Thread-Filler: A Standardized Combination Therapy.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Craniofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000010669
Özge Öztürk Bilkay, Mehmet Emre Yeğin, Ufuk Bilkay
{"title":"Thread-Filler: A Standardized Combination Therapy.","authors":"Özge Öztürk Bilkay, Mehmet Emre Yeğin, Ufuk Bilkay","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000010669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advanced technology and increasing knowledge about aging faces have combined to create the illusion of thread lifting to replace surgical interventions. However, results that came far beyond expectations led to a heavy suspicion of these tools. However, combined treatments with fillers would have better outcomes with a synergetic effect. In this study, 52 patients were treated with a specific thread, whereas soft tissue support was added to supervene the lifting effect of the threads. With a mean age of 48 years, these patients were treated with 3 pairs of mid and lower facial areas, and one for eyebrows. With a median amount of 5 mL fillers were added simultaneously at the same treatment plan. The follow-up period was 32 months. Assessment with a Likert Scale questionnaire revealed most of the patients (n = 42) were delighted, whereas only one patient was unsatisfied. The only unsatisfied patient experienced the most frustrating complication, which was thread removal due to infection. The literature shows unauthorized, unspecialized applications of such medical devices cause failure and loss of reliability. Therefore, the most important point of this technique is the sterile setting. Other issues that are discussed in this paper also aim to direct the reader to achieve the most benefit of these 2 techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":"36 1","pages":"177-181"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010669","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advanced technology and increasing knowledge about aging faces have combined to create the illusion of thread lifting to replace surgical interventions. However, results that came far beyond expectations led to a heavy suspicion of these tools. However, combined treatments with fillers would have better outcomes with a synergetic effect. In this study, 52 patients were treated with a specific thread, whereas soft tissue support was added to supervene the lifting effect of the threads. With a mean age of 48 years, these patients were treated with 3 pairs of mid and lower facial areas, and one for eyebrows. With a median amount of 5 mL fillers were added simultaneously at the same treatment plan. The follow-up period was 32 months. Assessment with a Likert Scale questionnaire revealed most of the patients (n = 42) were delighted, whereas only one patient was unsatisfied. The only unsatisfied patient experienced the most frustrating complication, which was thread removal due to infection. The literature shows unauthorized, unspecialized applications of such medical devices cause failure and loss of reliability. Therefore, the most important point of this technique is the sterile setting. Other issues that are discussed in this paper also aim to direct the reader to achieve the most benefit of these 2 techniques.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
螺纹填充:一种标准化的联合疗法。
先进的技术和越来越多的关于衰老面孔的知识结合在一起,创造了一种错觉,即用提线术来取代手术干预。然而,远远超出预期的结果导致了对这些工具的严重怀疑。然而,与填充物联合治疗会有更好的效果和协同效应。在本研究中,52例患者使用特定的螺纹治疗,同时增加软组织支持来监督螺纹的提升效果。患者平均年龄48岁,采用3对面部中下区和1对眉毛进行治疗。在相同的治疗方案中,同时添加中位数为5ml的填充剂。随访32个月。李克特量表问卷调查显示,大多数患者(n = 42)感到满意,而只有一名患者不满意。唯一不满意的患者经历了最令人沮丧的并发症,即因感染而拔除螺纹。文献显示,未经授权,非专业应用此类医疗器械会导致故障和可靠性损失。因此,该技术最重要的一点是无菌设置。本文讨论的其他问题也旨在指导读者实现这两种技术的最大利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
期刊最新文献
Management Strategies for Isolated Medial Orbital Wall Fractures: A Literature Review of Surgical and Conservative Approaches. Clinical Experience in Emergency Surgery for Antithrombotic Drug-Related Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Major Tragal Malformations: Structural Feature, Classification, and Reconstruction. Where Imagination Comes From: From Page to Screen to Skin. Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders: A Visual Analysis of Research Hotspots.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1