Efficacy of radiosurgery with and without angioembolization: A subgroup analysis of effectiveness in ruptured versus unruptured arteriovenous malformations - An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Surgical neurology international Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.25259/SNI_737_2024
Hamza Khan, Abdul Basit Sangah, Roua Nasir, Saad Akhtar Khan, Shazia Saleem Shaikh, Ikhlas Ahmed, Mohad Kamran Abbasi, Asma Ahmed, Dua Siddiqui, Syeda Ayesha Hussain, Naveed Zaman Akhunzada, Oswin Godfrey
{"title":"Efficacy of radiosurgery with and without angioembolization: A subgroup analysis of effectiveness in ruptured versus unruptured arteriovenous malformations - An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Hamza Khan, Abdul Basit Sangah, Roua Nasir, Saad Akhtar Khan, Shazia Saleem Shaikh, Ikhlas Ahmed, Mohad Kamran Abbasi, Asma Ahmed, Dua Siddiqui, Syeda Ayesha Hussain, Naveed Zaman Akhunzada, Oswin Godfrey","doi":"10.25259/SNI_737_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Congenital arterial defects such as cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) increase brain bleeding risk. Conservative therapy, microsurgical removal, percutaneous embolization, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), or a combination may treat this serious disease. This study compares angioembolization with SRS to SRS alone in ruptured or unruptured brain ateriovenous malformations (BAVM) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations for this study. Until September 2023, PubMed/Medline, Cochrane, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for literature. English-language studies comparing SRS alone to embolization with SRS on ruptured or non-ruptured AVMs that could not be operated on were considered. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessed research study quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results included 46 studies with a total of 7077 participants. There was a greater obliteration rate in the SRS-only group (60.4%) than in the embolization plus SRS group (49.73%). Particularly in the SRS-only group, ruptured AVMs showed a noticeably greater obliteration rate than unruptured AVMs (<i>P</i> = 0.002). However, no notable differences were found in hemorrhagic events or radiation-induced changes between the two groups; however, the SRS-only group had a slightly greater, yet not statistically significant, mortality rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data showed that ruptured brain AVMs had a much greater obliteration rate than unruptured ones, mostly due to SRS alone, without embolization. The aggregated data showed no significant changes, whereas SRS alone decreased radiation-induced alterations and hemorrhagic rates but with increased mortality. SRS alone may have a higher risk-to-reward ratio for nidus obliteration in ruptured brain AVM patients, so it should be used without embolization, although more research is needed to determine the effects of immediate and late complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":94217,"journal":{"name":"Surgical neurology international","volume":"15 ","pages":"467"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical neurology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_737_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Congenital arterial defects such as cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) increase brain bleeding risk. Conservative therapy, microsurgical removal, percutaneous embolization, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), or a combination may treat this serious disease. This study compares angioembolization with SRS to SRS alone in ruptured or unruptured brain ateriovenous malformations (BAVM) patients.

Methods: We followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations for this study. Until September 2023, PubMed/Medline, Cochrane, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for literature. English-language studies comparing SRS alone to embolization with SRS on ruptured or non-ruptured AVMs that could not be operated on were considered. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessed research study quality.

Results: Results included 46 studies with a total of 7077 participants. There was a greater obliteration rate in the SRS-only group (60.4%) than in the embolization plus SRS group (49.73%). Particularly in the SRS-only group, ruptured AVMs showed a noticeably greater obliteration rate than unruptured AVMs (P = 0.002). However, no notable differences were found in hemorrhagic events or radiation-induced changes between the two groups; however, the SRS-only group had a slightly greater, yet not statistically significant, mortality rate.

Conclusion: Our data showed that ruptured brain AVMs had a much greater obliteration rate than unruptured ones, mostly due to SRS alone, without embolization. The aggregated data showed no significant changes, whereas SRS alone decreased radiation-induced alterations and hemorrhagic rates but with increased mortality. SRS alone may have a higher risk-to-reward ratio for nidus obliteration in ruptured brain AVM patients, so it should be used without embolization, although more research is needed to determine the effects of immediate and late complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放疗伴血管栓塞和不伴血管栓塞的疗效:破裂与未破裂动静脉畸形疗效的亚组分析——一项最新的系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:先天性动脉缺陷如脑动静脉畸形(AVMs)增加脑出血的风险。保守治疗、显微手术切除、经皮栓塞、立体定向放射手术(SRS)或联合治疗可治疗这种严重疾病。本研究比较了血管栓塞联合SRS与单独SRS治疗脑动脉静脉畸形(BAVM)患者的效果。方法:我们遵循本研究系统评价和荟萃分析推荐的首选报告项目。直到2023年9月,PubMed/Medline, Cochrane和Clinicaltrials.gov检索文献。英语研究比较SRS单独与栓塞SRS对破裂或未破裂不能手术的avm。纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估了研究质量。结果:结果包括46项研究,共7077名参与者。单纯SRS组的栓塞率(60.4%)高于栓塞加SRS组(49.73%)。特别是在仅使用srs的组中,破裂的avm的闭塞率明显高于未破裂的avm (P = 0.002)。然而,两组在出血事件或辐射引起的变化方面没有显著差异;然而,仅使用srs的组的死亡率略高,但没有统计学意义。结论:我们的数据显示,脑动静脉破裂的闭塞率比未破裂的闭塞率高得多,主要是由于单纯的SRS,而不是栓塞。综合数据显示没有显著变化,而单独使用SRS降低了辐射引起的改变和出血率,但增加了死亡率。对于脑AVM破裂患者的病灶闭塞,单独使用SRS可能具有更高的风险回报比,因此不应栓塞使用SRS,尽管需要更多的研究来确定即时和晚期并发症的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intradural extramedullary tuberculoma in a case of disseminated tuberculosis: A case report. Neurosurgery for mental conditions and pain: An historical perspective on the limits of biological determinism. Neurosurgical strategy based on the type of occult spinal dysraphism in omphalocele-exstrophy-imperforate anus-spinal defects complex: A review of 10 cases. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio: A simple and accurate biomarker for the prognosis of patients with intracerebral bleeding, a study of 115 cases. Semi-sitting position and retrosigmoid approach for a large petroclival meningioma resection: 3-dimensional operative video.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1