Developing structured clinical review templates in an integrated respiratory team during COVID-19: a qualitative review.

Phyllis Murphie, Yvonne Scott, Bruce Watt, Robin Paton, Kayrine Stewart, Susan McGill, Shona Jardine, Susan Shearer, John Duncan
{"title":"Developing structured clinical review templates in an integrated respiratory team during COVID-19: a qualitative review.","authors":"Phyllis Murphie, Yvonne Scott, Bruce Watt, Robin Paton, Kayrine Stewart, Susan McGill, Shona Jardine, Susan Shearer, John Duncan","doi":"10.12968/bjon.2025.0270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In response to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in March 2020 and required adherence to infection control measures and patient and staff safety, an integrated respiratory team (IRT) developed guideline-based templates to support the team in teleconsultation reviews of their patients. Patients had been diagnosed with sleep disordered breathing, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, interstitial lung disease or had oxygen assessment needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine IRT members collaboratively developed content for the templates to assist in clinical reviews. In February 2023 semi-structured interviews were conducted and recorded with eight of the IRT members using Microsoft Teams, then thematically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Qualitative analysis revealed 13 themes. The templates were considered time-saving and advantageous in teleconsultation reviews. They supported evidence-based, structured, and consistent reviews. They were felt to uphold patient safety, supporting knowledge and skills. IRT members reported the templates had no adverse effects on autonomy, patient-professional relationships or person-centred care. They facilitated good multidisciplinary team working and communication. One interviewee reported that the templates supported the Nursing and Midwifery Council <i>Code</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The templates continue to be used across the regional service by the IRT. Their benefit has been realised beyond the pandemic. Refinements will be made as guidelines are updated. The development of these innovative templates may be of interest and value to other respiratory teams.</p>","PeriodicalId":520014,"journal":{"name":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","volume":"34 1","pages":"50-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2025.0270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In response to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in March 2020 and required adherence to infection control measures and patient and staff safety, an integrated respiratory team (IRT) developed guideline-based templates to support the team in teleconsultation reviews of their patients. Patients had been diagnosed with sleep disordered breathing, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, interstitial lung disease or had oxygen assessment needs.

Methods: Nine IRT members collaboratively developed content for the templates to assist in clinical reviews. In February 2023 semi-structured interviews were conducted and recorded with eight of the IRT members using Microsoft Teams, then thematically analysed.

Results: Qualitative analysis revealed 13 themes. The templates were considered time-saving and advantageous in teleconsultation reviews. They supported evidence-based, structured, and consistent reviews. They were felt to uphold patient safety, supporting knowledge and skills. IRT members reported the templates had no adverse effects on autonomy, patient-professional relationships or person-centred care. They facilitated good multidisciplinary team working and communication. One interviewee reported that the templates supported the Nursing and Midwifery Council Code.

Conclusion: The templates continue to be used across the regional service by the IRT. Their benefit has been realised beyond the pandemic. Refinements will be made as guidelines are updated. The development of these innovative templates may be of interest and value to other respiratory teams.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在COVID-19期间在综合呼吸系统团队中开发结构化临床回顾模板:一项定性回顾。
为了应对2020年3月的SARS-CoV-2大流行,并要求遵守感染控制措施和患者和工作人员的安全,一个呼吸道综合小组(IRT)开发了基于指南的模板,以支持该小组对患者进行远程会诊审查。患者被诊断为睡眠呼吸障碍、慢性阻塞性肺病、哮喘、肺间质性疾病或有氧气评估需求。方法:9名IRT成员共同开发模板内容,协助临床评价。在2023年2月,使用Microsoft Teams对8名IRT成员进行了半结构化访谈并进行了记录,然后进行了主题分析。结果:定性分析揭示了13个主题。这些模板被认为节省了时间,有利于远程会诊审查。他们支持基于证据的、结构化的和一致的评价。他们被认为是维护病人的安全,支持知识和技能。IRT成员报告说,模板对自主性、医患关系或以人为本的护理没有不利影响。他们促进了良好的多学科团队合作和沟通。一位受访者报告说,模板支持护理和助产委员会守则。结论:IRT继续在整个区域服务中使用模板。它们的益处已经超越了大流行病。随着指导方针的更新,将对其进行改进。这些创新模板的开发可能会引起其他呼吸系统团队的兴趣和价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A multifaceted and enjoyable career in mental health care, spanning clinical practice, research and policy development. Benefits of a diverse gut microbiome in systemic anti-cancer therapy patients. Tackling some of the NHS patient safety problems in 2025. Make nursing recruitment a priority. NHS manager regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1