Association between meningioma consistency and surgical outcomes.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.3171/2024.8.JNS241066
Ishan Shah, Ryan S Chung, Kevin Liu, David J Cote, Robert G Briggs, Gage Guerra, David Gomez, Max Yang, Jeffrey J Feng, Alex Renn, Mark S Shiroishi, Kyle Hurth, Racheal Peterson, Gabriel Zada
{"title":"Association between meningioma consistency and surgical outcomes.","authors":"Ishan Shah, Ryan S Chung, Kevin Liu, David J Cote, Robert G Briggs, Gage Guerra, David Gomez, Max Yang, Jeffrey J Feng, Alex Renn, Mark S Shiroishi, Kyle Hurth, Racheal Peterson, Gabriel Zada","doi":"10.3171/2024.8.JNS241066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Tumor consistency, or fibrosity, affects the ability to optimally resect meningiomas, especially with recent trends evolving toward minimally invasive approaches. The authors' team previously validated a practical 5-point scale for intraoperative grading of meningioma consistency. The impact of meningioma consistency on surgical management and outcomes, however, has yet to be explored. This study aimed to determine associations between meningioma consistency and presenting symptoms, tumor characteristics, and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 209 surgically resected meningiomas were intraoperatively assigned a consistency grade according to a previously validated 5-point scale, ranging from extremely soft, suctionable tumors (grade 1) to firm/calcified tumors (grade 5). Presenting symptoms, tumor characteristics, postoperative complications, and surgical outcomes for these patients were prospectively collected. Tumor consistency was analyzed in three categories (grades 1 and 2, grade 3, and grades 4 and 5), using ANOVA, chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, and univariable logistic regression to evaluate associations between consistency and perioperative characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort included 209 patients, of whom 48 (23%) were males with a mean age of 55.0 ± 13.7 years. Meningioma consistency distribution was as follows: grades 1 and 2 (n = 23, 11.0%), grade 3 (n = 88, 42.1%), and grades 4 and 5 (n = 98, 46.9%). The majority of meningiomas were skull base tumors (n = 144, 68.9%). Higher-consistency tumors were associated with lower rates of gross-total resection (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.13-0.46; p < 0.001), increased invasiveness (OR 4.73, 95% CI 1.53-14.60; p = 0.007), tumor recurrence following resection (OR 3.30, 95% CI 1.25-8.66; p = 0.016), reoperation (OR 3.08, 95% CI 1.16-8.14; p = 0.024), and increased complication rates (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.05-4.15; p = 0.037). No significant associations were identified with preoperative symptoms, tumor size (mean 4.04 ± 1.50 cm), or duration of surgery (mean 4.26 ± 1.60 hours) (all p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tumor consistency is associated with important meningioma characteristics and perioperative outcomes. A prior knowledge pertaining to meningioma consistency and tumor characteristics using advanced imaging is a priority and may provide surgeons with meaningful data to guide resection strategy and anticipate postoperative outcomes and complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.8.JNS241066","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Tumor consistency, or fibrosity, affects the ability to optimally resect meningiomas, especially with recent trends evolving toward minimally invasive approaches. The authors' team previously validated a practical 5-point scale for intraoperative grading of meningioma consistency. The impact of meningioma consistency on surgical management and outcomes, however, has yet to be explored. This study aimed to determine associations between meningioma consistency and presenting symptoms, tumor characteristics, and postoperative outcomes.

Methods: A total of 209 surgically resected meningiomas were intraoperatively assigned a consistency grade according to a previously validated 5-point scale, ranging from extremely soft, suctionable tumors (grade 1) to firm/calcified tumors (grade 5). Presenting symptoms, tumor characteristics, postoperative complications, and surgical outcomes for these patients were prospectively collected. Tumor consistency was analyzed in three categories (grades 1 and 2, grade 3, and grades 4 and 5), using ANOVA, chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, and univariable logistic regression to evaluate associations between consistency and perioperative characteristics.

Results: The study cohort included 209 patients, of whom 48 (23%) were males with a mean age of 55.0 ± 13.7 years. Meningioma consistency distribution was as follows: grades 1 and 2 (n = 23, 11.0%), grade 3 (n = 88, 42.1%), and grades 4 and 5 (n = 98, 46.9%). The majority of meningiomas were skull base tumors (n = 144, 68.9%). Higher-consistency tumors were associated with lower rates of gross-total resection (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.13-0.46; p < 0.001), increased invasiveness (OR 4.73, 95% CI 1.53-14.60; p = 0.007), tumor recurrence following resection (OR 3.30, 95% CI 1.25-8.66; p = 0.016), reoperation (OR 3.08, 95% CI 1.16-8.14; p = 0.024), and increased complication rates (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.05-4.15; p = 0.037). No significant associations were identified with preoperative symptoms, tumor size (mean 4.04 ± 1.50 cm), or duration of surgery (mean 4.26 ± 1.60 hours) (all p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Tumor consistency is associated with important meningioma characteristics and perioperative outcomes. A prior knowledge pertaining to meningioma consistency and tumor characteristics using advanced imaging is a priority and may provide surgeons with meaningful data to guide resection strategy and anticipate postoperative outcomes and complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
期刊最新文献
A comprehensive multicenter analysis of clinical, molecular, and imaging characteristics and outcomes of H3 K27-altered diffuse midline glioma in adults. Association between meningioma consistency and surgical outcomes. Bridging thrombolysis versus direct endovascular treatment in acute vertebrobasilar artery complex occlusion. Clinical outcomes and cost-utility analysis of GKRS plus TKIs versus TKIs in patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma and brain metastases: a Markov decision model. Letter to the Editor. Exploring the impact of cranioplasty timing in TBI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1