Evaluating the implementation of online research training and mentorship among early-career family physicians in sub-Saharan Africa.

Darcelle Schouw, Robert Mash, Pius Ameh, Bolatito B Fatusin, Stephen Engmann
{"title":"Evaluating the implementation of online research training and mentorship among early-career family physicians in sub-Saharan Africa.","authors":"Darcelle Schouw, Robert Mash, Pius Ameh, Bolatito B Fatusin, Stephen Engmann","doi":"10.1017/S146342362400063X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research is needed to improve the performance of primary health care. In Africa, few family physicians conduct research, and therefore an online research training and mentorship programme was developed to build research capacity amongst novice and early career researchers.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the implementation of the AfriWon Research Collaborative (ARC) training and e-mentorship programme in sub-Saharan Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 10-module online curriculum was supported by peer and faculty e-mentorship, to mentor participants in writing a research protocol. A convergent mixed methods study combined quantitative and qualitative data to evaluate nine implementation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Fifty-three participants (20 mentees, 19 peer mentors, and 14 faculty mentors), mostly male (70%), participated in the ARC online programme. The programme was seen as an acceptable and appropriate initiative. Mentees were mostly postgraduate students from African countries. Faculty mentors were mostly experienced researchers from outside of Africa. There were issues with team selection, orientation, communication, and role clarification. Only 35% of the mentees completed the programme. Alignment of mentoring in teams and engagement with the online learning materials was an issue. Costs were relatively modest and dependent on donor funds.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite many challenges, the majority of participants supported the sustainability of the programme. The evaluation highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the ARC programme and e-mentoring. The ARC working group needed to ensure better organization and leadership of the teams. Going forward the programme should focus more on developing peer mentors and local supervisory capacity as well as the mentees.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"26 ","pages":"e3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11735121/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S146342362400063X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research is needed to improve the performance of primary health care. In Africa, few family physicians conduct research, and therefore an online research training and mentorship programme was developed to build research capacity amongst novice and early career researchers.

Aim: To evaluate the implementation of the AfriWon Research Collaborative (ARC) training and e-mentorship programme in sub-Saharan Africa.

Methods: A 10-module online curriculum was supported by peer and faculty e-mentorship, to mentor participants in writing a research protocol. A convergent mixed methods study combined quantitative and qualitative data to evaluate nine implementation outcomes.

Findings: Fifty-three participants (20 mentees, 19 peer mentors, and 14 faculty mentors), mostly male (70%), participated in the ARC online programme. The programme was seen as an acceptable and appropriate initiative. Mentees were mostly postgraduate students from African countries. Faculty mentors were mostly experienced researchers from outside of Africa. There were issues with team selection, orientation, communication, and role clarification. Only 35% of the mentees completed the programme. Alignment of mentoring in teams and engagement with the online learning materials was an issue. Costs were relatively modest and dependent on donor funds.

Conclusion: Despite many challenges, the majority of participants supported the sustainability of the programme. The evaluation highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the ARC programme and e-mentoring. The ARC working group needed to ensure better organization and leadership of the teams. Going forward the programme should focus more on developing peer mentors and local supervisory capacity as well as the mentees.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估撒哈拉以南非洲早期职业家庭医生在线研究培训和指导的实施情况。
背景:需要进行研究以提高初级卫生保健的绩效。在非洲,很少有家庭医生进行研究,因此制定了一个在线研究培训和指导方案,以在新手和早期职业研究人员中建立研究能力。目的:评估非洲研究合作(ARC)培训和电子指导计划在撒哈拉以南非洲的实施情况。方法:一个10模块的在线课程由同行和教师电子指导支持,指导参与者撰写研究方案。一项融合混合方法研究结合定量和定性数据来评估九项实施结果。研究结果:53名参与者(20名学员、19名同侪导师和14名教师导师)参加了ARC在线项目,其中大部分为男性(70%)。该方案被认为是一项可接受和适当的倡议。学员多为来自非洲国家的研究生。教师导师大多是来自非洲以外的有经验的研究人员。在团队选择、定位、沟通和角色澄清方面存在问题。只有35%的学员完成了课程。在团队中进行指导和参与在线学习材料是一个问题。费用相对不大,并依赖于捐助资金。结论:尽管面临许多挑战,大多数与会者支持方案的可持续性。评估突出了ARC规划和电子指导的优缺点。ARC工作组需要确保更好地组织和领导各小组。今后该方案应更多地侧重于发展同侪导师和地方监督能力以及学员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Novel educational strategies to improve the telemedicine clinical skills of medical students. Perceptions of primary care services among Afro-Peruvians in Lima, Peru. Committed leadership: a prerequisite for successful implementation of recovery during the workday. The incentivized drug information services among community pharmacists: a multi-centre cross-sectional study in Indonesia. Evaluation of an updated educational intervention on nutritional care to prevent undernutrition among older adults in primary health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1