Validation of the inadequate delivery of oxygen index in an adult cardiovascular intensive care unit

Heather Holman BS , Dimitar Baronov PhD , Jeff McMurray MD , Arman Kilic MD , Marc Katz MD , Sanford Zeigler MD
{"title":"Validation of the inadequate delivery of oxygen index in an adult cardiovascular intensive care unit","authors":"Heather Holman BS ,&nbsp;Dimitar Baronov PhD ,&nbsp;Jeff McMurray MD ,&nbsp;Arman Kilic MD ,&nbsp;Marc Katz MD ,&nbsp;Sanford Zeigler MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Machine learning (ML) may allow for improved discernment of hemodynamics and oxygen delivery compared to standard invasive monitoring. We hypothesized that an ML algorithm could predict impaired delivery of oxygen (IDO<sub>2</sub>) with comparable discrimination to invasive mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO<sub>2</sub>) measurement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 230 patients not on mechanical circulatory support (MCS) managed with a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) were identified from 1012 patients admitted to a single cardiovascular intensive care unit (CVICU) between April 2021 and January 2022. Physiologic data were collected prospectively by the data analytics engine. Inadequate delivery of oxygen (IDO<sub>2</sub>) was defined as SvO<sub>2</sub> ≤50%. Fifty-four patients were used to train the model, which was then validated in 176 patients. Three simulated monitoring situations were constructed by downsampling the physiologic data set to exclude all SvO<sub>2</sub> sources (scenario A); all PAC data but allowing for SvO<sub>2</sub> values (scenario B); and all PAC data, including SvO<sub>2</sub> and cardiac index (CI) (scenario C). The ML platform then calculated the likelihood of IDO<sub>2</sub> for rolling 30-minute intervals and compared these values against the gold standard SvO<sub>2</sub> values using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to establish discriminatory power.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1047 laboratory-validated SvO<sub>2</sub> values were collected for the validation group. The area under the ROC curve for the IDO<sub>2</sub> index was 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.91) with the full data set. When blinded to all PAC and SvO<sub>2</sub> sources, the AUC was 0.78 (95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.81).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The IDO<sub>2</sub> index is capable of detecting SvO<sub>2</sub> ≤50% with good discriminatory function in non-MCS CVICU patients in a variety of monitoring situations. Further investigation of IDO<sub>2</sub> detection and clinical endpoints is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"22 ","pages":"Pages 354-361"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704597/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273624002547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Machine learning (ML) may allow for improved discernment of hemodynamics and oxygen delivery compared to standard invasive monitoring. We hypothesized that an ML algorithm could predict impaired delivery of oxygen (IDO2) with comparable discrimination to invasive mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) measurement.

Methods

A total of 230 patients not on mechanical circulatory support (MCS) managed with a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) were identified from 1012 patients admitted to a single cardiovascular intensive care unit (CVICU) between April 2021 and January 2022. Physiologic data were collected prospectively by the data analytics engine. Inadequate delivery of oxygen (IDO2) was defined as SvO2 ≤50%. Fifty-four patients were used to train the model, which was then validated in 176 patients. Three simulated monitoring situations were constructed by downsampling the physiologic data set to exclude all SvO2 sources (scenario A); all PAC data but allowing for SvO2 values (scenario B); and all PAC data, including SvO2 and cardiac index (CI) (scenario C). The ML platform then calculated the likelihood of IDO2 for rolling 30-minute intervals and compared these values against the gold standard SvO2 values using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to establish discriminatory power.

Results

A total of 1047 laboratory-validated SvO2 values were collected for the validation group. The area under the ROC curve for the IDO2 index was 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.91) with the full data set. When blinded to all PAC and SvO2 sources, the AUC was 0.78 (95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.81).

Conclusions

The IDO2 index is capable of detecting SvO2 ≤50% with good discriminatory function in non-MCS CVICU patients in a variety of monitoring situations. Further investigation of IDO2 detection and clinical endpoints is needed.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人心血管重症监护病房氧指数输送不足的验证。
目的:与标准的有创监测相比,机器学习(ML)可以改善血液动力学和氧气输送的识别。我们假设ML算法可以预测氧气输送受损(IDO2),与有创性混合静脉氧饱和度(SvO2)测量具有相当的区别。方法:从2021年4月至2022年1月间入住单一心血管重症监护病房(CVICU)的1012名患者中,共筛选出230名未使用肺动脉导管(PAC)管理的机械循环支持(MCS)患者。通过数据分析引擎前瞻性地收集生理数据。供氧不足(IDO2)定义为SvO2≤50%。54名患者被用来训练模型,然后在176名患者中进行验证。通过对生理数据集进行降采样以排除所有SvO2源(场景A),构建了三种模拟监测情景;所有PAC数据,但允许SvO2值(方案B);以及所有PAC数据,包括SvO2和心脏指数(CI)(场景C)。然后,ML平台计算滚动30分钟间隔内IDO2的可能性,并使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析将这些值与金标准SvO2值进行比较,以建立区分力。结果:验证组共收集实验室验证的SvO2值1047个。完整数据集的IDO2指数的ROC曲线下面积为0.89(95%可信区间为0.87-0.91)。当对所有PAC和SvO2源进行盲测时,AUC为0.78(95%置信区间为0.75-0.81)。结论:在多种监测情况下,IDO2指数均能检测出非mcs CVICU患者SvO2≤50%,具有良好的判别功能。需要进一步研究IDO2检测和临床终点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Total aortic arch replacement versus proximal aortic repair for acute type a aortic dissection: A single-center 30-year experience External validation of the German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A score in patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection Distal anastomotic new entry tears and aortic remodeling following type A dissection repair: A systematic review Aortic valve repair in a middle-income country: Exceptional outcomes and mid-term results Tricuspid valve replacement with bioprostheses: Which type fits best?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1