Zixi Zhang, Bo Peng, Akedanmu Nuranmubieke, Yangfan Xu, Yan Liu, Tao Tu, Qiuzhen Lin, Cancan Wang, Qiming Liu, Yichao Xiao
{"title":"Lipoprotein(a) and Atrial Fibrillation: Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Approaches.","authors":"Zixi Zhang, Bo Peng, Akedanmu Nuranmubieke, Yangfan Xu, Yan Liu, Tao Tu, Qiuzhen Lin, Cancan Wang, Qiming Liu, Yichao Xiao","doi":"10.7150/ijms.102301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels are increasingly recognized as a significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and may also contribute to atrial fibrillation (AF). This review investigated the indirect mechanisms through which Lp(a) may influence AF, including proatherogenic, prothrombotic, and proinflammatory pathways. Traditional lipid-lowering therapies, such as lifestyle modifications and statins, have limited effects on Lp(a) levels. Emerging treatments, such as proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, lipoprotein apheresis, small interfering RNA, antisense oligonucleotides, cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibitors, and interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibodies, are promising alternatives. Notably, only PCSK9 inhibitors and lipoprotein apheresis have been shown to reduce both Lp(a) levels and cardiovascular events. Research indicates varying associations between Lp(a) and AF across different populations, underscoring the need for diverse, large-scale studies to elucidate these differences. Ongoing trials aim to provide clearer insights into these relationships. Addressing these gaps is essential for developing targeted therapies to manage elevated Lp(a) and mitigate the risk of AF and associated cardiovascular events.</p>","PeriodicalId":14031,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"22 2","pages":"357-370"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.102301","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels are increasingly recognized as a significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and may also contribute to atrial fibrillation (AF). This review investigated the indirect mechanisms through which Lp(a) may influence AF, including proatherogenic, prothrombotic, and proinflammatory pathways. Traditional lipid-lowering therapies, such as lifestyle modifications and statins, have limited effects on Lp(a) levels. Emerging treatments, such as proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, lipoprotein apheresis, small interfering RNA, antisense oligonucleotides, cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibitors, and interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibodies, are promising alternatives. Notably, only PCSK9 inhibitors and lipoprotein apheresis have been shown to reduce both Lp(a) levels and cardiovascular events. Research indicates varying associations between Lp(a) and AF across different populations, underscoring the need for diverse, large-scale studies to elucidate these differences. Ongoing trials aim to provide clearer insights into these relationships. Addressing these gaps is essential for developing targeted therapies to manage elevated Lp(a) and mitigate the risk of AF and associated cardiovascular events.
期刊介绍:
Original research papers, reviews, and short research communications in any medical related area can be submitted to the Journal on the understanding that the work has not been published previously in whole or part and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Manuscripts in basic science and clinical medicine are both considered. There is no restriction on the length of research papers and reviews, although authors are encouraged to be concise. Short research communication is limited to be under 2500 words.