A longitudinal examination of factors predicting maternal permissiveness toward underage student drinking across the first three years of college

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Addictive behaviors Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108244
Oliver J. Hatch , Bradley M. Trager , Joseph W. LaBrie , Clayton Neighbors , Kimberly A. Mallett , Rob Turrisi
{"title":"A longitudinal examination of factors predicting maternal permissiveness toward underage student drinking across the first three years of college","authors":"Oliver J. Hatch ,&nbsp;Bradley M. Trager ,&nbsp;Joseph W. LaBrie ,&nbsp;Clayton Neighbors ,&nbsp;Kimberly A. Mallett ,&nbsp;Rob Turrisi","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Parental permissiveness of drinking is a reliable predictor of college drinking, but there is little known about factors that predict such permissiveness. This study seeks to examine factors that predict two potentially different facets of permissiveness: perceived general approval of alcohol use and perceived drinking limits. Additionally, we explored how these facets mediate the relationship between the predictors of permissiveness and subsequent college drinking and related consequences. First-year college students (<em>N</em> = 1,172) from three large U.S. universities participated in a three-year longitudinal study (surveys were approximately 1 year apart). The students reported demographic information (i.e., birth sex, race, ethnicity), perceived injunctive peer norms, drinking outcomes (i.e., peak, heavy episodic drinking, and consequences), and perceived maternal behaviors (i.e., modeling alcohol use, monitoring, alcohol communication) and attitudes toward drinking (i.e., general approval and drinking limits). Results indicated that being White (compared to Asian and Black) predicted higher perceived maternal general approval of alcohol use and higher perceived maternal drinking limits during students’ second year in college. And, perceived maternal drinking limits, but not general approval, assessed during students’ second year predicted all three drinking outcomes during the students’ third year. This study supports previous research showing the impact of parental permissiveness, especially drinking limits, on college drinking and highlights the role of race as a predictor of parental permissiveness. Moreover, our findings support general approval and drinking limits as distinct facets that reflect different dimensions of parental permissiveness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7155,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 108244"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460324002934","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Parental permissiveness of drinking is a reliable predictor of college drinking, but there is little known about factors that predict such permissiveness. This study seeks to examine factors that predict two potentially different facets of permissiveness: perceived general approval of alcohol use and perceived drinking limits. Additionally, we explored how these facets mediate the relationship between the predictors of permissiveness and subsequent college drinking and related consequences. First-year college students (N = 1,172) from three large U.S. universities participated in a three-year longitudinal study (surveys were approximately 1 year apart). The students reported demographic information (i.e., birth sex, race, ethnicity), perceived injunctive peer norms, drinking outcomes (i.e., peak, heavy episodic drinking, and consequences), and perceived maternal behaviors (i.e., modeling alcohol use, monitoring, alcohol communication) and attitudes toward drinking (i.e., general approval and drinking limits). Results indicated that being White (compared to Asian and Black) predicted higher perceived maternal general approval of alcohol use and higher perceived maternal drinking limits during students’ second year in college. And, perceived maternal drinking limits, but not general approval, assessed during students’ second year predicted all three drinking outcomes during the students’ third year. This study supports previous research showing the impact of parental permissiveness, especially drinking limits, on college drinking and highlights the role of race as a predictor of parental permissiveness. Moreover, our findings support general approval and drinking limits as distinct facets that reflect different dimensions of parental permissiveness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项预测母亲在大学前三年对未成年学生饮酒纵容程度的纵向研究。
父母对饮酒的放纵是大学生饮酒的可靠预测因素,但预测这种放纵的因素却鲜为人知。本研究旨在研究预测放纵性的两个潜在不同方面的因素:对酒精使用的普遍认可和对饮酒限制的认知。此外,我们还探讨了这些方面是如何调节放纵与随后的大学饮酒及其相关后果之间的关系的。来自美国三所大型大学的一年级大学生(N = 1172)参与了一项为期三年的纵向研究(调查间隔大约1年)。学生报告了人口统计信息(即出生性别,种族,民族),感知到的禁令同伴规范,饮酒结果(即峰值,重度间歇性饮酒和后果),以及感知到的母亲行为(即模拟酒精使用,监测,酒精沟通)和对饮酒的态度(即一般认可和饮酒限制)。结果表明,白人(与亚洲人和黑人相比)预测,在学生大学二年级时,母亲对饮酒的普遍认可程度更高,母亲对饮酒的限制程度也更高。而且,在学生第二年评估的感知到的母亲饮酒限制,而不是普遍认可,预测了学生在第三年的所有三种饮酒结果。这项研究支持了先前的研究,表明父母的放纵,特别是饮酒限制,对大学饮酒的影响,并强调了种族作为父母放纵的预测因素的作用。此外,我们的研究结果支持一般批准和饮酒限制作为不同的方面,反映了父母许可的不同维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Addictive behaviors
Addictive behaviors 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
283
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Addictive Behaviors is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality human research on addictive behaviors and disorders since 1975. The journal accepts submissions of full-length papers and short communications on substance-related addictions such as the abuse of alcohol, drugs and nicotine, and behavioral addictions involving gambling and technology. We primarily publish behavioral and psychosocial research but our articles span the fields of psychology, sociology, psychiatry, epidemiology, social policy, medicine, pharmacology and neuroscience. While theoretical orientations are diverse, the emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. However, innovative and empirically oriented case studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry are accepted as well. Studies that clearly contribute to current knowledge of etiology, prevention, social policy or treatment are given priority. Scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are encouraged. We especially welcome multimedia papers that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings. Studies can also be submitted to Addictive Behaviors? companion title, the open access journal Addictive Behaviors Reports, which has a particular interest in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically-oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research.
期刊最新文献
Predictors of past 30-day vaping abstinence among young e-cigarette users: Machine learning analysis of a longitudinal cohort Gender-specific risk factors for gambling-related suicidal ideation: Evidence from a help-seeking population Acute effects of subjective alcohol effects and negative alcohol consequences on next-day positive alcohol expectancies Efficacy of combined nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and bupropion compared to bupropion alone for smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1