Awake, endoscopic lumbar interbody spinal fusion: 10 years of experience with the first 400 cases.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurosurgery. Spine Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.3171/2024.9.SPINE2431
Michael Y Wang, Jay Grossman
{"title":"Awake, endoscopic lumbar interbody spinal fusion: 10 years of experience with the first 400 cases.","authors":"Michael Y Wang, Jay Grossman","doi":"10.3171/2024.9.SPINE2431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Awake, endoscopic spinal fusion has been utilized as an ultra-minimally invasive surgery technique to accomplish the goals of spinal fixation, fusion, and disc height restoration. While many techniques exist for this approach, this series represents a single institution's experience with a large cohort and the evolution of this method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of a consecutive series of 400 patients treated over a 10-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Endoscopic decompression, expandable intervertebral spacer deployment, and percutaneous screws were combined with liposomal bupivacaine to allow for the surgery to be performed without general endotracheal anesthesia (GETA) in the vast majority of cases. Clinical and radiographic postoperative results were reviewed with special attention to surgical complications, in particular dorsal root ganglion (DRG) irritation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients underwent surgery successfully without conversion to an open operation. Their mean age was 69.1 ± 10.4 years, and 42% of the patients were male. A total of 509 levels were fused, with the most common indication being spondylolisthesis (67.5%). The mean operative time was 84.6 ± 31.4 minutes, the mean intraoperative blood loss was 98 ± 63 ml, and the mean hospital length of stay was 1.93 ± 1.1 nights. Overall, 4.3% of the patients underwent planned GETA due to comorbidities, and 2% were converted to GETA intraoperatively. Eighty percent of the patients experienced > 75% improvement in leg pain, and 52% experienced > 75% improvement in axial back pain. Complications included transient DRG irritation (23%), adjacent-level disease requiring reoperation (3.5%), inadequate decompression (2.3%), and nonunion (1.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This large case series demonstrates that awake, endoscopic spinal fusion is a viable option with acceptable clinical and radiographic results in a select patient population. Meticulous attention to detail is required to limit the rate of DRG irritation, achieve interbody height restoration, and mitigate nonunions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.9.SPINE2431","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Awake, endoscopic spinal fusion has been utilized as an ultra-minimally invasive surgery technique to accomplish the goals of spinal fixation, fusion, and disc height restoration. While many techniques exist for this approach, this series represents a single institution's experience with a large cohort and the evolution of this method.

Methods: The medical records of a consecutive series of 400 patients treated over a 10-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Endoscopic decompression, expandable intervertebral spacer deployment, and percutaneous screws were combined with liposomal bupivacaine to allow for the surgery to be performed without general endotracheal anesthesia (GETA) in the vast majority of cases. Clinical and radiographic postoperative results were reviewed with special attention to surgical complications, in particular dorsal root ganglion (DRG) irritation.

Results: All patients underwent surgery successfully without conversion to an open operation. Their mean age was 69.1 ± 10.4 years, and 42% of the patients were male. A total of 509 levels were fused, with the most common indication being spondylolisthesis (67.5%). The mean operative time was 84.6 ± 31.4 minutes, the mean intraoperative blood loss was 98 ± 63 ml, and the mean hospital length of stay was 1.93 ± 1.1 nights. Overall, 4.3% of the patients underwent planned GETA due to comorbidities, and 2% were converted to GETA intraoperatively. Eighty percent of the patients experienced > 75% improvement in leg pain, and 52% experienced > 75% improvement in axial back pain. Complications included transient DRG irritation (23%), adjacent-level disease requiring reoperation (3.5%), inadequate decompression (2.3%), and nonunion (1.8%).

Conclusions: This large case series demonstrates that awake, endoscopic spinal fusion is a viable option with acceptable clinical and radiographic results in a select patient population. Meticulous attention to detail is required to limit the rate of DRG irritation, achieve interbody height restoration, and mitigate nonunions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
清醒,内窥镜腰椎椎体间融合术:10年400例的经验。
目的:清醒时,内镜下脊柱融合术已被用作一种超微创手术技术,以实现脊柱固定、融合和椎间盘高度恢复的目标。虽然这种方法存在许多技术,但本系列代表了单个机构对大型队列的经验和这种方法的演变。方法:回顾性分析了连续10年400例患者的医疗记录。在绝大多数病例中,内镜下减压、可扩展椎间垫片部署和经皮螺钉联合布比卡因脂质体使手术无需全身气管内麻醉(GETA)。回顾了临床和术后放射学结果,特别注意手术并发症,特别是背根神经节(DRG)刺激。结果:所有患者均顺利完成手术,未转开腹手术。平均年龄69.1±10.4岁,男性占42%。共融合509节段,最常见的适应症是脊柱滑脱(67.5%)。平均手术时间84.6±31.4分钟,平均术中出血量98±63 ml,平均住院时间1.93±1.1晚。总体而言,4.3%的患者由于合并症而接受了计划中的GETA, 2%的患者在术中转为GETA。80%的患者在腿部疼痛方面有> - 75%的改善,52%的患者在腰背痛方面有> - 75%的改善。并发症包括短暂性DRG刺激(23%),邻接层疾病需要再次手术(3.5%),减压不足(2.3%)和不愈合(1.8%)。结论:这个大的病例系列表明清醒,内窥镜脊柱融合术是一种可行的选择,在选定的患者群体中具有可接受的临床和放射学结果。需要对细节进行细致的关注,以限制DRG的刺激率,实现体间高度恢复,并减轻骨不连。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.
期刊最新文献
Clinical and radiographic comparison of robot-assisted single-position versus traditional dual-position lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Impact of pedicle screw accuracy on clinical outcomes after 1- or 2-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Awake, endoscopic lumbar interbody spinal fusion: 10 years of experience with the first 400 cases. Patient-reported outcome trajectories the first 24 months after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a Quality Outcomes Database study. The impact of lower thoracic versus upper lumbar upper instrumented vertebra in minimally invasive correction of adult spinal deformity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1