Surgical management of giant cell arteritis of the proximal aorta

Motahar Hosseini MD , Alberto Pochettino MD , Joseph A. Dearani MD , Alejandra Castro-Varela MD , Hartzell V. Schaff MD , Katherine S. King MS , Richard C. Daly MD , Kevin L. Greason MD , Juan A. Crestanello MD , Gabor Bagameri MD , Nishant Saran MBBS
{"title":"Surgical management of giant cell arteritis of the proximal aorta","authors":"Motahar Hosseini MD ,&nbsp;Alberto Pochettino MD ,&nbsp;Joseph A. Dearani MD ,&nbsp;Alejandra Castro-Varela MD ,&nbsp;Hartzell V. Schaff MD ,&nbsp;Katherine S. King MS ,&nbsp;Richard C. Daly MD ,&nbsp;Kevin L. Greason MD ,&nbsp;Juan A. Crestanello MD ,&nbsp;Gabor Bagameri MD ,&nbsp;Nishant Saran MBBS","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2024.08.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Giant cell arteritis (GCA) may present as proximal aortic pathology requiring surgical intervention. We present our experience with surgical management of GCA in patients presenting with proximal aortic disease.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From January 1993 to May 2020, 184 adult patients were diagnosed with GCA on histopathology after undergoing cardiac surgery. Survival was estimated with Kaplan-Meier method. Reoperation rates were estimated with cumulative incidence accounting for competing risks of death.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The most common indication for surgery was ascending aortic aneurysm (n = 179, 97.3%). Stroke occurred in 6 (3.3%), pneumonia in 8 (4.4%), and dialysis in 3 (1.6%) patients. Multivariable analysis found advanced age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.054; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.026-1.082, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), recent heart failure (HR, 1.890; 95% CI, 1.016-3.516, <em>P</em> = .04), peripheral vascular disease (HR, 2.229; 95% CI, 1.458-3.624, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and cerebrovascular disease (HR, 1.762; 95% CI, 1.035-3.000, <em>P</em> = .03) as predictors of late mortality. Median follow-up was 13.7 years, and 30-day mortality was 1.5%. Nineteen patients underwent 24 aortic reinterventions including aortic arch reconstruction (n = 4), descending thoracic aorta aneurysm repair (n = 8), thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair (n = 11), and pseudoaneurysm repair (n = 1). Rate of reintervention on the aorta was 3.9% (95% CI, 1.9%-8.1%), 7.1% (95% CI, 4.1%-12.3%), 12.8% (95% CI, 8.3%-19.6%), and 12.8% (95% CI, 8.3%-19.6%) at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Surgery in patients with GCA can be performed with acceptable early and late outcomes. Advancing age, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, and cerebrovascular disease are risk factors for worse survival. Postoperative surveillance is important as need for aortic reintervention is not uncommon.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"22 ","pages":"Pages 123-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704527/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273624002444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) may present as proximal aortic pathology requiring surgical intervention. We present our experience with surgical management of GCA in patients presenting with proximal aortic disease.

Methods

From January 1993 to May 2020, 184 adult patients were diagnosed with GCA on histopathology after undergoing cardiac surgery. Survival was estimated with Kaplan-Meier method. Reoperation rates were estimated with cumulative incidence accounting for competing risks of death.

Results

The most common indication for surgery was ascending aortic aneurysm (n = 179, 97.3%). Stroke occurred in 6 (3.3%), pneumonia in 8 (4.4%), and dialysis in 3 (1.6%) patients. Multivariable analysis found advanced age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.054; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.026-1.082, P < .001), recent heart failure (HR, 1.890; 95% CI, 1.016-3.516, P = .04), peripheral vascular disease (HR, 2.229; 95% CI, 1.458-3.624, P < .001), and cerebrovascular disease (HR, 1.762; 95% CI, 1.035-3.000, P = .03) as predictors of late mortality. Median follow-up was 13.7 years, and 30-day mortality was 1.5%. Nineteen patients underwent 24 aortic reinterventions including aortic arch reconstruction (n = 4), descending thoracic aorta aneurysm repair (n = 8), thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair (n = 11), and pseudoaneurysm repair (n = 1). Rate of reintervention on the aorta was 3.9% (95% CI, 1.9%-8.1%), 7.1% (95% CI, 4.1%-12.3%), 12.8% (95% CI, 8.3%-19.6%), and 12.8% (95% CI, 8.3%-19.6%) at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively.

Conclusions

Surgery in patients with GCA can be performed with acceptable early and late outcomes. Advancing age, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, and cerebrovascular disease are risk factors for worse survival. Postoperative surveillance is important as need for aortic reintervention is not uncommon.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
近主动脉巨细胞性动脉炎的外科治疗。
目的:巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)可能表现为主动脉近端病变,需要手术干预。我们介绍了我们在主动脉近端病变患者的GCA手术治疗方面的经验。方法:1993年1月至2020年5月,对184例接受心脏手术后经组织病理学诊断为GCA的成人患者进行分析。用Kaplan-Meier法估计生存率。再手术率是用考虑竞争死亡风险的累积发生率估计的。结果:最常见的手术指征是升主动脉瘤(n = 179,占97.3%)。中风6例(3.3%),肺炎8例(4.4%),透析3例(1.6%)。多变量分析发现高龄(风险比[HR], 1.054;95%可信区间[CI], 1.026-1.082, P = 0.04),外周血管疾病(HR, 2.229;95% CI, 1.458-3.624, P = .03)作为晚期死亡率的预测因子。中位随访时间为13.7年,30天死亡率为1.5%。19例患者接受了24次主动脉再干预,包括主动脉弓重建(n = 4)、胸降主动脉动脉瘤修复(n = 8)、胸腹主动脉瘤修复(n = 11)和假性动脉瘤修复(n = 1)。在1、5、10和15年,主动脉再干预率分别为3.9% (95% CI, 1.9%-8.1%)、7.1% (95% CI, 4.1%-12.3%)、12.8% (95% CI, 8.3%-19.6%)和12.8% (95% CI, 8.3%-19.6%)。结论:GCA患者的手术治疗可获得可接受的早期和晚期预后。高龄、心力衰竭、外周血管疾病和脑血管疾病是降低生存率的危险因素。术后监测是重要的,因为需要主动脉再介入治疗并不罕见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Total aortic arch replacement versus proximal aortic repair for acute type a aortic dissection: A single-center 30-year experience External validation of the German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A score in patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection Distal anastomotic new entry tears and aortic remodeling following type A dissection repair: A systematic review Aortic valve repair in a middle-income country: Exceptional outcomes and mid-term results Tricuspid valve replacement with bioprostheses: Which type fits best?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1