Patient Perceptions of Pessaries for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.) Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001630
Brittany L Roberts, Lauren Marici, Ellen Villafuerte, Bradley E Jacobs, Gillian F Wolff, Rebecca G Rogers, Jeanne Ann Dahl, Erin C Deverdis
{"title":"Patient Perceptions of Pessaries for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.","authors":"Brittany L Roberts, Lauren Marici, Ellen Villafuerte, Bradley E Jacobs, Gillian F Wolff, Rebecca G Rogers, Jeanne Ann Dahl, Erin C Deverdis","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>A vaginal pessary is a highly effective treatment for patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Patient views of pessaries and how their beliefs affect whether they choose pessary treatment is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective of this study was to describe the knowledge, understanding, and patient concerns regarding pessary use for POP management.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We performed a qualitative study of women presenting with POP who were counseled about pessary use at their initial urogynecology visit. Participants completed interviews, which were recorded, de-identified, and transcribed. Transcriptions were coded for major themes by 2 independent researchers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty patients with an average age of 63 ± 8.5 years participated. Most identified as sexually active (60%) and the majority had a high school education or less (80%). Thematic saturation was reached with themes of \"Failure\", \"Convenience,\" \"Self-Image,\" \"Sexual Relations,\" \"Cleanliness/Hygiene,\" \"Physical Barriers,\" \"Knowledge Deficits,\" and \"Discomfort.\" Many patients not only viewed a pessary as a less invasive alternative to surgery but also considered it a temporary treatment. Many patients disliked the idea of having a \"foreign body\" in place and felt it may affect their hygiene. Although most patients believed it would alleviate their POP symptoms, many had concerns about sexual intercourse, discomfort, and fear that it may fall out. Most participants who were not sexually active thought a pessary would increase their sexual confidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient opinions about pessaries are often negative with preconceived notions surrounding utilization. Focused counseling addressing concerns and fears may improve a patient's comfort with a pessary as their choice of treatment modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: A vaginal pessary is a highly effective treatment for patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Patient views of pessaries and how their beliefs affect whether they choose pessary treatment is unknown.

Objective: Our objective of this study was to describe the knowledge, understanding, and patient concerns regarding pessary use for POP management.

Study design: We performed a qualitative study of women presenting with POP who were counseled about pessary use at their initial urogynecology visit. Participants completed interviews, which were recorded, de-identified, and transcribed. Transcriptions were coded for major themes by 2 independent researchers.

Results: Twenty patients with an average age of 63 ± 8.5 years participated. Most identified as sexually active (60%) and the majority had a high school education or less (80%). Thematic saturation was reached with themes of "Failure", "Convenience," "Self-Image," "Sexual Relations," "Cleanliness/Hygiene," "Physical Barriers," "Knowledge Deficits," and "Discomfort." Many patients not only viewed a pessary as a less invasive alternative to surgery but also considered it a temporary treatment. Many patients disliked the idea of having a "foreign body" in place and felt it may affect their hygiene. Although most patients believed it would alleviate their POP symptoms, many had concerns about sexual intercourse, discomfort, and fear that it may fall out. Most participants who were not sexually active thought a pessary would increase their sexual confidence.

Conclusions: Patient opinions about pessaries are often negative with preconceived notions surrounding utilization. Focused counseling addressing concerns and fears may improve a patient's comfort with a pessary as their choice of treatment modality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
盆腔器官脱垂患者对子宫托的感知。
重要性:阴道托是一种非常有效的治疗盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的患者。患者对子宫托的看法以及他们的信念如何影响他们是否选择子宫托治疗是未知的。目的:我们本研究的目的是描述关于必要使用POP管理的知识、理解和患者的担忧。研究设计:我们对患有POP的女性进行了定性研究,这些女性在最初的泌尿妇科就诊时被告知使用子宫托。参与者完成访谈,这些访谈被记录下来,去识别,并转录。转录是由两个独立的研究人员编码的主要主题。结果:患者20例,平均年龄63±8.5岁。大多数人被认定为性活跃(60%),大多数人只受过高中教育或更少(80%)。“失败”、“方便”、“自我形象”、“性关系”、“清洁/卫生”、“物理障碍”、“知识缺陷”和“不适”等主题达到了主题饱和。许多患者不仅认为子宫托是一种比手术侵入性更小的选择,而且认为它是一种临时治疗方法。许多患者不喜欢“异物”的想法,认为这可能会影响他们的卫生。虽然大多数患者相信它会减轻他们的POP症状,但许多人担心性交,不适,并担心它可能会脱落。大多数性不活跃的参与者认为子宫托会增加他们的性信心。结论:患者对托托的看法往往是负面的,并对其使用有先入为主的观念。集中咨询解决问题和恐惧可能会提高病人的舒适度与子宫托作为他们选择的治疗方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adverse Events Associated With Female External Urinary Collection Devices. Tamsulosin to Prevent Urinary Retention After Vaginal Urogynecologic Surgery. The Effect of Concomitant Hysterectomy Route on Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Outcomes. Urogynecology Research Is Underrepresented in Top Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals. Treatment Crossover Following Advanced Therapy for Overactive Bladder Syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1