Experiences and evaluation of the new standards for student supervision and assessment.

Gulen Addis, Natasha Loughrey
{"title":"Experiences and evaluation of the new standards for student supervision and assessment.","authors":"Gulen Addis, Natasha Loughrey","doi":"10.12968/bjon.2024.0334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Nursing and Midwifery Council's <i>Standards for Student Supervision and Assessment</i> (SSSA), introduced in 2018, shifted from a mentorship model to a coaching model, creating new roles for practice supervisors, assessors, and academic assessors. This study explores the experiences of nursing students, practice assessors, and supervisors working with the SSSA. Using a qualitative approach, 14 semi-structured interviews were conducted with nursing students and staff. Thematic analysis identified three key themes: SSSA-related training, organisational support, and expectations from students and staff. Findings suggest time constraints, inconsistent training, and use of the electronic practice assessment documentation (e-PAD) platform require attention to improve the learning experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":520014,"journal":{"name":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","volume":"34 1","pages":"36-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2024.0334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Nursing and Midwifery Council's Standards for Student Supervision and Assessment (SSSA), introduced in 2018, shifted from a mentorship model to a coaching model, creating new roles for practice supervisors, assessors, and academic assessors. This study explores the experiences of nursing students, practice assessors, and supervisors working with the SSSA. Using a qualitative approach, 14 semi-structured interviews were conducted with nursing students and staff. Thematic analysis identified three key themes: SSSA-related training, organisational support, and expectations from students and staff. Findings suggest time constraints, inconsistent training, and use of the electronic practice assessment documentation (e-PAD) platform require attention to improve the learning experience.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生监督评估新标准的经验与评价。
2018年推出的护理和助产委员会学生监督和评估标准(SSSA)从指导模式转变为指导模式,为实践主管、评估人员和学术评估人员创造了新的角色。本研究探讨护生、实务评核员及督导人员与社会安全保障协会合作的经验。采用定性方法,对护理学生和工作人员进行了14次半结构化访谈。专题分析确定了三个关键主题:与sssa相关的培训、组织支持以及学生和员工的期望。研究结果表明,时间限制、不一致的培训和电子实践评估文件(e-PAD)平台的使用需要注意改善学习体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A multifaceted and enjoyable career in mental health care, spanning clinical practice, research and policy development. Benefits of a diverse gut microbiome in systemic anti-cancer therapy patients. Tackling some of the NHS patient safety problems in 2025. Make nursing recruitment a priority. NHS manager regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1