patients underwent a restorative surgery and are still alive. Four patients had a retrosternal colon interposition, and 1 patient had an esogastric anastomosis. Risk factors for death were neurological failure (hazard ratio [HR], 4.91, 95% CI, 0.95-25.22; <em>P</em> = .0057) in univariate analysis and sepsis (HR, 6.25, 95% CI, 1.17-33.3; <em>P</em> = .032) in multivariate analysis. Esophagectomy tended to offer a survival benefit (HR, 0.163, 95% CI, 0.019-1.340; <em>P</em> = .092). The use of cardiopulmonary bypass did not significantly impact survival (HR, 1.953, 95% CI, 0.392-9.719; <em>P</em> = .413).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Aggressive surgical strategies for managing atrioesophageal fistula are mandatory to offer the best chance of survival.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"22 ","pages":"Pages 476-484"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704549/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273624002584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The study objective was to assess the efficacity of different surgical strategies for atrioesophageal fistula after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Methods

Between January 2010 and April 2023, all patients with a diagnosis of atrioesophageal fistula or pericardo-esophageal fistula after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation were analyzed retrospectively from the French database EPITHOR. Patients without surgical management were excluded.

Results

Eighteen patients were included, 15 with atrioesophageal fistula and 3 with pericardo-esophageal fistula. Median follow-up was 89.5 days with an overall survival of 50%. Five patients underwent esophageal stenting, 2 as a bridge-to-esophagectomy with 50% of survival and 3 in association with esophagus and left atrial direct repair with 66% survival. Primary esophageal repair with flap coverage was performed in 8 patients with 25% survival, most of them with sepsis and neurological failure. Seven patients had an esophagectomy with 71% survival, only 2 of them having a neurological failure. Among them, 5 patients underwent a restorative surgery and are still alive. Four patients had a retrosternal colon interposition, and 1 patient had an esogastric anastomosis. Risk factors for death were neurological failure (hazard ratio [HR], 4.91, 95% CI, 0.95-25.22; P = .0057) in univariate analysis and sepsis (HR, 6.25, 95% CI, 1.17-33.3; P = .032) in multivariate analysis. Esophagectomy tended to offer a survival benefit (HR, 0.163, 95% CI, 0.019-1.340; P = .092). The use of cardiopulmonary bypass did not significantly impact survival (HR, 1.953, 95% CI, 0.392-9.719; P = .413).

Conclusions

Aggressive surgical strategies for managing atrioesophageal fistula are mandatory to offer the best chance of survival.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心房颤动导管消融后房食管瘘的外科治疗:一项法国全国性研究。
目的:评价心房颤动导管消融后不同术式治疗心房食管瘘的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2010年1月至2023年4月期间,所有心房颤动导管消融后诊断为心房食管瘘或心包食管瘘的患者。未进行手术治疗的患者被排除在外。结果:本组共纳入18例患者,其中心房食管瘘15例,心包食管瘘3例。中位随访时间为89.5天,总生存率为50%。5例患者接受了食管支架置入术,2例作为桥至食管切除术,生存率为50%,3例与食管和左心房直接修复相关,生存率为66%。8例患者行食管皮瓣一期修复术,生存率为25%,其中大部分患者伴有败血症和神经功能衰竭。7例患者进行了食管切除术,71%的患者存活,其中只有2例出现神经功能衰竭。其中5例患者行恢复性手术,目前仍存活。4例胸骨后结肠间置,1例胃食管吻合。死亡的危险因素为神经功能衰竭(风险比[HR], 4.91, 95% CI, 0.95-25.22;P = 0.0057)在单因素分析和脓毒症(HR, 6.25, 95% CI, 1.17-33.3;P = 0.032)。食管切除术倾向于提供生存获益(HR, 0.163, 95% CI, 0.019-1.340;p = .092)。体外循环的使用对生存率无显著影响(HR, 1.953, 95% CI, 0.392-9.719;p = .413)。结论:积极的手术策略是治疗房食管瘘的强制性措施,以提供最佳的生存机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Total aortic arch replacement versus proximal aortic repair for acute type a aortic dissection: A single-center 30-year experience External validation of the German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A score in patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection Distal anastomotic new entry tears and aortic remodeling following type A dissection repair: A systematic review Aortic valve repair in a middle-income country: Exceptional outcomes and mid-term results Tricuspid valve replacement with bioprostheses: Which type fits best?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1