Transitioning to Opioid-free Anesthesia for Pediatric Supracondylar Fracture Repairs: A Patient Safety Report.

IF 1.2 Q3 PEDIATRICS Pediatric quality & safety Pub Date : 2025-01-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000777
Laurence O Henson, Jennifer Chiem, Emmanuella Joseph, Fiona Patrao, Daniel King-Wai Low
{"title":"Transitioning to Opioid-free Anesthesia for Pediatric Supracondylar Fracture Repairs: A Patient Safety Report.","authors":"Laurence O Henson, Jennifer Chiem, Emmanuella Joseph, Fiona Patrao, Daniel King-Wai Low","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Supracondylar fractures are among the most common injuries in the pediatric population. Recently, there has been increased interest in developing opioid-free anesthetic protocols that achieve these same goals without the risks associated with opioid use, such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), delayed discharges, and respiratory depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seattle Children's Hospital implemented opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) for pediatric supracondylar fracture repairs in January 2021. This patient safety report compares the clinical outcomes of these patients to those who received intraoperative opioids. Clinical effectiveness was measured using the maximum pain scores in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), postoperative opioid rescue rates in PACU and PONV rescue rate. PACU length of stay (LOS) was chosen as a clinical balancing measure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The opioid group (n = 464) had a mean maximum pain score of 3.39 compared with the OFA group (n = 816), which had a mean maximum of 3.70. The PACU IV opioid rescue rate for the opioid group was 38.82%, whereas the OFA group was 38.73%. The opioid group had a PONV rescue rate of 1.53%, compared with 0.23% in the OFA group. Mean LOS in the PACU was 79 minutes for the opioid group and 86 minutes for the OFA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The shift to OFA for intraoperative management of patients' supracondylar fracture repair resulted in similar postoperative analgesic outcomes when compared with an opioid-based approach, with a reduced PONV rate and minimal increase in LOS. Transitioning to OFA provided a safe and effective protocol for supracondylar repairs.</p>","PeriodicalId":74412,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric quality & safety","volume":"10 1","pages":"e777"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11703429/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric quality & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Supracondylar fractures are among the most common injuries in the pediatric population. Recently, there has been increased interest in developing opioid-free anesthetic protocols that achieve these same goals without the risks associated with opioid use, such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), delayed discharges, and respiratory depression.

Methods: Seattle Children's Hospital implemented opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) for pediatric supracondylar fracture repairs in January 2021. This patient safety report compares the clinical outcomes of these patients to those who received intraoperative opioids. Clinical effectiveness was measured using the maximum pain scores in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), postoperative opioid rescue rates in PACU and PONV rescue rate. PACU length of stay (LOS) was chosen as a clinical balancing measure.

Results: The opioid group (n = 464) had a mean maximum pain score of 3.39 compared with the OFA group (n = 816), which had a mean maximum of 3.70. The PACU IV opioid rescue rate for the opioid group was 38.82%, whereas the OFA group was 38.73%. The opioid group had a PONV rescue rate of 1.53%, compared with 0.23% in the OFA group. Mean LOS in the PACU was 79 minutes for the opioid group and 86 minutes for the OFA group.

Conclusions: The shift to OFA for intraoperative management of patients' supracondylar fracture repair resulted in similar postoperative analgesic outcomes when compared with an opioid-based approach, with a reduced PONV rate and minimal increase in LOS. Transitioning to OFA provided a safe and effective protocol for supracondylar repairs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
过渡到无阿片类药物麻醉用于儿童髁上骨折修复:患者安全报告。
简介:髁上骨折是儿科人群中最常见的损伤之一。最近,人们对开发无阿片类药物麻醉方案越来越感兴趣,这些方案可以实现相同的目标,而不会产生与阿片类药物使用相关的风险,如术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)、延迟出院和呼吸抑制。方法:西雅图儿童医院于2021年1月实施无阿片类麻醉(OFA)用于儿童髁上骨折修复。本患者安全报告比较了这些患者与术中使用阿片类药物的患者的临床结果。采用麻醉后护理单元(PACU)的最大疼痛评分、PACU的术后阿片类药物抢救率和PONV抢救率来衡量临床疗效。选择PACU住院时间(LOS)作为临床平衡指标。结果:阿片类药物组(n = 464)的平均最大疼痛评分为3.39,OFA组(n = 816)的平均最大疼痛评分为3.70。阿片类药物组PACU IV阿片类药物抢救率为38.82%,OFA组为38.73%。阿片类药物组PONV抢救率为1.53%,OFA组为0.23%。阿片类药物组PACU的平均LOS为79分钟,OFA组为86分钟。结论:与基于阿片类药物的入路相比,术中使用OFA治疗髁上骨折患者的术后镇痛效果相似,PONV率降低,LOS增加最小。过渡到OFA为髁上修复提供了安全有效的方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Improving Evidenced-based Outpatient Order Set Utilization in the Gastrointestinal Division of a Large Pediatric Health System. Leveraging Quality Improvement Tools to Improve Administration of First-line Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Patients Labeled as Penicillin Allergic. Reducing Employee Injuries from Aggressive Patient Behavior at Children's Hospital by Implementing a Behavioral Response Team. Pediatric Health Assessment Tracker: A Quality Improvement Initiative to Obtain Weights Consistently and Appropriately in a Tertiary Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Decreasing Unnecessary Resource Utilization for New-onset, Unprovoked, Afebrile Seizure in the Emergency Department.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1