Alisson Henrique Marinho PhD , Gleyce Maria dos Santos Cavalcante MS , Maria da Glória David Silva Costa MS , Amandio Aristides Rihan Geraldes PhD , Gustavo Gomes de Araujo PhD
{"title":"Caffeine Responsiveness Before and After Pilates Training in Healthy Older Adults","authors":"Alisson Henrique Marinho PhD , Gleyce Maria dos Santos Cavalcante MS , Maria da Glória David Silva Costa MS , Amandio Aristides Rihan Geraldes PhD , Gustavo Gomes de Araujo PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2024.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The study aimed to assess responsiveness to the effects of acute caffeine intake after 8 weeks of Pilates intervention in healthy older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Fifteen healthy older adults performed physical performance regarding daily practice, strength, and balance tests after ingestion of acute 5 mg/kg of caffeine or placebo before and after Pilates training.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The caffeine intake reduced, regardless of Pilates training, the time in 10-m walk test (before placebo vs caffeine, 6.48 ± 0.70 vs 6.51 ± 0.82 seconds; after placebo vs caffeine, 5.84 ± 0.70 vs 5.48 ± 0.61 seconds; <em>P</em> = .008; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.404) and timed up and go test (before placebo vs caffeine, 26.30 ± 1.82 vs 24.37 ± 2.12 seconds; after placebo vs caffeine, 22.96 ± 2.36 vs 22.49 ± 2.27 seconds; <em>P</em> = .002; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.517) compared with the placebo. Participants were not less responsive to caffeine intake in the 10-m walk test (ΔPre vs ΔPost, −0.33 ± 0.66 vs −0.36 ± 0.53 seconds; <em>P</em> = .888), but they were less responsive for the timed up and go test (ΔPre vs ΔPost, −1.92 ± 2.06 vs −0.47 ± 1.15 seconds; <em>P</em> = 0.030) after Pilates intervention. There were no differences for the sit-to-stand test, rising from the floor, dress and undress T-shirt, handgrip strength, and balance variables.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although the caffeine improved on the 10-m walk test and timed up and go test performance, healthy older adults were less responsive to caffeine after Pilates training only for performance on the timed up and go test.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":"23 4","pages":"Pages 178-185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370724000178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
The study aimed to assess responsiveness to the effects of acute caffeine intake after 8 weeks of Pilates intervention in healthy older adults.
Methods
Fifteen healthy older adults performed physical performance regarding daily practice, strength, and balance tests after ingestion of acute 5 mg/kg of caffeine or placebo before and after Pilates training.
Results
The caffeine intake reduced, regardless of Pilates training, the time in 10-m walk test (before placebo vs caffeine, 6.48 ± 0.70 vs 6.51 ± 0.82 seconds; after placebo vs caffeine, 5.84 ± 0.70 vs 5.48 ± 0.61 seconds; P = .008; ηp2 = 0.404) and timed up and go test (before placebo vs caffeine, 26.30 ± 1.82 vs 24.37 ± 2.12 seconds; after placebo vs caffeine, 22.96 ± 2.36 vs 22.49 ± 2.27 seconds; P = .002; ηp2 = 0.517) compared with the placebo. Participants were not less responsive to caffeine intake in the 10-m walk test (ΔPre vs ΔPost, −0.33 ± 0.66 vs −0.36 ± 0.53 seconds; P = .888), but they were less responsive for the timed up and go test (ΔPre vs ΔPost, −1.92 ± 2.06 vs −0.47 ± 1.15 seconds; P = 0.030) after Pilates intervention. There were no differences for the sit-to-stand test, rising from the floor, dress and undress T-shirt, handgrip strength, and balance variables.
Conclusion
Although the caffeine improved on the 10-m walk test and timed up and go test performance, healthy older adults were less responsive to caffeine after Pilates training only for performance on the timed up and go test.
目的:本研究旨在评估健康老年人在8周的普拉提干预后对急性咖啡因摄入影响的反应性。方法:15名健康老年人在普拉提训练前后摄入急性5mg /kg咖啡因或安慰剂后,进行日常练习、力量和平衡测试。结果:无论普拉提训练如何,咖啡因摄入量减少,10米步行测试时间(安慰剂vs咖啡因前,6.48±0.70 vs 6.51±0.82秒;安慰剂vs咖啡因分别为5.84±0.70 vs 5.48±0.61秒;P = 0.008;ηp 2 = 0.404)和up and go测试(安慰剂组vs咖啡因组,26.30±1.82 vs 24.37±2.12秒;安慰剂vs咖啡因分别为22.96±2.36 vs 22.49±2.27秒;P = .002;ηp 2 = 0.517)。在10米步行测试中,参与者对咖啡因摄入的反应并没有降低(ΔPre vs ΔPost, -0.33±0.66 vs -0.36±0.53秒;P = .888),但在计时起走测试中反应较差(ΔPre vs ΔPost, -1.92±2.06 vs -0.47±1.15秒;P = 0.030)。坐立测试、从地板上站起来、穿t恤和不穿t恤、握力和平衡变量没有差异。结论:虽然咖啡因改善了10米步行测试和计时和走测试的表现,但健康的老年人在普拉提训练后对咖啡因的反应较弱,仅对计时和走测试的表现。