Vahid Kiarad, Feroze Mahmood, Mona Hedayat, Rayaan Yunus, Alina Nicoara, David Liu, Louis Chu, Vankatachalam Senthilnathan, Masashi Kai, Kamal Khabbaz
{"title":"Intraoperative right ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume loop analysis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A proof-of-concept methodology.","authors":"Vahid Kiarad, Feroze Mahmood, Mona Hedayat, Rayaan Yunus, Alina Nicoara, David Liu, Louis Chu, Vankatachalam Senthilnathan, Masashi Kai, Kamal Khabbaz","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2024.09.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perioperative right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in cardiac surgery patients. This study aimed to demonstrate proof of concept in generating intraoperative RV pressure-volume (PV) loops and conducting an end-systolic PV relationship (ESPVR) analysis using data obtained from routinely used intraoperative monitors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with the placement of a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) between May 2023 and March 2024 were included prospectively. The PV loops were generated using 3-dimensional echocardiographic RV volume data and continuous RV pressure data obtained from a PAC. The volume-time and pressure-time curves were digitized using the semiautomatic WebPlotDigitizer program and synchronized to reconstruct an RV PV loop and analyze ESPVR using the previously validated single-beat method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperative RV PV loops were generated for 25 patients, including 17 patients with preserved RV systolic function (group 1) and 8 patients with reduced systolic function (group 2). Mean E<sub>es</sub>, E<sub>a</sub>, and E<sub>es</sub>/E<sub>a</sub> ratio were 0.63 ± 0.25 mm Hg/mL, 0.60 ± 0.23 mm Hg/mL, and 1.0 8 ± 0.31 mm Hg/mL, respectively, by the P<sub>max</sub> method and 0.56 ± 0.32 mm Hg/mL, 0.60 ± 0.23 mm Hg/mL, and 0.91 ± 0.21 mm Hg/mL, respectively, by the V<sub>0</sub> method. Group 1 had a significantly higher E<sub>es</sub> compared to group 2 regardless of the calculation method and a larger E<sub>es</sub>/E<sub>a</sub> ratio calculated by the V<sub>0</sub> method.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is clinically feasible to derive RV PV loops from routine hemodynamic and echocardiographic data. With further validation and technological support, this can be a potential real-time intraoperative RV function monitoring tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"22 ","pages":"225-234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2024.09.020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Perioperative right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in cardiac surgery patients. This study aimed to demonstrate proof of concept in generating intraoperative RV pressure-volume (PV) loops and conducting an end-systolic PV relationship (ESPVR) analysis using data obtained from routinely used intraoperative monitors.
Methods: Adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with the placement of a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) between May 2023 and March 2024 were included prospectively. The PV loops were generated using 3-dimensional echocardiographic RV volume data and continuous RV pressure data obtained from a PAC. The volume-time and pressure-time curves were digitized using the semiautomatic WebPlotDigitizer program and synchronized to reconstruct an RV PV loop and analyze ESPVR using the previously validated single-beat method.
Results: Intraoperative RV PV loops were generated for 25 patients, including 17 patients with preserved RV systolic function (group 1) and 8 patients with reduced systolic function (group 2). Mean Ees, Ea, and Ees/Ea ratio were 0.63 ± 0.25 mm Hg/mL, 0.60 ± 0.23 mm Hg/mL, and 1.0 8 ± 0.31 mm Hg/mL, respectively, by the Pmax method and 0.56 ± 0.32 mm Hg/mL, 0.60 ± 0.23 mm Hg/mL, and 0.91 ± 0.21 mm Hg/mL, respectively, by the V0 method. Group 1 had a significantly higher Ees compared to group 2 regardless of the calculation method and a larger Ees/Ea ratio calculated by the V0 method.
Conclusions: It is clinically feasible to derive RV PV loops from routine hemodynamic and echocardiographic data. With further validation and technological support, this can be a potential real-time intraoperative RV function monitoring tool.
背景:围手术期右心室功能障碍与心脏手术患者发病率和死亡率增加有关。本研究旨在验证术中心室压力-容积(PV)循环产生的概念,并利用术中常规使用的监护仪获得的数据进行收缩期末期PV关系(ESPVR)分析。方法:前瞻性纳入2023年5月至2024年3月期间接受心脏手术并放置肺动脉导管(PAC)的成年患者。利用三维超声心动图右心室容积数据和PAC获得的连续右心室压力数据生成PV环路。使用半自动WebPlotDigitizer程序对容积时间和压力时间曲线进行数字化,并同步重建右心室PV环路,并使用先前验证的单拍方法分析ESPVR。结果:术中房车PV循环生成25例,其中17患者保存房车收缩功能(组1)收缩功能下降患者和8(组2)。意思是ee, Ea和ee / Ea比率分别为0.63±0.25 mm Hg / mL, 0.60±0.23 mm Hg /毫升,8和1.0±0.31毫米汞柱/ mL,分别由Pmax方法和0.56±0.32 mm Hg /毫升,0.60±0.23 mm Hg /毫升,和0.91±0.21毫米汞柱/ mL,分别由V0方法。无论采用何种计算方法,1组的Ees均显著高于2组,且采用V0法计算的Ees/Ea比值较大。结论:从常规血流动力学和超声心动图数据推断右室PV袢在临床上是可行的。在进一步的验证和技术支持下,这可能成为一种潜在的术中心室功能实时监测工具。