Evaluating the effects of continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration on O2 and CO2 removal and energy expenditure measurement using indirect calorimetry.

Abstract

Background: Continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) is used in critically ill patients, but its impact on O₂ and CO₂ removal, as well as the accuracy of resting energy expenditure (REE) measurement using indirect calorimetry (IC) remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the effects of CVVHDF on O₂ and CO₂ removal and the accuracy of REE measurement using IC in patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.

Design: Prospective, observational, single-center study.

Methodology: Patients with sepsis undergoing CVVHDF had CO₂ flow (QCO₂) and O₂ flow (QO₂) measured at multiple sampling points before and after the filter. REE was calculated using the Weir equation based on V̇CO₂ and V̇O₂ measured by IC, using true V̇CO₂ accounting for the CRRT balance, and estimated using the Harris-Benedict equation. The respiratory quotient (RQ), the ratio of V̇CO₂ to V̇O₂, was evaluated by comparing measured and true values.

Results: The mean QCO₂ levels measured upstream of the filter were 76.26 ± 17.33 ml/min and significantly decreased to 62.12 ± 13.64 ml/min downstream of the filter (p < 0.0001). The mean QO₂ levels remained relatively unchanged. The mean true REE was 1774.28 ± 438.20 kcal/day, significantly different from both the measured REE of 1758.59 ± 434.06 kcal/day (p = 0.0029) and the estimated REE of 1619.36 ± 295.46 kcal/day (p = 0.0475). The mean measured RQ value was 0.693 ± 0.118, while the mean true RQ value was 0.731 ± 0.121, with a significant difference (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: CVVHDF may significantly alter QCO₂ levels without affecting QO₂, influencing the REE and RQ results measured by IC. However, the impact on REE is not clinically significant, and the REE value obtained via IC is closer to the true REE than that estimated using the Harris-Benedict equation. Further studies are recommended to confirm these findings.