Caffeine Responsiveness Before and After Pilates Training in Healthy Older Adults

Alisson Henrique Marinho PhD , Gleyce Maria dos Santos Cavalcante MS , Maria da Glória David Silva Costa MS , Amandio Aristides Rihan Geraldes PhD , Gustavo Gomes de Araujo PhD
{"title":"Caffeine Responsiveness Before and After Pilates Training in Healthy Older Adults","authors":"Alisson Henrique Marinho PhD ,&nbsp;Gleyce Maria dos Santos Cavalcante MS ,&nbsp;Maria da Glória David Silva Costa MS ,&nbsp;Amandio Aristides Rihan Geraldes PhD ,&nbsp;Gustavo Gomes de Araujo PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2024.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The study aimed to assess responsiveness to the effects of acute caffeine intake after 8 weeks of Pilates intervention in healthy older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Fifteen healthy older adults performed physical performance regarding daily practice, strength, and balance tests after ingestion of acute 5 mg/kg of caffeine or placebo before and after Pilates training.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The caffeine intake reduced, regardless of Pilates training, the time in 10-m walk test (before placebo vs caffeine, 6.48 ± 0.70 vs 6.51 ± 0.82 seconds; after placebo vs caffeine, 5.84 ± 0.70 vs 5.48 ± 0.61 seconds; <em>P</em> = .008; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.404) and timed up and go test (before placebo vs caffeine, 26.30 ± 1.82 vs 24.37 ± 2.12 seconds; after placebo vs caffeine, 22.96 ± 2.36 vs 22.49 ± 2.27 seconds; <em>P</em> = .002; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.517) compared with the placebo. Participants were not less responsive to caffeine intake in the 10-m walk test (ΔPre vs ΔPost, −0.33 ± 0.66 vs −0.36 ± 0.53 seconds; <em>P</em> = .888), but they were less responsive for the timed up and go test (ΔPre vs ΔPost, −1.92 ± 2.06 vs −0.47 ± 1.15 seconds; <em>P</em> = 0.030) after Pilates intervention. There were no differences for the sit-to-stand test, rising from the floor, dress and undress T-shirt, handgrip strength, and balance variables.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although the caffeine improved on the 10-m walk test and timed up and go test performance, healthy older adults were less responsive to caffeine after Pilates training only for performance on the timed up and go test.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":"23 4","pages":"Pages 178-185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370724000178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The study aimed to assess responsiveness to the effects of acute caffeine intake after 8 weeks of Pilates intervention in healthy older adults.

Methods

Fifteen healthy older adults performed physical performance regarding daily practice, strength, and balance tests after ingestion of acute 5 mg/kg of caffeine or placebo before and after Pilates training.

Results

The caffeine intake reduced, regardless of Pilates training, the time in 10-m walk test (before placebo vs caffeine, 6.48 ± 0.70 vs 6.51 ± 0.82 seconds; after placebo vs caffeine, 5.84 ± 0.70 vs 5.48 ± 0.61 seconds; P = .008; ηp2 = 0.404) and timed up and go test (before placebo vs caffeine, 26.30 ± 1.82 vs 24.37 ± 2.12 seconds; after placebo vs caffeine, 22.96 ± 2.36 vs 22.49 ± 2.27 seconds; P = .002; ηp2 = 0.517) compared with the placebo. Participants were not less responsive to caffeine intake in the 10-m walk test (ΔPre vs ΔPost, −0.33 ± 0.66 vs −0.36 ± 0.53 seconds; P = .888), but they were less responsive for the timed up and go test (ΔPre vs ΔPost, −1.92 ± 2.06 vs −0.47 ± 1.15 seconds; P = 0.030) after Pilates intervention. There were no differences for the sit-to-stand test, rising from the floor, dress and undress T-shirt, handgrip strength, and balance variables.

Conclusion

Although the caffeine improved on the 10-m walk test and timed up and go test performance, healthy older adults were less responsive to caffeine after Pilates training only for performance on the timed up and go test.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康老年人普拉提训练前后的咖啡因反应。
目的:本研究旨在评估健康老年人在8周的普拉提干预后对急性咖啡因摄入影响的反应性。方法:15名健康老年人在普拉提训练前后摄入急性5mg /kg咖啡因或安慰剂后,进行日常练习、力量和平衡测试。结果:无论普拉提训练如何,咖啡因摄入量减少,10米步行测试时间(安慰剂vs咖啡因前,6.48±0.70 vs 6.51±0.82秒;安慰剂vs咖啡因分别为5.84±0.70 vs 5.48±0.61秒;P = 0.008;ηp 2 = 0.404)和up and go测试(安慰剂组vs咖啡因组,26.30±1.82 vs 24.37±2.12秒;安慰剂vs咖啡因分别为22.96±2.36 vs 22.49±2.27秒;P = .002;ηp 2 = 0.517)。在10米步行测试中,参与者对咖啡因摄入的反应并没有降低(ΔPre vs ΔPost, -0.33±0.66 vs -0.36±0.53秒;P = .888),但在计时起走测试中反应较差(ΔPre vs ΔPost, -1.92±2.06 vs -0.47±1.15秒;P = 0.030)。坐立测试、从地板上站起来、穿t恤和不穿t恤、握力和平衡变量没有差异。结论:虽然咖啡因改善了10米步行测试和计时和走测试的表现,但健康的老年人在普拉提训练后对咖啡因的反应较弱,仅对计时和走测试的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Masthead Table of contents A Retrospective Analysis of 190 Patients With Scoliosis Referred to a Private Australian Clinical Advisory Service Between 2017 and 2020 Caffeine Responsiveness Before and After Pilates Training in Healthy Older Adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1